IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The inverse power transformation logit and dogit mode choice models

  • Gaudry, Marc J.I.
Registered author(s):

    This paper explores the properties of inverse Box-Cox and Box-Tukey transformations applied to the exponential functions of logit and dogit mode choice models. It is suggested that inverse power transformations allow for the introduction of modeler ignorance in the models and solve the "thin equal tails" problem of the logit model; it is also shown that they allow for asymmetry of response functions in both logit and dogit models by introducing alternative-specific parameters which make cross elasticities of demand among alternatives generally asymmetric. In the dogit model, modeler ignorance and consumer captivity remain conceptually distinct. Standard logit and dogit models appear as very special "perfect knowledge" cases in broad spectra of models which also include, among others, the reciprocal extreme value or log-Weibull variants. These improvements over the simple symmetric-thin-equal-tail-perfect-knowledge logit and the symmetric-pure-captivity dogit are achieved at the cost of introducing at the most two new parameters per alternative considered in the original logit and dogit mode choice models.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V99-466FJW7-7S/2/4fe1cf3a2eb551c3a634e70b80041a59
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

    Volume (Year): 15 (1981)
    Issue (Month): 2 (April)
    Pages: 97-103

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:15:y:1981:i:2:p:97-103
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description

    Order Information: Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional
    Web: https://shop.elsevier.com/order?id=548&ref=548_01_ooc_1&version=01

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:15:y:1981:i:2:p:97-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.