IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/igdrpp/v1y2008i1p7-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The polluted ecosystem game

Author

Listed:
  • W.A. Brock
  • W.D. Dechert

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to address the issue of optimal management of ecosystems by developing a dynamic model of strategic behavior by users/communities of an ecosystem such as a lake, which is subject to pollution resulting from the users. More specifically, it builds a model of two ecosystems that are spatially connected. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses the techniques of optimal control theory and game theory. Findings - The paper uncovers sufficient conditions under which the analysis of the dynamic game can be converted to an optimal problem for a pseudo authority. It is shown that if the discount rate on the future is high enough relative to ecological self-restoration parameters then multiple stable states appear. In this case, if the pollution level is high enough it is too costly in terms of what must be given up today to restore the damaged system. By using computational methods, the paper evaluates the relative strengths of lack of coordination, strength of ecosystem self-cleaning forces, size of discount rates, etc. Originality/value - The methodology as well as findings can help to devise an optimal management strategy over time for ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • W.A. Brock & W.D. Dechert, 2008. "The polluted ecosystem game," Indian Growth and Development Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 7-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:igdrpp:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:7-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/17538250810868116?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:igdrpp:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:7-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: http://www.emeraldinsight.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.