IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v54y2002i11p1725-1737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rhetoric of sector-wide approaches for health development

Author

Listed:
  • Hill, Peter S.

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed an increasing concerns over the effectiveness of project-based development assistance and the promotion of sector-wide approaches (SWAps) to health as a means to increase donor collaboration, consolidate local management of resources and undertake the policy and systems reform necessary to achieve a greater impact on health issues. The concept has gained the support of both the World Bank and the World Health Organisation, as well as key bilateral donors, and dominates current initiatives in development assistance for health. This paper examines the proposal of SWAps as rhetoric, and seeks to understand how that rhetoric functions, despite the variable application of its constituent elements and the range of contexts in which it operates.

Suggested Citation

  • Hill, Peter S., 2002. "The rhetoric of sector-wide approaches for health development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1725-1737, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:11:p:1725-1737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00340-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rohan Sweeney & Duncan Mortimer, 2016. "Has the Swap Influenced Aid Flows in the Health Sector?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(5), pages 559-577, May.
    2. Vaughn F. Graham, 2017. "Toward a Conceptual Expansion of Ownership and Post‐2015 Global Development Policy: Illustrations from the Jamaican Experience," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(3), pages 373-395, May.
    3. Thurston, Wilfreda E. & MacKean, Gail & Vollman, Ardene & Casebeer, Ann & Weber, Myron & Maloff, Bretta & Bader, Judy, 2005. "Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 237-252, September.
    4. Sundewall, Jesper & Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin, 2006. "Translations of health sector SWAps--A comparative study of health sector development cooperation in Uganda, Zambia and Bangladesh," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 277-287, May.
    5. Okiwelu, Tamunosa & Hussein, Julia & Adjei, Sam & Arhinful, Daniel & Armar-Klemesu, Margaret, 2007. "Safe motherhood in Ghana: Still on the agenda?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(2-3), pages 359-367, December.
    6. Rahman, Md Saifur & Giessen, Lukas, 2017. "Formal and Informal Interests of Donors to Allocate Aid: Spending Patterns of USAID, GIZ, and EU Forest Development Policy in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 250-267.
    7. Maame Esi Woode & Duncan Mortimer & Rohan Sweeney, 2021. "The impact of health sector‐wide approaches on aid effectiveness and infant mortality," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 826-844, July.
    8. Fisher, Colleen & Hunt, Lynne & Adamsam, Rhonda & Thurston, Wilfreda E., 2007. "'Health's a difficult beast': The interrelationships between domestic violence, women's health and the health sector: An Australian case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1742-1750, October.
    9. Sweeney, Rohan & Mortimer, Duncan & Johnston, David W., 2014. "Do Sector Wide Approaches for health aid delivery lead to ‘donor-flight’? A comparison of 46 low-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 38-46.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:11:p:1725-1737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.