IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v74y2023ics0160791x23001008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmented body surveillance: Human microchip implantations and the omnipresent threat of function creep

Author

Listed:
  • Maras, Marie-Helen
  • Miranda, Michelle D.

Abstract

Implanted microchips can store users' medical, financial, and other personal information, and provide users with easy and quick access to various locations and items. While adopted for their convenience outside of the healthcare sector, these invasive, semi-permanent implantable devices create augmented bodies that can be subject to ubiquitous surveillance. Situating human microchip implantations within surveillance literature, we draw from neoliberal perspectives of surveillance to examine augmented bodies, particularly as sources for market activity and as subjects of social control and sorting when these bodies are used as access control mechanisms, payment methods, and tracking means in employment, residential, commercial, and transportation sectors. History has demonstrated time and time again how unfettered technology applications and uses have led to real and/or perceived misuse by private and public sectors. Through the lens of function creep, we identify a pattern of expansion of applications and uses of technology beyond those originally intended across new technologies, such as DNA genetic genealogy databases, IoT wearables, and COVID-19 contact tracing apps, and provide illustrative examples of function creep, particularly the use of these technologies in criminal investigations and prosecutions despite not being intended or marketed for such use. By demonstrating the lack of clearly defined boundaries in the applications and uses of various new technologies and their associated data, and the ways they were misused, we demonstrate how human microchip implantations are headed on a similar path. The current and potential future uses of this technology raise concerns about the absence of regulation, law, and policy barring or limiting its application and use in specific sectors, and the impact of this technology on users’ security, data protection, and privacy. Undeniably, the present and potential future functions, applications, uses, and extensions of human microchip implantations in various sectors warrant a proactive examination of their security, privacy, and data protection consequences and the implementation of proactive policies to regulate new and currently unregulated uses of this technology and its associated data within these sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Maras, Marie-Helen & Miranda, Michelle D., 2023. "Augmented body surveillance: Human microchip implantations and the omnipresent threat of function creep," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23001008
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23001008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuhaiber, Ahmed & Mashal, Ibrahim, 2019. "Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Andrés-Sánchez, Jorge de & Arias-Oliva, Mario & Pelegrín-Borondo, Jorge & Mohammad Almahameed, Ala’ Ali, 2021. "The influence of ethical judgements on acceptance and non-acceptance of wearables and insideables: Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Singh, Nidhi & Misra, Richa & Singh, Sonali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Khorana, Sangeeta, 2022. "Assessing the factors that influence the adoption of healthcare wearables by the older population using an extended PMT model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Wang, Victoria & Tucker, John V., 2021. "‘I am not a number’: Conceptualising identity in digital surveillance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. van der Waal, Nadine Elisa & de Wit, Jan & Bol, Nadine & Ebbers, Wolfgang & Hooft, Lotty & Metting, Esther & van der Laan, Laura Nynke, 2022. "Predictors of contact tracing app adoption: Integrating the UTAUT, HBM and contextual factors," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Seili SUDER & Andra SIIBAK, 2022. "Proportionate response to the COVID‐19 threat? Use of apps and other technologies for monitoring employees under the European Union's data protection framework," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(2), pages 315-335, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Jiaxin Chen & Ting Li & Hua You & Jingyu Wang & Xueqing Peng & Baoyi Chen, 2023. "Behavioral Interpretation of Willingness to Use Wearable Health Devices in Community Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Pal, Debajyoti & Zhang, Xiangmin & Siyal, Saeed, 2021. "Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Abumalloh, Rabab Ali & Samad, Sarminah & Alrizq, Mesfer & Alyami, Sultan & Abosaq, Hamad & Alghamdi, Abdullah & Akib, Noor Adelyna Mohammed, 2022. "Factors impacting customer purchase intention of smart home security systems: Social data analysis using machine learning techniques," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Furszyfer Del Rio, D.D., 2022. "Smart but unfriendly: Connected home products as enablers of conflict," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo & Ala Ali Almahameed & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2021. "Ethical Attitudes toward COVID-19 Passports: Evidences from Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Yoon, Sungjoon & Oh, Jongchul, 2022. "A theory-based approach to the usability of augmented reality technology: A cost-benefit perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Mashal, Ibrahim & Alsaryrah, Osama & Chung, Tein-Yaw & Yuan, Fong-Ching, 2020. "A multi-criteria analysis for an internet of things application recommendation system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Park, Hyeyoung K. & Chung, Joohyun & Ha, Jiyeon, 2023. "Acceptance of technology related to healthcare among older Korean adults in rural areas: A mixed-method study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Ronaghi, Mohammad Hossein & Forouharfar, Amir, 2020. "A contextualized study of the usage of the Internet of things (IoTs) in smart farming in a typical Middle Eastern country within the context of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Ho, Manh-Tung & Le, Ngoc-Thang B. & Mantello, Peter & Ho, Manh-Toan & Ghotbi, Nader, 2023. "Understanding the acceptance of emotional artificial intelligence in Japanese healthcare system: A cross-sectional survey of clinic visitors’ attitude," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    16. Aggarwal, Nitin & Albert, Leslie J. & Hill, Timothy R. & Rodan, Simon A., 2020. "Risk knowledge and concern as influences of purchase intention for internet of things devices," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. María Alesanco-Llorente & Eva Reinares-Lara & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo & Cristina Olarte-Pascual, 2023. "The mobile-assisted showroomer’s dilemma: where to buy? Actions to prevent sales leakage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Lihua Li & Chengdao Huang & Weijuan Li & Zhuxia Wei, 2022. "Booster or Stumbling Block? The Role of Environmental Regulation in the Coupling Path of Regional Innovation under the Porter Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:74:y:2023:i:c:s0160791x23001008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.