IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v12y2022i1p36-d754425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Social Responsibility: Challenging Systemic Racism in the Aftermath of George Floyd’s Murder

Author

Listed:
  • Paulette A. Meikle

    (College of Arts and Sciences, University of Arkansas-Fort Smith, Fort Smith, AR 72913, USA)

  • Lekeitha R. Morris

    (Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, College of Fine Arts and Communication, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine university discretionary interpretation of the 2020 social upheaval that emanated from George Floyd’s murder as an element of university social responsibility (USR) policymaking. The paper addresses two research questions: (a) What are university presidents’ implicit and explicit social justice responses to George Floyd’s death and the idealistic protests of 2020? (b) To what degree are principles of social justice embedded in universities’ intellectual roots and social responsibility? Using a sample of university presidents’ public statements in response to George Floyd’s death and the idealistic protests of 2020, we analyze the response and responsibilities of universities in the struggle for a just society. We cross-check mission statements and strategic plans to corroborate universities’ public statements with their institutional philosophies, mission, and action plans relating to discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities and systemic racism. We use critical discourse analysis and the Voyant Tool to perform a textual analysis of 62 university presidents’ letters and mission statements. They all denounced the dehumanization and inequitable treatment of Black people. An important implication of our work is the sharp difference in the depth and forthrightness of responses by university presidents across university types. Some presidential letters are forthright in their denouncement of the murder of George Floyd and systemic racism, while others were, at best, vague in their approach. Presidential letters disclose their institutions’ priorities, organizational identities, and social responsibility convictions. Overall, mission statements and strategic plans included addressing systemic racism and inequality. While there is no ordered symmetry between presidential narratives and institutional action, we anticipate social responsibility as a core institutional value. We argue for social justice anti-racist platforms as critical dimensions of USR. We call for university milieus that promote a fair and just society among all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulette A. Meikle & Lekeitha R. Morris, 2022. "University Social Responsibility: Challenging Systemic Racism in the Aftermath of George Floyd’s Murder," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:36-:d:754425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/1/36/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/12/1/36/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abedalqader Rababah & Natalya I. Nikitina & Veronica M. Grebennikova & Zhanna R. Gardanova & Angelina O. Zekiy & Vadim V. Ponkratov & Nadezhda N. Bashkirova & Nikolay V. Kuznetsov & Tatyana I. Volkova, 2021. "University Social Responsibility during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Universities’ Case in the BRICS Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-29, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habarurema Jean Baptiste & Yan Guang Cai & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Nzabalirwa Wenceslas, 2022. "A Systematic Review of University Social Responsibility in Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Great Lakes Region of East Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 439-475, November.
    2. Hua Xiang & Jie Lu & Mikhail E. Kosov & Maria V. Volkova & Vadim V. Ponkratov & Andrey I. Masterov & Izabella D. Elyakova & Sergey Yu. Popkov & Denis Yu. Taburov & Natalia V. Lazareva & Iskandar Muda , 2023. "Sustainable Development of Employee Lifecycle Management in the Age of Global Challenges: Evidence from China, Russia, and Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Maurizio Comoli & Lorenzo Gelmini & Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2021. "University Social Responsibility: The Case of Italy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Kamer-Ainur Aivaz & Daniel Teodorescu, 2022. "The Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Medical Education: A Case Study at a Public University in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:36-:d:754425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.