IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i8p1701-1710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Listening to those on the frontline: Lessons for community-based tuberculosis programmes from a qualitative study in Swaziland

Author

Listed:
  • Escott, Sarah
  • Walley, John

Abstract

This study explored the experience of people involved in a new community-based tuberculosis (TB) programme in rural Swaziland. Patients have their treatment observed in the community after choosing a treatment supporter (either community health worker or family member) in dialogue with the TB nurse. Interviews were conducted with TB patients, treatment supporters, clinic nurses, nurses working in the hospital-based TB team and medical staff. The study generated two main themes: (1) issues relating to the TB programme and (2) wider societal issues. Both are important, however this paper reports only the issues directly related to the TB programme. The study found that community-based care is preferred to hospital care, which should be retained only for the very ill patients. The importance of selecting suitable patients and ensuring individualised and flexible arrangements was highlighted. Although treatment outcomes are known to have improved since introducing the new TB programme a number of issues require further attention. Communication between different levels of the health service needs to be improved and consultation communication skills, taught prior to introducing the programme, need to be refreshed. All relevant staff must be trained on the TB programme and patient education (on TB, HIV and treatment adherence) needs to be reinforced throughout TB treatment. Health education of the wider community is also needed. Ongoing support of treatment supporters must recognise that their role is not simply treatment observation. In this context, where the large majority of TB patients are HIV positive, better co-ordination with the HIV/AIDS services is required, including treatment of other HIV-related infections and home-based care for TB patients who deteriorate. Although the findings and recommendations of this study are context specific they are likely to be of relevance to other programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Escott, Sarah & Walley, John, 2005. "Listening to those on the frontline: Lessons for community-based tuberculosis programmes from a qualitative study in Swaziland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1701-1710, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:8:p:1701-1710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00157-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zakus, J. David L., 0. "Resource dependency and community participation in primary health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(4-5), pages 475-494, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiraporn Choowong & Duangjai Sawatdee & Penjan Maneechote & Phatcharapon Tulyakul, 2020. "The Development of Village Health Volunteers’ Competencies for Tuberculosis Care in Trang Province, Thailand," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Sara Balestri, 2020. "Inside the Policy Process: Using Textual Analysis to Measure People-Centered Approach in Tuberculosis Policy-Making," Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, Vita e Pensiero, Pubblicazioni dell'Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, vol. 128(2), pages 147-172.
    3. Lettieri, Emanuele & Bartoli, Laura & Masella, Cristina, 2013. "Coordinating intra-sector services in healthcare: Requirements and elements that managers should take into account," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 591-601.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Meads & Grant Russell & Amanda Lees, 2017. "Community governance in primary health care: towards an international Ideal Type," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 554-574, October.
    2. George, Asha & Scott, Kerry & Garimella, Surekha & Mondal, Shinjini & Ved, Rajani & Sheikh, Kabir, 2015. "Anchoring contextual analysis in health policy and systems research: A narrative review of contextual factors influencing health committees in low and middle income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 159-167.
    3. Rocco Palumbo & Mohammad Fakhar Manesh & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Giulia Flamini, 2020. "Exploiting Inter-Organizational Relationships in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Wells, Rebecca & Cilenti, Dorothy & Issel, L. Michele, 2015. "The political economy of a public health case management program's transition into medical homes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 98-106.
    5. Chung, Phillip & Grogan, Colleen M. & Mosley, Jennifer E., 2012. "Residents' perceptions of effective community representation in local health decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1652-1659.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:8:p:1701-1710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.