IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v202y2025ics1366554525003539.html

Integrated optimization of dynamic deployment and scheduling for rail-mounted gantry cranes in sea-rail intermodal port with on-dock rails

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Wenqian
  • Wang, Li
  • Yan, Baicheng
  • Zhu, Xiaoning
  • Liu, Zheng

Abstract

The railway operation area at the sea-rail intermodal port provides the necessary infrastructure for the seamless connection of railway and water transportation, thereby attracting increased railway container flows to the port. Rail-mounted gantry cranes (RMGCs), as the primary handling equipment in this area, play a pivotal role in facilitating swift transshipment of sea-rail intermodal containers. To address the fluctuating workload caused by train arrivals and departures, as well as the time constraints associated with loading and unloading operations, we develop an integrated optimization model for the dynamic deployment and scheduling of RMGCs. This model generates an optimal RMGC profile by effectively allocating crane capacity across both temporal and spatial dimensions. Decision-making regarding dynamic space partitioning, task assignment, and task sequencing is achieved hierarchically through a logic-based Benders decomposition framework, incorporating A* and heuristic strategies for single crane scheduling. Through case analysis, we discuss the performance of various algorithmic variants and the impact of time partitioning on algorithm efficiency. Additionally, we analyze the advantages of employing a flexible number of RMGCs and dynamic task partitioning strategies. Finally, we examine the effects of buffer time settings and train operational characteristics on the RMGC profile. The results indicate that the proposed dynamic deployment and scheduling approach for RMGCs can adapt to variations in workload and different train characteristics, leading to an optimized RMGC profile that minimizes unnecessary equipment mobilization while ensuring timely task completion.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Wenqian & Wang, Li & Yan, Baicheng & Zhu, Xiaoning & Liu, Zheng, 2025. "Integrated optimization of dynamic deployment and scheduling for rail-mounted gantry cranes in sea-rail intermodal port with on-dock rails," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003539
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525003539
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kress, Dominik & Meiswinkel, Sebastian & Pesch, Erwin, 2015. "The Partitioning Min–Max Weighted Matching Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 745-754.
    2. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Fliedner, Malte, 2012. "Determining crane areas for balancing workload among interfering and noninterfering cranes," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 79437, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Xiaoling & Huang, Huijung & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Logic-based Benders decomposition method for the seru scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup time and DeJong’s learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 866-877.
    4. Raymond K. Cheung & Chung-Lun Li & Wuqin Lin, 2002. "Interblock Crane Deployment in Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 79-93, February.
    5. Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2017. "Crane scheduling in railway yards: an analysis of computational complexity," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 507-526, October.
    6. He, Junliang & Chang, Daofang & Mi, Weijian & Yan, Wei, 2010. "A hybrid parallel genetic algorithm for yard crane scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 136-155, January.
    7. Nils Boysen & Simon Emde & Malte Fliedner, 2012. "Determining crane areas for balancing workload among interfering and noninterfering cranes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(8), pages 656-662, December.
    8. Zhang, Chuqian & Wan, Yat-wah & Liu, Jiyin & Linn, Richard J., 2002. "Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 537-555, July.
    9. Sun, Defeng & Tang, Lixin & Baldacci, Roberto, 2019. "A Benders decomposition-based framework for solving quay crane scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 504-515.
    10. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Kellner, Michael, 2010. "Determining fixed crane areas in rail-rail transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1005-1016, November.
    11. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2010. "Determining crane areas in intermodal transshipment yards: The yard partition problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 336-342, July.
    12. Ng, W. C., 2005. "Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 64-78, July.
    13. Ming Zeng & Wenming Cheng & Peng Guo, 2017. "Modelling and Metaheuristic for Gantry Crane Scheduling and Storage Space Allocation Problem in Railway Container Terminals," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, November.
    14. Schulz, Arne & Fliedner, Malte & Fiedrich, Benedikt & Pfeiffer, Christian, 2021. "Levelling crane workload in multi-yard rail-road container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 941-954.
    15. Xi Guo & Shell Ying Huang, 2012. "Dynamic Space and Time Partitioning for Yard Crane Workload Management in Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 134-148, February.
    16. Jiang, Xin Jia & Jin, Jian Gang, 2017. "A branch-and-price method for integrated yard crane deployment and container allocation in transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-75.
    17. Wang, Mengyao & Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Aihu, 2022. "A cluster-based yard template design integrated with yard crane deployment using a placement heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Mateusz Cichenski & Florian Jaehn & Grzegorz Pawlak & Erwin Pesch & Gaurav Singh & Jacek Blazewicz, 2017. "An integrated model for the transshipment yard scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-65, February.
    19. Lennart Zey & Dirk Briskorn & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Twin-crane scheduling during seaside workload peaks with a dedicated handshake area," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 3-34, February.
    20. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    21. Li Wang & Xiaoning Zhu, 2019. "Container Loading Optimization in Rail–Truck Intermodal Terminals Considering Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    22. Yu, Dayong & Li, Dong & Sha, Mei & Zhang, Dali, 2019. "Carbon-efficient deployment of electric rubber-tyred gantry cranes in container terminals with workload uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 552-569.
    23. Feifeng Zheng & Xiaoyi Man & Feng Chu & Ming Liu & Chengbin Chu, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming for single yard crane scheduling with uncertain release times of retrieval tasks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(13), pages 4132-4147, July.
    24. Alena Otto & Xiyu Li & Erwin Pesch, 2017. "Two-Way Bounded Dynamic Programming Approach for Operations Planning in Transshipment Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 325-342, February.
    25. Gang Ren & Xiaohan Wang & Jiaxin Cai & Shujuan Guo, 2021. "Allocation and Scheduling of Handling Resources in the Railway Container Terminal Based on Crossing Crane Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    26. Jiang, Xin Jia & Yang, Xiao Ming, 2023. "A column generation approach for the crane scheduling with sidekick in a perpendicular automated yard block," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    27. Li, Wenkai & Wu, Yong & Petering, M.E.H. & Goh, Mark & Souza, Robert de, 2009. "Discrete time model and algorithms for container yard crane scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 165-172, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schulz, Arne & Fliedner, Malte & Fiedrich, Benedikt & Pfeiffer, Christian, 2021. "Levelling crane workload in multi-yard rail-road container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 941-954.
    2. Liu, Wenqian & Zhu, Xiaoning & Wang, Li & Li, Siyu, 2024. "Flexible yard crane scheduling for mixed railway and road container operations in sea-rail intermodal ports with the sharing storage yard," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Basallo-Triana, Mario José & Bravo-Bastidas, Juan José & Vidal-Holguín, Carlos Julio, 2022. "A rail-road transshipment yard picture," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Damla Kizilay & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2021. "A comprehensive review of quay crane scheduling, yard operations and integrations thereof in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-42, March.
    5. Yu, Dayong & Li, Dong & Sha, Mei & Zhang, Dali, 2019. "Carbon-efficient deployment of electric rubber-tyred gantry cranes in container terminals with workload uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 552-569.
    6. Gang Ren & Xiaohan Wang & Jiaxin Cai & Shujuan Guo, 2021. "Allocation and Scheduling of Handling Resources in the Railway Container Terminal Based on Crossing Crane Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Meisel, Frank, 2017. "A generalized classification scheme for crane scheduling with interference," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 343-357.
    8. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Xiao-Ming Yang & Xin-Jia Jiang, 2020. "Yard Crane Scheduling in the Ground Trolley-Based Automated Container Terminal," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(02), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Yong Wu & Wenkai Li & Matthew E. H. Petering & Mark Goh & Robert de Souza, 2015. "Scheduling Multiple Yard Cranes with Crane Interference and Safety Distance Requirement," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 990-1005, November.
    11. Jiang, Xin Jia & Jin, Jian Gang, 2017. "A branch-and-price method for integrated yard crane deployment and container allocation in transshipment yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 62-75.
    12. Liu, Baoli & Wang, Fei & Sheng, Dian & Zhang, Xiaoju & Zheng, Jianfeng & Song, Dongping, 2026. "Scheduling heterogeneous yard cranes for port decarbonization: power constraints, crane interference, and safety distances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    13. Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Gilbert Laporte & Yugang Yu & René de Koster, 2015. "Scheduling Twin Yard Cranes in a Container Block," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 686-705, August.
    14. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Udding, Jan Tijmen, 2014. "An exact method for scheduling a yard crane," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 431-447.
    15. Xin Jia Jiang & Yanhua Xu & Chenhao Zhou & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2018. "Frame Trolley Dispatching Algorithm for the Frame Bridge Based Automated Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 722-737, June.
    16. Fotuhi, Fateme & Huynh, Nathan & Vidal, Jose M. & Xie, Yuanchang, 2013. "Modeling yard crane operators as reinforcement learning agents," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 3-12.
    17. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    18. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    19. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.
    20. Stefan Fedtke & Nils Boysen, 2017. "Gantry crane and shuttle car scheduling in modern rail–rail transshipment yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 473-503, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:202:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.