IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i5p652-654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A commentary on Marja Jylhä's "What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model"(69:3, 2009, 307-316)

Author

Listed:
  • Huisman, Martijn
  • Deeg, Dorly J.H.

Abstract

This is a commentary on Marja Jylhä's paper "What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Toward a unified conceptual model" (2009) published recently in this journal. In this commentary we address two issues that we believe the paper raises. Firstly, we react to the theory proposed by Jylhä about how individuals form an assessment of their own health. Secondly, we discuss what we believe amounts to an existing confusion about what self-rated health can and should be considered to measure. We conclude that the cognitive process that Jylhä introduces in her paper should be expanded to include external and internal states that influence the process illogically and irrationally, as well as a long-term ongoing component reflecting that people are continuously presented with health-relevant information during their lives and continuously evaluate and change their assessment of health according to this information. Further, we conclude that self-rated health should best be viewed as a measure of people's perception of their health rather than a measure of true health.

Suggested Citation

  • Huisman, Martijn & Deeg, Dorly J.H., 2010. "A commentary on Marja Jylhä's "What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model"(69:3, 2009, 307-316)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 652-654, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:652-654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00756-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marino, Francesca & Nunziata, Luca, 2022. "Radioactive decay, health and social capital: Lessons from the Chernobyl experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 315-340.
    2. Falconer, James & Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie, 2017. "Pathway from poor self-rated health to mortality: Explanatory power of disease diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 227-236.
    3. Natalia Golini & Viviana Egidi, 2016. "The Latent Dimensions of Poor Self-Rated Health: How Chronic Diseases, Functional and Emotional Dimensions Interact Influencing Self-Rated Health in Italian Elderly," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 321-339, August.
    4. Erdogan-Ciftci, Esen & van Doorslaer, Eddy & Bago d'Uva, Teresa & van Lenthe, Frank, 2010. "Do self-perceived health changes predict longevity?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(11), pages 1981-1988, December.
    5. Liisa Karhe & Marja Kaunonen & Anna-Maija Koivisto, 2018. "Loneliness in Professional Caring Relationships, Health, and Recovery," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(2), pages 213-234, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:652-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.