IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v106y2015icp287-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative residual Kullback–Leibler information with the progressively Type-II censored data

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Sangun
  • Pakyari, Reza

Abstract

We propose an extension of Kullback–Leibler information to the survival function, and generalize it to the censored case. We evaluate its performance as a goodness-of-fit test statistic with the progressively Type-II censored data. The new test is evaluated through Monte Carlo Simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Sangun & Pakyari, Reza, 2015. "Cumulative residual Kullback–Leibler information with the progressively Type-II censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 287-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:106:y:2015:i:c:p:287-294
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2015.07.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715215002709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2015.07.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sangun Park & Johan Lim, 2015. "On censored cumulative residual Kullback–Leibler information and goodness-of-fit test with type II censored data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 247-256, February.
    2. Park, Sangun & Rao, Murali & Shin, Dong Wan, 2012. "On cumulative residual Kullback–Leibler information," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(11), pages 2025-2032.
    3. Navarro, J. & Sunoj, S.M. & Linu, M.N., 2011. "Characterizations of bivariate models using dynamic Kullback-Leibler discrimination measures," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(11), pages 1594-1598, November.
    4. J. Navarro & S. M. Sunoj & M. N. Linu, 2014. "Characterizations of Bivariate Models Using Some Dynamic Conditional Information Divergence Measures," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1939-1948, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reza Pakyari & Ayman Baklizi, 2022. "On goodness-of-fit testing for Burr type X distribution under progressively type-II censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2249-2265, November.
    2. Sankaran, P.G. & Sunoj, S.M. & Nair, N. Unnikrishnan, 2016. "Kullback–Leibler divergence: A quantile approach," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 72-79.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Ghosh & Chanchal Kundu, 2018. "Chernoff distance for conditionally specified models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1061-1083, September.
    2. Amit Ghosh & Chanchal Kundu, 2019. "Bivariate extension of (dynamic) cumulative residual and past inaccuracy measures," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2225-2252, December.
    3. Asok K. Nanda & Shovan Chowdhury, 2021. "Shannon's Entropy and Its Generalisations Towards Statistical Inference in Last Seven Decades," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 167-185, April.
    4. Mao, Xuegeng & Shang, Pengjian & Wang, Jianing & Yin, Yi, 2020. "Fractional cumulative residual Kullback-Leibler information based on Tsallis entropy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. E.I., Abdul Sathar & K.V., Viswakala, 2019. "Non-parametric estimation of Kullback–Leibler discrimination information based on censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Sunoj, S.M. & Sankaran, P.G. & Nanda, Asok K., 2013. "Quantile based entropy function in past lifetime," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 366-372.
    7. Sunoj, S.M. & Sankaran, P.G., 2012. "Quantile based entropy function," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(6), pages 1049-1053.
    8. Benchong Li & Liya Fu, 2018. "Exact test of goodness of fit for binomial distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 851-860, September.
    9. Rajesh, G. & Abdul-Sathar, E.I. & Maya, R., 2015. "Local linear estimation of residual entropy function of conditional distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Majid Asadi & Karthik Devarajan & Nader Ebrahimi & Ehsan Soofi & Lauren Spirko‐Burns, 2022. "Elaboration Models with Symmetric Information Divergence," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 499-524, December.
    11. Nair Rohini S. & Abdul Sathar E. I., 2019. "Bivariate Dynamic Weighted Survival Entropy of Order 𝛼," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 34(2), pages 67-85, December.
    12. Matthieu Garcin, 2023. "Complexity measure, kernel density estimation, bandwidth selection, and the efficient market hypothesis," Working Papers hal-04102815, HAL.
    13. Chahkandi, M. & Noughabi, H. Alizadeh, 2016. "Testing exponentiality of the residual life, based on dynamic cumulative residual entropy," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Asadi, Majid & Ebrahimi, Nader & Soofi, Ehsan S., 2018. "Optimal hazard models based on partial information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 723-733.
    15. Matthieu Garcin, 2023. "Complexity measure, kernel density estimation, bandwidth selection, and the efficient market hypothesis," Papers 2305.13123, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:106:y:2015:i:c:p:287-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.