IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primer on U.S. stock price indices


  • Peter Fortune


The measurement of the "average" price of common stocks is a matter of widespread interest. Investors want to know how "the market" is doing, and to be able to compare their returns with a meaningful benchmark. Money managers often have their compensation tied to performance, typically measured by comparing their results to a benchmark portfolio, so they and their clients are interested in the benchmark portfolio's returns. And policymakers want to judge the potential for sudden adjustments in stock prices when differences from "fundamental value emerge. ; This article discusses some of the issues in constructing and interpreting stock price indices. The author focuses on the most widely used indices: the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Standard & Poor's 500, the Russell 2000, the NASDAQ Composite, and the Wilshire 5000. Each of these indices is intended to be a benchmark portfolio for a different segment of the universe of common stocks. He compares the movements in the five popular indices over the last two decades and examines the correlations between the returns on each of the stock price indices. His findings suggest that the Dow 30, the S&P 500, and the Wilshire 5000 are similar and capture the movements in a different segment of the market than do the NASDAQ Composite and the Russell 2000.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Fortune, 1998. "Primer on U.S. stock price indices," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Nov, pages 25-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbne:y:1998:i:nov:p:25-40

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Fama, Eugene F, et al, 1969. "The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Peter Fortune, 1999. "Are stock returns different over weekends? a jump diffusion analysis of the "weekend effect"," New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Sep, pages 3-19.

    More about this item


    Stock market ; Stock - Prices ; Stocks;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbne:y:1998:i:nov:p:25-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catherine Spozio). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.