IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v69y2022ics0160791x22001051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics in the use of geospatial information in the Americas

Author

Listed:
  • Merodio Gómez, Paloma
  • Ramírez Santiago, Andrea
  • García Seco, Gabriela
  • Casanova, Rosario
  • MacKenzie, Denise
  • Tucker, Christopher

Abstract

During the last decade, the use of geospatial information in decision-making has reached an especially important role, which is why its production has increased considerably. The particularities that individual geospatial information presents with respect to other types of personal information, such as the linking of sensitive information, has begun to generate concerns regarding the privacy of information and individual surveillance, being increasingly difficult to guarantee and ensure its protection, while other ethical problems and risks related to its use arise. For this reason, the development and implementation of principles and guidelines of conduct has become an increasingly necessary component to address the ethical challenges associated with the use of geospatial information, in order to achieve a greater perception of its benefits and less perception of their risks. However, at present, there is no common set of global ethical principles to guide their responsible use. Therefore, to achieve this, it is important to know the advances at the global and regional level in the generation and implementation of principles and guidelines related to the ethical use of geospatial in various cultural and political contexts. In this way, this article aims to present, for the first time, the methodology developed, and the results obtained for the evaluation of the current state of the design and implementation of strategies aimed at achieving the ethical use of geospatial information in the region of the Americas. The results indicate that there is a need to strengthen the issue of the ethical use of geospatial data in the region, since, although it is beginning to be included in the government agenda, there is still little awareness among generators and users of geospatial information about the risks and consequences of its misuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Merodio Gómez, Paloma & Ramírez Santiago, Andrea & García Seco, Gabriela & Casanova, Rosario & MacKenzie, Denise & Tucker, Christopher, 2022. "Ethics in the use of geospatial information in the Americas," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:69:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001051
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22001051
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brey, Philip, 2018. "The strategic role of technology in a good society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-45.
    2. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Hough, Michelle G., 2009. "Keeping it to ourselves: Technology, privacy, and the loss of reserve," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 406-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "Privacy as an aggregate public good," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Kheirandish, Shadi & Funk, Mathias & Wensveen, Stephan & Verkerk, Maarten & Rauterberg, Matthias, 2020. "A comprehensive value framework for design," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Manuel E. Morales & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Azlan Amran, 2023. "Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1473-1494, May.
    4. Epting, Shane, 2021. "Vulnerable groups, virtual cities, and social isolation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Vujičić, Miroslav D. & Kennell, James & Stankov, Uglješa & Gretzel, Ulrike & Vasiljević, Đorđije A. & Morrison, Alastair M., 2022. "Keeping up with the drones! Techno-social dimensions of tourist drone videography," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Irwansyah,, 2020. "The social contractual utilitarianism of a digital village in rural Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J. & Heldeweg, Michiel A., 2022. "Safety and privacy regulations for unmanned aerial vehicles: A multiple comparative analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Nikolaos Karanasios & Antje Tandetzky & Antonella Reitano & Marco Fazio & Elena Stavrova, 2019. "Development: Crossing the Bridge Pondering Socio-Economic and Techno-Science," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 537-548, December.
    10. Yang, Xue, 2021. "Determinants of consumers’ continuance intention to use social recommender systems: A self-regulation perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Zhu, Xun & Pasch, Timothy J. & Bergstrom, Aaron, 2020. "Understanding the structure of risk belief systems concerning drone delivery: A network analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Yang, Hongjun & Zhang, Shengtai, 2022. "Social media affordances and fatigue: The role of privacy concerns, impression management concerns, and self-esteem," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Ayamga, Matthew & Akaba, Selorm & Nyaaba, Albert Apotele, 2021. "Multifaceted applicability of drones: A review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Hyunjae Daniel Shin & Richard Bull, 2019. "Three Dimensions of Design for Sustainable Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Joao J. M. Ferreira & Cristina Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2019. "The effects of technology transfers and institutional factors on economic growth: evidence from Europe and Oceania," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1505-1528, October.
    18. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Ilić, Damir & Milošević, Isidora & Ilić-Kosanović, Tatjana, 2022. "Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for smart city transformation: Case study Belgrade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Veghes Calin & Acatrinei Carmen & Dugulan Diana & Palade Marius, 2011. "A Marketing View Over The Role Of The Public Authorities In The Protection Of The Consumers' Private Space," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 811-816, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:69:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22001051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.