IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/env/journl/ev19editev192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Censoring Science in Research Officially

Author

Listed:
  • Clive L. Spash

Abstract

The way in which humans understand the world is highly value laden. Yet, the values entailed in research are often hidden, even though the way in which projects are funded, the type of work favoured and the framing of that work all make self-evident a set of values. The hope of many researchers holding to truth-seeking science is that by focusing on a specific research agenda and avoiding overt public policy statements their work can be conducted in a way which is separated from the messy world of politics and value judgments. Yet as humans these same people hold values and make judgments on a daily basis, including their judgments over what is ‘good science’, ‘quality research’ and ‘valid argument’. Determining relevance, validity and quality is a value laden process open to dispute. Naively assuming the public should trust in ‘science’, whether natural or social, is to ignore what our experience of environmental problems and understanding of environmental values have taught. Science is a contested contributor of societal information which may help or harm in unforeseen ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Clive L. Spash, 2010. "Censoring Science in Research Officially," Environmental Values, White Horse Press, vol. 19(2), pages 141-146, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:env:journl:ev19:editev192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/whp/ev/2010/00000019/00000002/art00002
    Download Restriction: downloads of articles require payment or registration of paid subscription
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social sciences; natural sciences; research funding; alternative energy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D46 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Value Theory
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:env:journl:ev19:editev192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrew Johnson (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.whpress.co.uk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.