IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v62y2006i1p199-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The palliative care in assisted living (PCAL) pilot study: Successes, shortfalls, and methodological implications

Author

Listed:
  • Jerant, Anthony F.
  • Azari, Rahman S.
  • Nesbitt, Thomas S.
  • Edwards-Goodbee, Adrienne
  • Meyers, Frederick J.

Abstract

Troubling deficits exist in palliative care (PC) of older adults under the prevailing "terminal care"-oriented model. We previously described a PC model--TLC--that provides a blueprint for remedying these shortfalls. In this model, PC is envisioned as Timely and Team-oriented, Longitudinal, and Collaborative and Comprehensive. We present results of the Palliative Care in Assisted Living pilot, comparing two TLC model-based, facility delivered interventions for improving the PC of elderly assisted living residents in Sacramento, California, a growing and under-researched population. The less intensive intervention involved one assessment followed by a PC improvement recommendation letter to the resident, family member, primary provider, and facility staff, while the more intensive intervention involved assessments and letters every three months. Primary outcomes were SF-36 Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component scores and recommendation adherence. Eighty-one subjects enrolled (mean age 85), 58 in the more and 23 in the less intensive group. A loved one attended 56% of baseline assessments. Most subjects expressed a preference for maintaining current quality of life over prolonging life at reduced quality. None were eligible for hospice care. A total of 418 recommendations (mean 5.1 per subject) were generated concerning symptoms, mood, functional impairments, and advance directives. We found no significant differences in recommendation adherence between more (42%) and less (44%) intensive groups, and no significant changes in PCS and MCS scores within or between groups. However, a loved one's attendance of the baseline assessment was associated with improved PCS scores (p=0.04). Our pilot study had methodological limitations that could account for the lack of significant outcome effects. In this context, and given the myriad unmet PC needs we detected, interventions based on the TLC model might allow delivery of timely PC to assisted living residents not eligible for hospice care. Further studies exploring the TLC model appear warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerant, Anthony F. & Azari, Rahman S. & Nesbitt, Thomas S. & Edwards-Goodbee, Adrienne & Meyers, Frederick J., 2006. "The palliative care in assisted living (PCAL) pilot study: Successes, shortfalls, and methodological implications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 199-207, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:1:p:199-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00241-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherbourne, Cathy Donald & Stewart, Anita L., 1991. "The MOS social support survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 705-714, January.
    2. Slomka, Jacquelyn, 1992. "The negotiation of death: Clinical decision making at the end of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 251-259, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise Catalano & Linda Holloway & Elias Mpofu, 2018. "Mental Health Interventions for Parent Carers of Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: Practice Guidelines from a Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Liping Ye & Xinping Zhang, 2021. "The association mechanism between social network types and health‐related behaviours among the elderly in rural Hubei Province, China," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 826-846, May.
    3. Patrick Nürnberger & Dirk von Lewinski & Hans-Bernd Rothenhäusler & Celine Braun & Patrick Reinbacher & Ewald Kolesnik & Andreas Baranyi, 2022. "A biopsychosocial model of severe fear of COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Kenneth G. Rice & Fernán Arana & Hannah Wetstone & Michelle Aiello & Barbara Durán, 2023. "Predicting and Moderating COVID-Fear and Stress among College Students in Argentina and the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Ellen G. Levine & Grace J. Yoo & Caryn Aviv, 2017. "Predictors of Quality of Life among Ethnically Diverse Breast Cancer Survivors," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Petro Mlyakado, Budeba & Li, Jessica Chi-Mei & Xinshan Jia, Cindy, 2023. "Online sexual exploitation of adolescents in Tanzania: Explaining help-seeking intention using the theory of planned behaviour," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Kathleen Finlayson & Helen Edwards & Mary Courtney, 2010. "The impact of psychosocial factors on adherence to compression therapy to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1289-1297, May.
    8. Lisa Hightow-Weidman & Sara LeGrand & Seul Ki Choi & Joseph Egger & Christopher B Hurt & Kathryn E Muessig, 2017. "Exploring the HIV continuum of care among young black MSM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Charlay Indoumou Peppe & Emin Altintas & Eleonore Ngoma Voumbi & Alain Guerrien, 2018. "Personality, Relationships with Others and Psychological Well-Being: A Pilot Study on the Gabonese Older People," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 1965-1979, October.
    10. Hongmei Tong & Yu Lung & Shen (Lamson) Lin & Karen M Kobayashi & Karen M Davison & Senyo Agbeyaka & Esme Fuller-Thomson, 2021. "Refugee status is associated with double the odds of psychological distress in mid-to-late life: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(6), pages 747-760, September.
    11. Miranda Rutenfrans-Stupar & Tine Regenmortel & René Schalk, 2019. "How to Enhance Social Participation and Well-Being in (Formerly) Homeless Clients: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 329-348, August.
    12. Sarah Abu-Kaf & Ora Nakash & Tsahi Hayat & Michal Cohen, 2022. "Social Support and Psychological Distress among the Bedouin Arab Elderly in Israel: The Moderating Role of Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, April.
    13. Sascha K. Garrey & Alice E. Welch & Melanie H. Jacobson & Robert M. Brackbill & Lisa M. Gargano, 2020. "The Intentional Self-Medication of 9/11-Related PTSD Symptoms with Alcohol: 15 Years after the Disaster," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Shawna Hopper & Nicole G. Hammond & Arne Stinchcombe, 2022. "Satisfaction with Life in Mid-Age and older Canadians in the CLSA: Examining Personality and Minority Stress," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(6), pages 3455-3473, December.
    15. Alison Karasz & Shabnam Anne & Jena Derakhshani Hamadani & Fahmida Tofail, 2021. "The ASHA (Hope) Project: Testing an Integrated Depression Treatment and Economic Strengthening Intervention in Rural Bangladesh: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, January.
    16. Márcio Oliveira & José Oliveira & Ana Pinto Borges & João M. Lopes, 2021. "Social networks in the non-profit sector: Social support practices," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 523-552, December.
    17. Manfred E Beutel & Elmar Brähler & Jörg Wiltink & Matthias Michal & Eva M Klein & Claus Jünger & Philipp S Wild & Thomas Münzel & Maria Blettner & Karl Lackner & Stefan Nickels & Ana N Tibubos, 2017. "Emotional and tangible social support in a German population-based sample: Development and validation of the Brief Social Support Scale (BS6)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, October.
    18. Schneiderman, Janet U. & Davis, Jordan P. & Negriff, Sonya, 2021. "Associations between psychosocial functioning and physical health in youth with maltreatment experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Hughes, Tonda & Szalacha, Laura A. & McNair, Ruth, 2010. "Substance abuse and mental health disparities: Comparisons across sexual identity groups in a national sample of young Australian women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 824-831, August.
    20. Mario Samper-Pardo & Sandra León-Herrera & Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez & Belén Benedé-Azagra & Rosa Magallón-Botaya & Isabel Gómez-Soria & Estela Calatayud & Alejandra Aguilar-Latorre & Fátima Méndez-Lópe, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Mobile Application as an Adjuvant Treatment for People Diagnosed with Long COVID-19: Protocol for a Co-Creation Study of a Health Asset and an Analysis of Its Effective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:62:y:2006:i:1:p:199-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.