IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i3p105-d1613479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulating Vendor Market Concentration: Challenges in Digital Government for Health Information Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Na-Eun Cho

    (College of Business, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Policymakers face a dilemma in determining the optimal approach to regulating highly concentrated markets, especially in the context of digital government initiatives in healthcare. The current study investigates whether vendor market concentration facilitates or impedes efficiency in health information sharing. Utilizing data from the American Hospital Association’s annual surveys and information technology (IT) surveys from 2014 to 2016, we find that the market concentration of vendors, both at the state and county levels, indeed promotes information sharing among stakeholders. Specifically, when more hospitals in a given state or county use the same IT vendors for information sharing, providers exchange a more detailed level of information with a broader range of stakeholders compared to when using different vendors. Furthermore, we found that such facilitation varies among ownership types. Our findings highlight the complexities faced by policymakers in digital government, as restricting vendor market concentration too hastily could hinder the efficiency of information sharing and collaboration among healthcare providers. Additionally, such concentration may, in fact, enhance information sharing, especially for not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals. Overall, understanding the relationship between market concentration and information sharing can help healthcare administrators allocate resources more strategically, leading to better planning and less resource wastage, while aligning operational strategies with broader sustainability goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Na-Eun Cho, 2025. "Regulating Vendor Market Concentration: Challenges in Digital Government for Health Information Sharing," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:105-:d:1613479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/3/105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/3/105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Lammers, 2013. "The Effect Of Hospital–Physician Integration On Health Information Technology Adoption," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(10), pages 1215-1229, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maynou, L. & McGuire, A. & Serra-Sastre, V., 2019. "Exploring the Impact of New Medical Technology on Workforce Planning," Working Papers 19/07, Department of Economics, City University London.
    2. Maynou, Laia & Pearson, Georgia & McGuire, Alistair & Serra-Sastre, Victoria, 2022. "The diffusion of robotic surgery: Examining technology use in the English NHS," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(4), pages 325-336.
    3. Richards, Michael R. & Seward, Jonathan A. & Whaley, Christopher M., 2022. "Treatment consolidation after vertical integration: Evidence from outpatient procedure markets," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Lin, Haizhen & McCarthy, Ian M. & Richards, Michael, 2021. "Hospital Pricing Following Integration with Physician Practices," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Ian McCarthy & Sean Shenghsiu Huang, 2018. "Vertical Alignment Between Hospitals and Physicians as a Bargaining Response to Commercial Insurance Markets," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(1), pages 7-29, August.
    6. Na-Eun Cho & KiHoon Hong & Jongwha Chang, 2021. "Do Market Characteristics Matter? Factors Associated with Health Information Exchange," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-10, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:105-:d:1613479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.