IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Factors affecting European privatisation and deregulation policies in local public transport: The evidence from Scandinavia

Listed author(s):
  • Andersen, Bjørn
Registered author(s):

    This paper concerns itself with the question of the forces behind privitisation and regulatory reform in local public transport in Europe. Two different approaches to the explanation of the changes are presented: the political and the economic. The paper gives a review of current discussions and sets forward the hypothesis that even though there is much evidence to support a process of privatization and deregulation (with a vague rationale), much can be seen as a political process; the real objectives of change can be found in policies in advocating the need for reduced public expenditure and subsidies. Thus, the ideological side of change is weaker than the financial arguments. The paper discusses the process in Europe on the basis of an all-European survey, and concludes that there is no general trend towards deregulation in local public transport in Europe, but a trend towards the use of franchising in certain countries such as Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. The Scandinavian experience is dealt with and the results of change of policies are analyzed. The wider implications of regulatory reform in Europe are seen in the context of the development of the single European market, and the need for transport policies to account for environmental problems. All these factors indicate that there will be some change, but more cautions ones, and this again indicates that a franchising solution may be more likely than full deregulation in the European bus industry.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

    Volume (Year): 26 (1992)
    Issue (Month): 2 (March)
    Pages: 179-191

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:26:y:1992:i:2:p:179-191
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:26:y:1992:i:2:p:179-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.