IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedker/98988.html

Introducing the Kansas City Fed's Measure of Policy Rate Uncertainty (KC PRU)

Author

Abstract

Monitoring uncertainty around the future path of interest rates can help ensure that monetary policy is transmitting to the economy as intended. Because uncertainty is not directly observable, measuring uncertainty about the future policy rate can be difficult. Previous measures often face two key limitations. First, they may be released with a lag, making them less useful as a timely measure of policy rate uncertainty. Second, they may not be available over a long sample, making it difficult to compare measures of current uncertainty with historical context. In this article, Brent Bundick, A. Lee Smith, and Luca Van der Meer introduce the Kansas City Fed’s Measure of Policy Rate Uncertainty (KC PRU), a timely, market-based measure that can help overcome these limitations. The KC PRU measures one-year-ahead uncertainty using the prices of financial options, which settle based on future short-term interest rates that tend to be highly correlated with the federal funds rate. By combining both historical and newly issued options, they calculate the measure at a daily frequency starting in the late 1980s. Overall, their analysis suggests the KC PRU provides a timely measure of policy rate uncertainty that appears to be consistent with both historical movements and recent macroeconomic developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Brent Bundick & Andrew Lee Smith & Luca Van der Meer, 2024. "Introducing the Kansas City Fed's Measure of Policy Rate Uncertainty (KC PRU)," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:98988
    Note: The KC PRU measures uncertainty around the path of interest rates one year ahead, using the prices of financial options.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kansascityfed.org/Economic%20Review/documents/10503/EconomicReviewV109N7BundickSmithVanderMeer.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent Bundick & Trenton Herriford, 2017. "How Do FOMC Projections Affect Policy Uncertainty?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Q II, pages 5-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brent Bundick & Taeyoung Doh & Andrew Lee Smith, 2024. "How Do Financial Markets Perceive the Balance of Risks to the Policy Rate?," Economic Bulletin, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 1-4, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brent Bundick & Andrew Lee Smith, 2020. "Policymakers Have Options for Additional Accommodation: Forward Guidance and Yield Curve Control," Economic Bulletin, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 1-5, July.
    2. Michael D Bauer & Aeimit Lakdawala & Philippe Mueller, 2022. "Market-Based Monetary Policy Uncertainty," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(644), pages 1290-1308.
    3. Bundick, Brent & Herriford, Trenton & Smith, A. Lee, 2024. "The Term Structure of Monetary Policy Uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Carola Conces Binder, 2021. "Central Bank Communication and Disagreement about the Natural Rate Hypothesis," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(2), pages 81-123, June.
    5. Brent Bundick & Andrew Lee Smith, 2022. "Evaluating Quantitative Easing: The Importance of Accounting for Forward Guidance," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 107(no.3), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Binder, Carola Conces, 2019. "Comment on “Central Bank announcements: Big news for little people?” by Michael Lamla and Dmitri Vinogradov," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 39-44.
    7. Carola Conces Binder & Rodrigo Sekkel, 2024. "Central bank forecasting: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 342-364, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedker:98988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kira Lillard (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbkcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.