IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v146y2021ics1366554520308577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waterway maintenance budget allocation in a multimodal network

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoudzadeh, Ahmadreza
  • Khodakarami, Mohammadadel
  • Ma, Chaolun
  • Mitchell, Kenneth Ned
  • Wang, Xiubin Bruce
  • Zhang, Yunlong

Abstract

The U.S. inland waterway system has more than 11,000 miles of maintained navigation channel, which carries a significant percentage of the national freight total. Maintenance operations, including dredging and lock and dam maintenance/repair, are important to ensuring the effective and efficient operation of the inland marine transportation system. This study specifically deals with maintenance fund allocation to these projects. It proposes a multimodal approach to formulate the waterway maintenance problem in a network that considers rivers, locks/dams, highways and railways. The random effects of channel infilling known as shoaling are also considered. Maintenance on locks and dams reduces the delay therein, the cost of which is also considered in the model. The solution identifies maintenance projects to fund with an objective to serve the OD demand and minimize the total shipping costs on the network. The model is tested using data from the Ohio River Basin network. The proposed model is effective, and the result indicates a trade-off between lock/dam maintenance versus channel dredging. A distinct feature of this study is its explicit modeling of the interdependency between projects in realizing the system benefits as well as the random shoaling effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoudzadeh, Ahmadreza & Khodakarami, Mohammadadel & Ma, Chaolun & Mitchell, Kenneth Ned & Wang, Xiubin Bruce & Zhang, Yunlong, 2021. "Waterway maintenance budget allocation in a multimodal network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s1366554520308577
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554520308577
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahadi, Khatereh & Sullivan, Kelly M. & Mitchell, Kenneth Ned, 2018. "Budgeting maintenance dredging projects under uncertainty to improve the inland waterway network performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 63-87.
    2. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl & Richard D. Taylor, 2011. "Impacts of Lock Capacity Expansion on Delay Costs for Grain Shipped on the Mississippi River," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 45(1), pages 129-154, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng, 2022. "A demand-based framework for resilience assessment of multistate networks under disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce, 2015. "Risk analysis in port competition for containerized imports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 743-753.
    2. Di Zhang & Xinping Yan & Zaili Yang & Jin Wang, 2014. "An accident data–based approach for congestion risk assessment of inland waterways: A Yangtze River case," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 176-188, April.
    3. Bian, Zheyong & Bai, Yun & Douglas, W. Scott & Maher, Ali & Liu, Xiang, 2022. "Multi-year planning for optimal navigation channel dredging and dredged material management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Feng, Xuejun & Hu, Sangen & Gu, Weihua & Jin, Xin & Lu, Yuan, 2020. "A simulation-based approach for assessing seaside infrastructure improvement measures for large marine crude oil terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Ji, Bin & Yuan, Xiaohui & Yuan, Yanbin & Lei, Xiaohui & Fernando, Tyrone & Iu, Herbert H.C., 2019. "Exact and heuristic methods for optimizing lock-quay system in inland waterway," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 740-755.
    6. Lijuan Yang & Eldon Y. Li & Yu Zhang, 2020. "Pricing and Subsidy Models for Transshipment Sustainability in the Three Gorges Dam Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    7. T. Edward Yu & Bijay P. Sharma & Burton C. English, 2019. "Investigating Lock Delay on the Upper Mississippi River: a Spatial Panel Analysis," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 275-291, March.
    8. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce, 2012. "Congestion, port expansion and spatial competition for US container imports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1121-1136.
    9. Yan, Minhao & Ge, Houtian & Gomez, Miguel I., 2023. "Risk Management Strategy of Food Safety: The Case of the US Fresh Produce Supply Chain," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335580, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Barkley, Aaron & Mcleod, Kael, 2022. "Congestion and consolidation: An empirical study of a barge shipping merger," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:146:y:2021:i:c:s1366554520308577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.