IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedcec/103024.html

The Effect of Size Thresholds on Large Banks under the 2019 Tailoring Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Jan-Peter Siedlarek
  • Isabella Wang

Abstract

Federal bank regulators finalized a tailoring framework for large-bank regulation in 2019. Among other provisions, the 2019 tailoring framework replaced a single category of large banks above $50 billion in total assets with four new categories for prudential regulation separated by size thresholds. Compared to the 2010 Dodd–Frank Act, the 2019 tailoring framework phased in large-bank regulations incrementally, adding a smaller set of changes at each threshold instead of all at once at $50 billion. This Economic Commentary analyzes the effect of this change in banking regulation during the 2016 through 2023 period. It finds that the new framework reduced bunching of banks just below the $50 billion in total assets threshold, which was removed from the regulation. At the same time, there is evidence of banks’ bunching just below $100 billion and $250 billion in total assets, two of the newly introduced thresholds under the new framework. Such bunching suggests that the 2019 tailoring framework imposed some regulatory costs on banks at each threshold as regulations became incrementally stricter, as intended by the framework. It does not, however, appear to have prevented bank growth outright. Indeed, the data show that multiple banks grew beyond their applicable size threshold after the new framework was implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan-Peter Siedlarek & Isabella Wang, 2026. "The Effect of Size Thresholds on Large Banks under the 2019 Tailoring Framework," Economic Commentary, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, vol. 2026(07), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedcec:103024
    DOI: 10.26509/frbc-ec-202607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-ec-202607
    File Function: Persistent link with full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.clevelandfed.org/-/media/project/clevelandfedtenant/clevelandfedsite/publications/economic-commentary/2026/ec-202607/ec-202607-effect-of-size-thresholds-on-large-banks-2019-tailoring-framework.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26509/frbc-ec-202607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrien Alvero & Sakai Ando & Kairong Xiao, 2023. "Watch What They Do, Not What They Say: Estimating Regulatory Costs from Revealed Preferences," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(6), pages 2224-2273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. IMANI, Yusuke & MINAMI, Koutaroh, 2025. "Wall of Main Bank : Bank Megamerger and Lending Adjustment," Working Paper Series G-1-29, Hitotsubashi University Center for Financial Research.
    2. Liang, Lantian & Zhang, Harold H. & Zhao, Feng & Zhao, Xiaofei, 2025. "Disclosure mandate, trust, and asset securitization," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Chen, Chuan & Jia, Yanrong & Martin, Xiumin & Silveira, Bernardo, 2025. "Assessing the objective function of the SEC against financial misconduct: A structural approach," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1).
    4. He, Dongwei & Wu, Yifan & Wang, Yifan & Xing, Xueyan, 2023. "Prudential regulation and bank performance: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Ma, ChaoQun & Xiong, YuanKun & Chen, XunQi, 2025. "Fintech innovation regulation in China: An index-based comprehensive evaluation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PD).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedcec:103024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: 4D Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbclus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.