IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v139y2020icp64-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An MIP-based heuristic solution approach for the locomotive assignment problem focussing on (dis-)connecting processes

Author

Listed:
  • Scheffler, Martin
  • Neufeld, Janis S.
  • Hölscher, Michael

Abstract

Arising from a practical problem in European rail freight transport we present a heuristic solution approach that is based on a new generalized mixed integer problem formulation for the Locomotive Assignment Problem. A main focus is on the one hand on the (dis-)connecting processes between cars and locomotives and on the other hand on combining two or more locomotives, i.e., the process of building and busting consists (combination of locomotives). Furthermore, regional limitations for running certain types of locomotives and technical conditions for combining locomotives are taken into account. A generalized solution framework is developed that allows a gradual restricting of the solution space and enables an analysis and comparison of different solution procedures. Testing these for a real-world network as well as several newly generated instances shows that the framework outperforms previous approaches in the literature. Thus a suitable solution method for an application in practice is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Scheffler, Martin & Neufeld, Janis S. & Hölscher, Michael, 2020. "An MIP-based heuristic solution approach for the locomotive assignment problem focussing on (dis-)connecting processes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 64-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:139:y:2020:i:c:p:64-80
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261520303295
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Caprara & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo & Matteo Fischetti, 1998. "Modeling and Solving the Crew Rostering Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 820-830, December.
    2. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Jaehn, Florian & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Shunting yard operations: Theoretical aspects and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 1-14.
    3. Armin Fügenschuh & Henning Homfeld & Andreas Huck & Alexander Martin & Zhi Yuan, 2008. "Scheduling Locomotives and Car Transfers in Freight Transport," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 478-491, November.
    4. Torsten Klug, 2018. "Freight Train Routing," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Ralf Borndörfer & Torsten Klug & Leonardo Lamorgese & Carlo Mannino & Markus Reuther & Thomas Schlec (ed.), Handbook of Optimization in the Railway Industry, chapter 0, pages 73-91, Springer.
    5. Lukas Bach & Twan Dollevoet & Dennis Huisman, 2016. "Integrating Timetabling and Crew Scheduling at a Freight Railway Operator," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 878-891, August.
    6. Silke Jütte & Marc Albers & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Knut Haase, 2011. "Optimizing Railway Crew Scheduling at DB Schenker," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 109-122, April.
    7. Endong Zhu & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau, 2014. "Scheduled Service Network Design for Freight Rail Transportation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 383-400, April.
    8. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Jian Liu & James B. Orlin & Dushyant Sharma & Larry A. Shughart, 2005. "Solving Real-Life Locomotive-Scheduling Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 503-517, November.
    9. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2018. "Integrated train timetabling and locomotive assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 573-593.
    10. Markus Reuther & Thomas Schlechte, 2018. "Optimization of Rolling Stock Rotations," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Ralf Borndörfer & Torsten Klug & Leonardo Lamorgese & Carlo Mannino & Markus Reuther & Thomas Schlec (ed.), Handbook of Optimization in the Railway Industry, chapter 0, pages 213-241, Springer.
    11. Bach, Lukas & Gendreau, Michel & Wøhlk, Sanne, 2015. "Freight railway operator timetabling and engine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 309-319.
    12. Jean-François Cordeau & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo, 1998. "A Survey of Optimization Models for Train Routing and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 380-404, November.
    13. Nourbakhsh, Seyed Mohammad & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2010. "Optimal fueling strategies for locomotive fleets in railroad networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1104-1114, September.
    14. Ziarati, Koorush & Soumis, Francois & Desrosiers, Jacques & Gelinas, Sylvie & Saintonge, Andre, 1997. "Locomotive assignment with heterogeneous consists at CN North America," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 281-292, March.
    15. Alberto Caprara & Matteo Fischetti & Paolo Toth, 2002. "Modeling and Solving the Train Timetabling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 851-861, October.
    16. Cynthia Barnhart & Hong Jin & Pamela H. Vance, 2000. "Railroad Blocking: A Network Design Application," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 603-614, August.
    17. Balachandran Vaidyanathan & Ravindra K. Ahuja, 2015. "Locomotive Scheduling Problem," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Bruce W. Patty (ed.), Handbook of Operations Research Applications at Railroads, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 43-56, Springer.
    18. Haahr, Jørgen T. & Wagenaar, Joris C. & Veelenturf, Lucas P. & Kroon, Leo G., 2016. "A comparison of two exact methods for passenger railway rolling stock (re)scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 15-32.
    19. Jean-François Cordeau & François Soumis & Jacques Desrosiers, 2001. "Simultaneous Assignment of Locomotives and Cars to Passenger Trains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 531-548, August.
    20. Piu, F. & Prem Kumar, V. & Bierlaire, M. & Speranza, M.G., 2015. "Introducing a preliminary consists selection in the locomotive assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 217-237.
    21. Kirsten Hoffmann & Udo Buscher & Janis Sebastian Neufeld & Felix Tamke, 2017. "Solving Practical Railway Crew Scheduling Problems with Attendance Rates," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(3), pages 147-159, June.
    22. Vaidyanathan, Balachandran & Ahuja, Ravindra K. & Liu, Jian & Shughart, Larry A., 2008. "Real-life locomotive planning: New formulations and computational results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 147-168, February.
    23. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Krishna C. Jha & Jian Liu, 2007. "Solving Real-Life Railroad Blocking Problems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 404-419, October.
    24. Martin Joborn & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau & Kaj Holmberg & Jan T. Lundgren, 2004. "Economies of Scale in Empty Freight Car Distribution in Scheduled Railways," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 121-134, May.
    25. Amar Kumar Narisetty & Jean-Philippe P. Richard & David Ramcharan & Deby Murphy & Gayle Minks & Jim Fuller, 2008. "An Optimization Model for Empty Freight Car Assignment at Union Pacific Railroad," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 89-102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frisch, Sarah & Hungerländer, Philipp & Jellen, Anna & Primas, Bernhard & Steininger, Sebastian & Weinberger, Dominic, 2021. "Solving a real-world Locomotive Scheduling Problem with Maintenance Constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 386-409.
    2. Pan, Hanchuan & Yang, Lixing & Liang, Zhe & Yang, Hai, 2024. "New Exact Algorithm for the integrated train timetabling and rolling stock circulation planning problem with stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 906-929.
    3. Zhou, Housheng & Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing & Shi, Jungang & Pan, Hanchuan & Gao, Yuan, 2022. "Joint optimization of train timetabling and rolling stock circulation planning: A novel flexible train composition mode," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 352-385.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Otto, Alena & Boysen, Nils, 2021. "Rail platooning: Scheduling trains along a rail corridor with rapid-shunting facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 760-778.
    2. Xu, Xiaoming & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2018. "Integrated train timetabling and locomotive assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 573-593.
    3. Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari & Clark Cheng & Sourav Das & Ricardo Fiorillo & Warren B. Powell, 2016. "From Single Commodity to Multiattribute Models for Locomotive Optimization: A Comparison of Optimal Integer Programming and Approximate Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 366-389, May.
    4. Alena Otto & Erwin Pesch, 2017. "Operation of shunting yards: train-to-yard assignment problem," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(4), pages 465-486, May.
    5. Chen, Chongshuang & Dollevoet, Twan & Zhao, Jun, 2018. "One-block train formation in large-scale railway networks: An exact model and a tree-based decomposition algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-30.
    6. Xiao, Jie & Pachl, Joern & Lin, Boliang & Wang, Jiaxi, 2018. "Solving the block-to-train assignment problem using the heuristic approach based on the genetic algorithm and tabu search," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 148-171.
    7. Camilo Ortiz-Astorquiza & Jean-François Cordeau & Emma Frejinger, 2021. "The Locomotive Assignment Problem with Distributed Power at the Canadian National Railway Company," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 510-531, March.
    8. Frisch, Sarah & Hungerländer, Philipp & Jellen, Anna & Primas, Bernhard & Steininger, Sebastian & Weinberger, Dominic, 2021. "Solving a real-world Locomotive Scheduling Problem with Maintenance Constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 386-409.
    9. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2019. "Literature Review of Locomotive Assignment Problem from Service Operations Perspective: The Case of Indian Railways," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 74-86, January.
    10. Canca, David & Barrena, Eva, 2018. "The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 115-138.
    11. Michael F. Gorman & John-Paul Clarke & Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Michael Hewitt & René de Koster & Debjit Roy, 2014. "State of the Practice: A Review of the Application of OR/MS in Freight Transportation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 535-554, December.
    12. Ruf, Moritz & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2021. "Adaptive large neighborhood search for integrated planning in railroad classification yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 26-51.
    13. Vaidyanathan, Balachandran & Ahuja, Ravindra K. & Liu, Jian & Shughart, Larry A., 2008. "Real-life locomotive planning: New formulations and computational results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 147-168, February.
    14. Chen, C. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Zhao, J., 2017. "One-block train formation in large-scale railway networks: An exact model and a tree-based decomposition algorithm," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI-2017-32, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. G Lulli & U Pietropaoli & N Ricciardi, 2011. "Service network design for freight railway transportation: the Italian case," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(12), pages 2107-2119, December.
    16. Prashant Premkumar & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2022. "Locomotive assignment problem: integrating the strategic, tactical and operational level aspects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 867-898, August.
    17. Alena Otto & Erwin Pesch, 2019. "The train-to-yard assignment problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(2), pages 549-580, June.
    18. Endong Zhu & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau, 2014. "Scheduled Service Network Design for Freight Rail Transportation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 383-400, April.
    19. Ralf Borndörfer & Torsten Klug & Thomas Schlechte & Armin Fügenschuh & Thilo Schang & Hanno Schülldorf, 2016. "The Freight Train Routing Problem for Congested Railway Networks with Mixed Traffic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 408-423, May.
    20. Warren B. Powell & Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari & Coleman Lawrence & Clark Cheng & Sourav Das & Ricardo Fiorillo, 2014. "Locomotive Planning at Norfolk Southern: An Optimizing Simulator Using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 567-578, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:139:y:2020:i:c:p:64-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.