IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v73y2008i3p449-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plant–herbivore interactions mediated by plant toxicity

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Zhilan
  • Liu, Rongsong
  • DeAngelis, Donald L.

Abstract

We explore the impact of plant toxicity on the dynamics of a plant–herbivore interaction, such as that of a mammalian browser and its plant forage species, by studying a mathematical model that includes a toxin-determined functional response. In this functional response, the traditional Holling Type 2 response is modified to include the negative effect of toxin on herbivore growth, which can overwhelm the positive effect of biomass ingestion at sufficiently high plant toxicant concentrations. Two types of consumption decisions of the herbivore are considered. One of these (Case 1) incorporates the adaptation of the herbivore to control its rate of consumption of plant items when that is likely to lead to levels of toxicity that more than offset the marginal gain to the herbivore of consuming more plant biomass, while the other (Case 2) simply assumes that, although the herbivore’s rate of ingestion of plant biomass is negatively affected by increasing ingestion of toxicant relative to the load it can safely deal with, the herbivore is not able to prevent detrimental or even lethal levels of toxicant intake. A primary result of this work is that these differences in behavior lead to dramatically different outcomes, summarized in bifurcation diagrams. In Case 2, a wide variety of dynamics may occur due to the interplay of Holling Type 2 dynamics and the effect of the plant toxicant. These dynamics include the occurrence of bistability, in which both a periodic solution and the herbivore-extinction equilibrium are attractors, as well the possibility of a homoclinic bifurcation. Whether the herbivore goes to extinction in the bistable case depends on initial conditions of herbivore and plant biomasses. For relatively low herbivore resource acquisition rates, the toxicant effect increases the likelihood of ‘paradox of enrichment’ type limit cycle oscillations, but at higher resource acquisition rates, the toxicant may decrease the likelihood of these cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Zhilan & Liu, Rongsong & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2008. "Plant–herbivore interactions mediated by plant toxicity," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 449-459.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:73:y:2008:i:3:p:449-459
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580907001347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2007.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang, Nan & Wu, Qidong & Wan, Aying, 2021. "Spatiotemporal patterns of a diffusive plant–herbivore model with toxin-determined functional responses: Multiple bifurcations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 337-356.
    2. Feng, Zhilan & Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A. & DeAngelis, Donald L. & Schmidt, Jennifer & Barga, Matthew & Zheng, Yiqiang & Ahmad Tamrin, Muhammad Hanis B. & Olson, Mark & Glaser, Tim & Kielland, Knut & Ch, 2012. "Plant toxins and trophic cascades alter fire regime and succession on a boreal forest landscape," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 79-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:73:y:2008:i:3:p:449-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.