IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejedu0/v4y2023i2id30630.html

Experiences of Filipino Secondary Science Teachers in Assessing Students in Flexible Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan V. Lansangan
  • Antriman V. Orleans

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the educational landscape in the Philippines as schools transitioned to flexible instruction delivery far from the default face-to-face platform. This calls for adjustment and recalibration in the instructional practices and, more importantly, in assessing the student’s learning outcomes. The current study is a qualitative inquiry exploring the experiences of Junior High School secondary science teachers in the execution of the four facets of assessment in the context of flexible instruction: their assessment obligations; expected outcomes in assessing science learners; obstacles hindering assessment practices; and opportunities brought by the new platform of assessing science learning. Findings from this study uncovered that continuity of teaching and learning during the health crisis brought new expectations from the teachers as assessors of learning while adhering to the essential core learning outcomes. At the same time, though direct and indirect challenges were perceived to complicate the assessment process, various opportunities emerged, highlighting new practices that can be applied in the context. The results offered implications for policy, research, and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan V. Lansangan & Antriman V. Orleans, 2023. "Experiences of Filipino Secondary Science Teachers in Assessing Students in Flexible Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 4(2), pages 182-193, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:4:y:2023:i:2:id:30630
    DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/30630
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu/article/download/30630/5963
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard DLC. Gonzales, 2023. "From Face-to-Face to Virtual Student Assessment: Changes in Student Assessment Practices during COVID-19 Among Filipino Teachers," European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, European Open Science, vol. 4(1), pages 159-164, January.
    2. Veronica Boix Mansilla & Elizabeth Dawes Duraising, 2007. "Targeted Assessment of Students' Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(2), pages 215-237, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evelyn Svingen & Egle Tsirova & Ulviyya Khalilova, 2026. "Developing critical thinking through the lens of interdisciplinarity: a case study of a criminological theory module," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Dr. Shabnam Razaq & Dr. Shehla Sheikh & Aliya Murad & Syed Waqas Ali Shah, 2023. "Assessing the Efficiency of Sustainability Education Programs in Schools," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 602-609.
    3. M. Teresa Fuertes-Camacho & Frederic Marimon & Sílvia Albareda-Tiana, 2025. "Design and Validation of a Multidimensional Instrument for Measuring Eco-Social Competences in Education for Sustainability in Early Childhood Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Cong Xu & Chih-Fu Wu, 2025. "What factors may contribute to the improvement of students’ interdisciplinary integration competencies?—a comparative study of various interdisciplinary curriculum patterns," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Suzanne Dean & Claire Williams & Samantha Donnelly & Tracy Levett-Jones, 2017. "Designing a Women’s Refuge: An Interdisciplinary Health, Architecture and Landscape Collaboration," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(6), pages 139-139, April.
    6. Klara Kövesi, 2015. "A case study of teaching interdisciplinary collaboration for engineering students," Post-Print hal-01337475, HAL.
    7. Ching Ting Tany Kwee, 2021. "I Want to Teach Sustainable Development in My English Classroom: A Case Study of Incorporating Sustainable Development Goals in English Teaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    8. K. P. J. Fortuin & C. S. A. Koppen & C. Kroeze, 2013. "The contribution of systems analysis to training students in cognitive interdisciplinary skills in environmental science education," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 139-152, June.
    9. Nitza Davidovitch & Ruth Dorot, 2020. "Interdisciplinary Instruction: Between Art and Literature," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(3), pages 269-269, June.
    10. Kevin Francis & Martha Henderson & Erin Martin & Kathleen Saul & Shangrila Joshi, 2018. "Collaborative teaching and interdisciplinary learning in graduate environmental studies," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 343-350, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejedu0:v:4:y:2023:i:2:id:30630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejedu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.