IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v55y2002i9p1571-1578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dutch GPs' perceptions: the influence of out-of-pocket costs on prescribing

Author

Listed:
  • Kasje, W. N.
  • Timmer, J. W.
  • Boendermaker, P. M.
  • Haaijer-Ruskamp, F. M.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the impact of out-of-pocket costs on Dutch general practitioners' prescribing. A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted. An open-ended topic guide was used to elucidate the influence of out-of-pocket costs on decision making for the treatment of dyspepsia, hay fever, hormone replacement therapy, and hypertension. A total of 21 Dutch GPs from University Departments of General Practice participated in four separate focus groups. These discussions were held between November 1998 and March 1999. Each discussion was tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. From this transcription, key factors and issues were identified. GPs reported that they do not generally take out-of-pocket costs into account. Fully reimbursed drugs were usually prescribed and GPs felt that most patients were highly motivated and thus willing to pay for their medication. The patient charges were seen to be low and not likely to affect patients' willingness to pay. GPs felt that patients need not have to pay for their medication. They adjusted their drug choice in order to avoid co-payment and were willing to agree to a patient's demand for a reimbursed prescription. GPs describe their prescribing as not influenced by out-of-pocket costs. GPs seem inclined to avoid co-payment for patients when patients have financial difficulties and the disease is perceived as severe. They chose fully reimbursed drugs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasje, W. N. & Timmer, J. W. & Boendermaker, P. M. & Haaijer-Ruskamp, F. M., 2002. "Dutch GPs' perceptions: the influence of out-of-pocket costs on prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 1571-1578, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:9:p:1571-1578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00291-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alice sanwald & Engelbert Theurl, 2014. "What drives out-of pocket health expenditures of private households? - Empirical evidence from the Austrian household budget survey," Working Papers 2014-04, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    2. Fraeyman, Jessica & Symons, Linda & De Loof, Hans & De Meyer, Guido R.Y. & Remmen, Roy & Beutels, Philippe & Van Hal, Guido, 2015. "Medicine price awareness in chronic patients in Belgium," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 217-223.
    3. O’Brien, Gary L. & Sinnott, Sarah-Jo & O’ Flynn, Bridget & Walshe, Valerie & Mulcahy, Mark & Byrne, Stephen, 2020. "Out of pocket or out of control: A qualitative analysis of healthcare professional stakeholder involvement in pharmaceutical policy change in Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 411-418.
    4. Paraponaris, A. & Verger, P. & Desquins, B. & Villani, P. & Bouvenot, G. & Rochaix, L. & Gourheux, J. C. & Moatti, J. P. AU -, 2004. "Delivering generics without regulatory incentives?: Empirical evidence from French general practitioners about willingness to prescribe international non-proprietary names," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 23-32, October.
    5. Carlsen, Benedicte & Hole, Arne Risa & Kolstad, Julie Riise & Norheim, Ole Frithjof, 2012. "When you can’t have the cake and eat it too," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(11), pages 1964-1973.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:9:p:1571-1578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.