IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v103y2015icp27-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looking down in the ancestral selection graph: A probabilistic approach to the common ancestor type distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Lenz, Ute
  • Kluth, Sandra
  • Baake, Ellen
  • Wakolbinger, Anton

Abstract

In a (two-type) Wright–Fisher diffusion with directional selection and two-way mutation, let x denote today’s frequency of the beneficial type, and given x, let h(x) be the probability that, among all individuals of today’s population, the individual whose progeny will eventually take over in the population is of the beneficial type. Fearnhead (2002) and Taylor (2007) obtained a series representation for h(x). We develop a construction that contains elements of both the ancestral selection graph and the lookdown construction and includes pruning of certain lines upon mutation. Besides being interesting in its own right, this construction allows a transparent derivation of the series coefficients of h(x) and gives them a probabilistic meaning.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenz, Ute & Kluth, Sandra & Baake, Ellen & Wakolbinger, Anton, 2015. "Looking down in the ancestral selection graph: A probabilistic approach to the common ancestor type distribution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 27-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:27-37
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.01.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580915000362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.01.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pokalyuk, Cornelia & Pfaffelhuber, Peter, 2013. "The ancestral selection graph under strong directional selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 25-33.
    2. Mano, Shuhei, 2009. "Duality, ancestral and diffusion processes in models with selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 164-175.
    3. Etheridge, A.M. & Griffiths, R.C., 2009. "A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 320-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. González Casanova, Adrián & Miró Pina, Verónica & Pardo, Juan Carlos, 2020. "The Wright–Fisher model with efficiency," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 33-46.
    2. Baake, E. & Esercito, L. & Hummel, S., 2023. "Lines of descent in a Moran model with frequency-dependent selection and mutation," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 409-457.
    3. Wirtz, Johannes & Wiehe, Thomas, 2019. "The Evolving Moran Genealogy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 94-105.
    4. Cordero, Fernando, 2017. "Common ancestor type distribution: A Moran model and its deterministic limit," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 590-621.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cordero, Fernando, 2017. "Common ancestor type distribution: A Moran model and its deterministic limit," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 590-621.
    2. Bossert, S. & Pfaffelhuber, P., 2018. "The fixation probability and time for a doubly beneficial mutant," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 128(12), pages 4018-4050.
    3. Kluth, Sandra & Baake, Ellen, 2013. "The Moran model with selection: Fixation probabilities, ancestral lines, and an alternative particle representation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 104-112.
    4. Vogl, Claus & Bergman, Juraj, 2015. "Inference of directional selection and mutation parameters assuming equilibrium," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 71-82.
    5. Vogl, Claus & Clemente, Florian, 2012. "The allele-frequency spectrum in a decoupled Moran model with mutation, drift, and directional selection, assuming small mutation rates," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 197-209.
    6. Desai, Michael M. & Nicolaisen, Lauren E. & Walczak, Aleksandra M. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2012. "The structure of allelic diversity in the presence of purifying selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 144-157.
    7. Burden, Conrad J. & Tang, Yurong, 2017. "Rate matrix estimation from site frequency data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 23-33.
    8. Malaguti, Giulia & Singh, Param Priya & Isambert, Hervé, 2014. "On the retention of gene duplicates prone to dominant deleterious mutations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 38-51.
    9. Frank Hollander & Shubhamoy Nandan, 2022. "Spatially Inhomogeneous Populations with Seed-Banks: I. Duality, Existence and Clustering," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1795-1841, September.
    10. Wakeley, John & Sargsyan, Ori, 2009. "The conditional ancestral selection graph with strong balancing selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 355-364.
    11. Corujo, Josué, 2021. "Dynamics of a Fleming–Viot type particle system on the cycle graph," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 57-91.
    12. Der, Ricky & Epstein, Charles L. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2011. "Generalized population models and the nature of genetic drift," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 80-99.
    13. González Casanova, Adrián & Miró Pina, Verónica & Pardo, Juan Carlos, 2020. "The Wright–Fisher model with efficiency," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 33-46.
    14. Griffiths, Robert C. & Jenkins, Paul A. & Lessard, Sabin, 2016. "A coalescent dual process for a Wright–Fisher diffusion with recombination and its application to haplotype partitioning," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 126-138.
    15. Griffiths, Robert C. & Jenkins, Paul A. & Spanò, Dario, 2018. "Wright–Fisher diffusion bridges," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 67-77.
    16. Etheridge, Alison M. & Griffiths, Robert C. & Taylor, Jesse E., 2010. "A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection, and the lambda coalescent limit," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 77-92.
    17. Etheridge, A.M. & Griffiths, R.C., 2009. "A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 320-330.
    18. Vogl, Claus & Mikula, Lynette C. & Burden, Conrad J., 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimators for scaled mutation rates in an equilibrium mutation–drift model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 106-118.
    19. Jüri Lember & Chris Watkins, 2022. "An Evolutionary Model that Satisfies Detailed Balance," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-37, March.
    20. Pokalyuk, Cornelia & Wakolbinger, Anton, 2020. "Maintenance of diversity in a hierarchical host–parasite model with balancing selection and reinfection," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 1119-1158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:103:y:2015:i:c:p:27-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.