IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/clinic/v2y2021i6id12154.html

Thermal Protection of Newborns: The World Health Organization Guidelines Need to Include Clear and Feasible Options for Low-Resource Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Subhashchandra Daga

Abstract

Backgorund: Hypothermia in babies may increase mortality, directly or indirectly, by potentiating the effect of the other morbidities. Guidelines published by The World health organization (WHO) on newborn health (2015) may be inadequate to address the issue in a low-resource setting. To be relevant in such a context, they should be user-friendly for the trainers of health workers (HW) who may be responsible for interpreting the recommendations and training the HW. Text: According to earlier guidelines (2013), ‘No randomized or quasi-randomized trial that evaluated the impact of keeping infants warm after discharge (hospital births) or after 24 hours (home births) was identified’. However, kangaroo mother care (KMC), a strong recommendation with moderate-quality evidence, and thermal protection are inseparable, as the most crucial component of KMC is skin-to-skin contact, which keeps a baby warm. A HW may be surprised when the guidelines or the basis change and, the move comes at a time when the earlier guidelines (1993) are just finding roots in patient care practices. Current guidelines are based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, where randomized trials assume more importance. The guidelines recommend the following methods to keep infants warm after birth: KMC (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence), intermittent KMC (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence), and radiant warmers or incubators (strong recommendation, very low-quality evidence). The divergence between the evidence and the recommendations may be difficult for the HW to comprehend. Conclusions: The guidelines for postnatal care need to be revisited and revised so that clear and feasible options for keeping infants warm in low-resource settings are offered. Besides KMC, warm rooms, heated mattresses, plastic wraps and Styrofoam boxes may be suggested. What is already known about this subject? • In the absence of a randomized or quasi-randomized trial that evaluated the impact of keeping infants warm, there are fewer options in a low-resource setting. • They include Kangaroo mother care and incubators/radiant warmers. What does this study add? • Options that may not have been supported by randomized trials but have consistent results may be suggested. • They include warm rooms, heated mattresses, plastic wraps and Styrofoam boxes. • In future revisions, the level of evidence should be paired with the recommendations. How might this impact on clinical practice or future developments? The health worker may choose the most feasible option at home or at a facility.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhashchandra Daga, 2021. "Thermal Protection of Newborns: The World Health Organization Guidelines Need to Include Clear and Feasible Options for Low-Resource Settings," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), pages 13-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:6:id:12154
    DOI: 10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.6.154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/view/12154
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed/article/download/12154/2429
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.6.154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2000. "LETS and the Transition to Sustainability," Chapters, in: Citizenship, Sustainability and Environmental Research, chapter 7, pages 79-100, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. ., 2000. "LETS and Environmental Sustainability: Q Sort III," Chapters, in: Citizenship, Sustainability and Environmental Research, chapter 6, pages 65-78, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Fan, Shenggen & Hazell, Peter B.R., 2000. "Promoting Sustainable Development In Less-Favored Areas," 2020 Vision Focus Series 16034, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Unknown, 2000. "Promoting Sustainable Development In Less-Favored Areas," 2020 Vision Focus Series 16035, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Shaojun Li & Pengfei Guo & Qing Zou & Fuxiang He & Feng Xu & Liping Tan, 2016. "Efficacy and Safety of Plastic Wrap for Prevention of Hypothermia after Birth and during NICU in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Pender, John L. & Hazell, Peter B. R., 2000. "Promoting sustainable development in less-favored areas," 2020 vision focus 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. John L.R. Proops & Malte Faber & Reiner Manstetten & Frank Jöst, 2000. "Achieving a Sustainable World," Chapters, in: Clóvis Cavalcanti (ed.), The Environment, Sustainable Development and Public Policies, chapter 5, pages 53-58, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. ., 2000. "Picking Winners or Sustaining Losers?," Chapters, in: Industry Policy in Taiwan and Korea in the 1980s, chapter 4, pages 131-159, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krüger, Manon, 2024. "Verkehrsmittelwahl bei Urlaubsreisen: Was spricht für, was gegen den Reisebus?," Working Paper Series 4, Deutsches Institut für Tourismusforschung, Fachhochschule Westküste.
    2. Lopatta, Kerstin & Tideman, Sebastian A. & Scheil, Carolin & Makarem, Naser, 2023. "The current state of corporate human rights disclosure of the global top 500 business enterprises: Measurement and determinants," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Joachim Von Braun, 2005. "Agricultural economics and distributional effects," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Ruben, Ruerd & Pender, John, 2004. "Rural diversity and heterogeneity in less-favoured areas: the quest for policy targeting," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 303-320, August.
    5. Subhashchandra Daga, 2021. "Attaining Sustainable Development Goal for Newborn Survival: Reinforcing Postnatal Interventions," European Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-4, November.
    6. Barbier, Edward B., 2016. "Is green growth relevant for poor economies?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 178-191.
    7. Hayatullah Ahmadzai & Seta Tutundjian & Ismahane Elouafi, 2021. "Policies for Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihood in Marginal Lands: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Simeon Ehui & John Pender, 2005. "Resource degradation, low agricultural productivity, and poverty in sub‐Saharan Africa: pathways out of the spiral," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 225-242, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:clinic:v:2:y:2021:i:6:id:12154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/clinicmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.