IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v111y2021icp28-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobility change in Delhi due to COVID and its’ immediate and long term impact on demand with intervened non motorized transport friendly infrastructural policies

Author

Listed:
  • Advani, Mukti
  • Sharma, Niraj
  • Dhyani, Rajni

Abstract

The COVID pandemic severely impacted mobility during lockdown as well as the period after that observing different phases of unlocking process. Lockdown has resulted in drastic mobility reduction and subsequent unlocking process brought back mobility gradually to a certain level, substantially lower than the Pre-COVID periods. However, this is expected to be back gradually to same level of Pre-COVID after certain period of time. While this change is planned to be gradual, it creates an opportunity to improve mobility towards non-motorized transport (NMT) which can influence travel behavior for present as well for the future covering Pre and Post-COVID periods. Apart from studying the influencing travel behavior during Pre and Post-COVID conditions, change in quantum of commuting population is required to be studied for various estimations related to transport planning. This quantum of commuting population is largely affected by the adopted locking/unlocking strategies by Government of India. Commuting population and travel behavior got influenced by the large migration from metro cities to smaller towns, adopted work from home (WFH) styles, reduced commute of elderly and children and other restrictions on gatherings, etc. Considering the range of allowed activities, influenced by the phases of locking/unlocking strategies, twelve different scenarios have been developed for various estimations. The developed scenarios have been named with alpha numeric style ranging from A0 to E5. A0 presenting the Pre-COVID scenario. Alphabet “A” represent Pre-COVID scenario, “B”, “C”, “D” and “E” Scenarios represent the unlocking phases, while number 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 represents the different policy aspects related to the change on capacity of transport services (i.e. public transport capacity and change due to infrastructural improvement for NMT). Scenario A0 represents the Pre-COVID situation, while other ranges (viz., B1, B2, B3, C2, C3, C4, D2, D3, D5) represents various locking/unlocking levels. The Scenario E5 represents the situation without any movement restrictions, where public transport systems are assumed to be functioning with full capacity and infrastructure has been improved for NMT trips. Estimations for all the 12 scenarios include commuting population, their modal split, vehicle kilometers travelled by these vehicles and corresponding vehicular emission. Estimated modal split also includes the influence of improved NMT friendly infrastructure and reduced capacity of public transport systems. The results of developed scenarios provide a handy information for the policy makers to choose right policy to promote sustainable transportation with adequate emphasis on NMT. It is evident that as compared to the Pre-COVID scenario (A0), Post-COVID scenario with improved NMT infrastructure (E5) has VKT reduction of 19% in MTWs, 5% in Cars and 49% in Buses. Increase in bicycle trips have been estimated to be 5.88 million for Post-COVID scenario as compared to 1.1 million trips estimated for the Pre-COVID Scenario. Similar trend has also been observed for fuel consumption (reduction of 4.7%–11.8%) and corresponding vehicular emission (reduction of 14%). This study estimated the potential benefits of providing NMT friendly infrastructure considering the gradual shift influenced by locking/unlocking phases of COVID pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Advani, Mukti & Sharma, Niraj & Dhyani, Rajni, 2021. "Mobility change in Delhi due to COVID and its’ immediate and long term impact on demand with intervened non motorized transport friendly infrastructural policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 28-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:111:y:2021:i:c:p:28-37
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X21002092
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul, T.M. & Verma, Ashish, 2014. "A study of acceptable trip distances using walking and cycling in Bangalore," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 106-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiziana Campisi & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Andreas Nikiforiadis & Nikiforos Stamatiadis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Will the Effects of COVID-19 on Commuting and Daily Activities of the University Students Be Maintained? Evidence from a Small Town in Sicily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingyang Du & Lin Cheng, 2018. "Better Understanding the Characteristics and Influential Factors of Different Travel Patterns in Free-Floating Bike Sharing: Evidence from Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Verma, Meghna & Rahul, T.M. & Reddy, Peesari Vamshidhar & Verma, Ashish, 2016. "The factors influencing bicycling in the Bangalore city," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 29-40.
    3. Ranković Plazinić, Biljana & Jović, Jadranka, 2018. "Mobility and transport potential of elderly in differently accessible rural areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 169-180.
    4. Mingwei He & Jianbo Li & Zhuangbin Shi & Yang Liu & Chunyan Shuai & Jie Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Nonlinear and Threshold Effects of Travel Distance on the Travel Mode Choice across Different Groups: An Empirical Study of Guiyang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Ma, Xinwei & Ji, Yanjie & Yuan, Yufei & Van Oort, Niels & Jin, Yuchuan & Hoogendoorn, Serge, 2020. "A comparison in travel patterns and determinants of user demand between docked and dockless bike-sharing systems using multi-sourced data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 148-173.
    6. Pueboobpaphan, Rattaphol & Pueboobpaphan, Suthatip & Sukhotra, Suthasinee, 2022. "Acceptable walking distance to transit stations in Bangkok, Thailand: Application of a stated preference technique," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Ji, Shujuan & Wang, Xin & Lyu, Tao & Liu, Xiaojie & Wang, Yuanqing & Heinen, Eva & Sun, Zhenwei, 2022. "Understanding cycling distance according to the prediction of the XGBoost and the interpretation of SHAP: A non-linear and interaction effect analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Verma, Meghna & Rahul, T.M. & Vinayak, Pragun & Verma, Ashish, 2018. "Influence of childhood and adulthood attitudinal perceptions on bicycle usage in the Bangalore city," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 94-105.
    9. Gupta, Akshay & Bivina, G.R. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2022. "Does neighborhood design matter for walk access to metro stations? An integrated SEM-Hybrid discrete mode choice approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-77.
    10. Mendiate, Classio Joao & Nkurunziza, Alphonse & Machanguana, Constancio Augusto & Bernardo, Roberto, 2022. "Pedestrian travel behaviour and urban form: Comparing two small Mozambican cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Chen, Yulin, 2019. "Neighborhood form and residents' walking and biking distance to food markets: Evidence from Beijing, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 340-349.
    12. Roy, Subhojit & Basu, Debasis, 2020. "Selection of intervention areas for improving travel condition of walk-accessed bus users with a focus on their accessibility: An experience in Bhubaneswar," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 29-39.
    13. Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza & Eluru, Naveen, 2015. "Analysing bicycle-sharing system user destination choice preferences: Chicago’s Divvy system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 53-64.
    14. Todor Kesarovski & Fabio Hernández-Palacio, 2023. "Time, the other dimension of urban form: Measuring the relationship between urban density and accessibility to grocery shops in the 10-minute city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 44-59, January.
    15. Karthika, P.S. & Kedar, Vedankur & Verma, Ashish, 2022. "A walk accessibility-based approach to assess crowd management in mass religious gatherings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    16. Rahul, T.M. & Verma, Ashish, 2017. "The influence of stratification by motor-vehicle ownership on the impact of built environment factors in Indian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 40-51.
    17. David S Vale & Mauro Pereira, 2017. "The influence of the impedance function on gravity-based pedestrian accessibility measures: A comparative analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(4), pages 740-763, July.
    18. Abolfazl Dehghanmongabadi & Åžebnem HoÅŸkara, 2020. "Determinative Variables Toward Promoting Use of Active Modes of Transportation: Enhancing Level of Sustainable Mobility in Communities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:111:y:2021:i:c:p:28-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.