IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v379y2025ics0277953625004769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making and disposing of life's ‘starting materials’: A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffries Hein, Robbin
  • Le Goff, Anne
  • Landecker, Hannah L.

Abstract

This paper explores stakeholder attitudes toward gametes and embryos in the context of in vitro gametogenesis (IVG), a new stem cell technology whose future clinical application would entail the production of eggs and sperm in vitro. A key concern raised by the prospect of making gametes from originally non-reproductive body cells has been its potential exacerbation of the issue of “surplus” cryopreserved embryos through the production of unprecedented numbers, with an allied devaluation of human reproductive materials. However, this concern has not been empirically investigated. In this study, focus groups composed of individuals representative of the constituency most likely to be impacted by IVG were asked to respond to scenarios in which the relative abundance and scarcity of gametes and embryos were changed by these new procedures. Respondents who had experienced involuntary childlessness and/or previously accessed in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology drew on these experiences to reason their way through future scenarios in which cells could be more fluidly exchanged over the somatic-reproductive boundary. Unfettered abundance was not found to be a key issue for these respondents. Rather, concerns focused on questions of technological control over outcomes in ARTs, cultural scripts about the preciousness of eggs moderated by concordance between the gender or the donor and the sex of the gamete, and in vitro gametes and embryos as embodiments of the often painful and costly process of attaining them.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffries Hein, Robbin & Le Goff, Anne & Landecker, Hannah L., 2025. "Making and disposing of life's ‘starting materials’: A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:379:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004769
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004769
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friese, Carrie & Becker, Gay & Nachtigall, Robert D., 2006. "Rethinking the biological clock: Eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms and meanings of age-related infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1550-1560, September.
    2. Orie Hikabe & Nobuhiko Hamazaki & Go Nagamatsu & Yayoi Obata & Yuji Hirao & Norio Hamada & So Shimamoto & Takuya Imamura & Kinichi Nakashima & Mitinori Saitou & Katsuhiko Hayashi, 2016. "Reconstitution in vitro of the entire cycle of the mouse female germ line," Nature, Nature, vol. 539(7628), pages 299-303, November.
    3. Parry, Sarah, 2006. "(Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: Exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2349-2359, May.
    4. Kenta Murakami & Nobuhiko Hamazaki & Norio Hamada & Go Nagamatsu & Ikuhiro Okamoto & Hiroshi Ohta & Yoshiaki Nosaka & Yukiko Ishikura & Tomoya S. Kitajima & Yuichiro Semba & Yuya Kunisaki & Fumio Arai, 2023. "Generation of functional oocytes from male mice in vitro," Nature, Nature, vol. 615(7954), pages 900-906, March.
    5. Delaunay, Catarina & Gouveia, Luís & Santos, Mário JDS. & Morais, Rita, 2023. "(De)Bonding with embryos: The emotional choreographies of Portuguese IVF patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    6. Pfeffer, Naomi, 2008. "What British women say matters to them about donating an aborted fetus to stem cell research: A focus group study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2544-2554, June.
    7. Almeling, Rene & Willey, Iris L., 2017. "Same medicine, different reasons: Comparing women's bodily experiences of producing eggs for pregnancy or for profit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 21-29.
    8. Raz, Aviad & Vardi, Jasmine & Reisner Vain, Shelly & Meiri, Amir & Barkan, Gali & Azem, Foad & Amir, Hadar, 2021. "Unmet communication needs and moral work in the disposition decision concerning surplus frozen embryos: The perspectives of IVF users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kent, Julie, 2008. "The fetal tissue economy: From the abortion clinic to the stem cell laboratory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1747-1756, December.
    2. Delaunay, Catarina & Gouveia, Luís & Santos, Mário JDS. & Morais, Rita, 2023. "(De)Bonding with embryos: The emotional choreographies of Portuguese IVF patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    3. Mukherjee, Meghna, 2020. "The Management of Unequal Patient Status in Fertility Medicine: Donors' and Intended Parents’ Experiences of Participatory and Imposed Enrollment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Saniei, Mansooreh, 2013. "Human embryonic stem cell science and policy: The case of Iran," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 345-350.
    5. Campbell, Patricia, 2011. "Boundaries and risk: Media framing of assisted reproductive technologies and older mothers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 265-272, January.
    6. Sassano, Angie & Mayes, Christopher, 2024. "‘Like going to get a facial’: Heterotopic spaces and gendered aesthetics of commercial Australian reproductive clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    7. Yusheng Liu & Wenrong Tao & Shuang Wu & Yiwei Zhang & Hu Nie & Zhenzhen Hou & Jingye Zhang & Zhen Yang & Zi-Jiang Chen & Jiaqiang Wang & Falong Lu & Keliang Wu, 2024. "Maternal mRNA deadenylation is defective in in vitro matured mouse and human oocytes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Pfeffer, Naomi, 2008. "What British women say matters to them about donating an aborted fetus to stem cell research: A focus group study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2544-2554, June.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0159113 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Krystal Wilkinson & Jennifer Tomlinson & Jean Gardiner, 2017. "Exploring the work–life challenges and dilemmas faced by managers and professionals who live alone," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 640-656, August.
    11. Waldby, Catherine & Kerridge, Ian & Boulos, Margaret & Carroll, Katherine, 2013. "From altruism to monetisation: Australian women's ideas about money, ethics and research eggs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 34-42.
    12. Degli Esposti, Sara & Pavone, Vincenzo, 2019. "Oocyte provision as a (quasi) social market: Insights from Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Roberts, Celia & Throsby, Karen, 2008. "Paid to share: IVF patients, eggs and stem cell research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 159-169, January.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0203197 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Desy, Alexandra & Marre, Diana, 2024. "The reproductive journeys of French women over 40 seeking assisted reproductive technology treatments in Spain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    16. Ehrich, Kathryn & Williams, Clare & Farsides, Bobbie, 2010. "Fresh or frozen? Classifying 'spare' embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(12), pages 2204-2211, December.
    17. Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Desperately seeking parenthood: neonatal nurses reflect on parental anguish," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1885-1894, July.
    18. Ho, Shirley S. & Looi, Jiemin & Chuah, Agnes S.F. & Leong, Alisius D. & Pang, Natalie, 2018. "“I can live with nuclear energy if…”: Exploring public perceptions of nuclear energy in Singapore," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 436-447.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:379:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.