IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v369y2025ics0277953625001261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living with the rare late-onset genetic disease CADASIL: Improvising “tactics” to appropriate biomedical knowledge and technology

Author

Listed:
  • Akrich, Madeleine
  • Paterson, Florence
  • Rabeharisoa, Vololona

Abstract

This study focuses on cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), a rare late-onset neurodegenerative disease of genetic origin. For CADASIL—and for other late-onset genetic conditions—genetic testing can predict whether an individual will develop the disease, even in the absence of symptoms. Multiple bodies of research in the social studies of medicine and in science and technology examine how individuals with genetic risks and diseases live through the in-between situation of being simultaneously healthy and on the cusp of ill-health. Drawing on data from interviews with 30 individuals concerned with CADASIL, we show that they do not allow themselves to be reduced to their genetic status. On the contrary, they appropriate the possibilities offered by biomedical knowledge and technology (genetic testing and reproductive technologies) to, as much as possible, control the way the disease manifests in their lives. We explore three pivotal moments or situations in the lives of these individuals: facing the possibility of genetic testing, dealing with the disease and its surveillance after the diagnosis, and becoming a parent with or without the assistance of reproductive technologies. In contrast to criticisms of geneticization, we examine how, at each of these stages, these individuals develop “tactics”—in the sense employed by de Certeau (1990)—with respect to genetics to keep the disease at arm's length and live as good a life as possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Akrich, Madeleine & Paterson, Florence & Rabeharisoa, Vololona, 2025. "Living with the rare late-onset genetic disease CADASIL: Improvising “tactics” to appropriate biomedical knowledge and technology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:369:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dumit, Joseph, 2006. "Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 577-590, February.
    2. Dimond, Rebecca & Doheny, Shane & Ballard, Lisa & Clarke, Angus, 2022. "Genetic testing and family entanglements," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Evers-Kiebooms, G. & Welkenhuysen, M. & Claes, E. & Decruyenaere, M. & Denayer, L., 2000. "The psychological complexity of predictive testing for late onset neurogenetic diseases and hereditary cancers: implications for multidisciplinary counselling and for genetic education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 831-841, September.
    4. Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, 2016. "After geneticization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 132-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Best, Rachel Kahn & Fang, Yan & Fisk, Catherine & Krieger, Linda Hamilton & Reddy, Diana, 2025. "Disputed and disfavored: Pain, mental illness, and invisible conditions in disability discrimination cases," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    2. Locock, Louise & Nettleton, Sarah & Kirkpatrick, Susan & Ryan, Sara & Ziebland, Sue, 2016. "‘I knew before I was told’: Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 85-92.
    3. Trundle, Catherine, 2011. "Biopolitical endpoints: Diagnosing a deserving British nuclear test veteran," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 882-888, September.
    4. Phillips, Tarryn, 2012. "Repressive authenticity in the quest for legitimacy: Surveillance and the contested illness lawsuit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1762-1768.
    5. Schaepe, Karen Sue, 2011. "Bad news and first impressions: Patient and family caregiver accounts of learning the cancer diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 912-921, September.
    6. Brian Walitt & Richard L Nahin & Robert S Katz & Martin J Bergman & Frederick Wolfe, 2015. "The Prevalence and Characteristics of Fibromyalgia in the 2012 National Health Interview Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Park, Joohyun, 2025. "The cost of being a legal patient: Judicial use of rape defendants' and victims’ psychiatric records in South Korea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
    8. Kuchinskaya, Olga & Parker, Lisa S., 2018. "‘Recurrent losers unite’: Online forums, evidence-based activism, and pregnancy loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 74-80.
    9. Jutel, Annemarie, 2010. "Framing disease: The example of female hypoactive sexual desire disorder," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1084-1090, April.
    10. Rotolo, Thomas & Lengefeld, Michael, 2020. "Clearing the cobwebs: An analysis of the timing of youth concussion legislation in U.S. states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Bojovic, Neva & Geiger, Susi, 2023. "Epistemic and institutional recognition work in changing conditions of social visibility: Anosmia's journey from the shadows to the spotlight," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    12. Roth, Phillip H. & Gadebusch-Bondio, Mariacarla, 2022. "The contested meaning of “long COVID” – Patients, doctors, and the politics of subjective evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    13. Russell, Ginny & Kelly, Susan E. & Ford, Tamsin & Steer, Colin, 2012. "Diagnosis as a social determinant: The development of prosocial behaviour before and after an autism spectrum diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(9), pages 1642-1649.
    14. Kaplan, Kenton & Mendenhall, Emily, 2024. "Framing Long Covid through Patient activism in the United States: Patient, Provider, Academic, and Policymaker Views," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    15. Foster, Drew, 2016. "‘Keep complaining til someone listens’: Exchanges of tacit healthcare knowledge in online illness communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 25-32.
    16. ten Kate, Josje & de Koster, Willem & van der Waal, Jeroen, 2022. "Becoming skeptical towards vaccines: How health views shape the trajectories following health-related events," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    17. Jutel, Annemarie & Banister, Elizabeth, 2013. "“I was pretty sure I had the 'flu”: Qualitative description of confirmed-influenza symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 49-55.
    18. Mezza, Maurizia & Blume, Stuart, 2021. "Turning suffering into side effects: Responses to HPV vaccination in Colombia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    19. Ross Arguedas, Amy A., 2020. "“Can naughty be healthy?”: Healthism and its discontents in news coverage of orthorexia nervosa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Shim, Jae-Mahn & Kim, Jibum, 2020. "Contextualizing geneticization and medical pluralism: How variable institutionalization of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) conditions effects of genetic beliefs on utilizat," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:369:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.