“Can naughty be healthy?”: Healthism and its discontents in news coverage of orthorexia nervosa

Orthorexia nervosa was first proposed as a diagnosis in 1997, referring to a pathological obsession with healthy food. While not formally accepted by the medical establishment, since its inception, it drew the attention of news outlets around the world. This paper examines almost two decades of news coverage about orthorexia to understand how writers have made sense of the proposed diagnosis. Based on an inductive thematic analysis of 492 articles, I find news stories have overwhelmingly framed orthorexia as a medical problem but relied on narratives that mix moral and medical beliefs to explain what is problematic about it, depicting it as absurd, obnoxious, paradoxical, and dangerous. I also examine how shifting explanations of orthorexia's causes differentially allocate responsibility, presenting it as a matter of personal choice when associating it with diets, while presenting orthorexics as victims in technology-focused explanations. I compare orthorexia coverage with discourses about obesity and eating disorders to show how the label simultaneously draws from and contests preceding health discourse. While narratives about orthorexia demonstrate the pervasiveness of medicalization, I suggest they can also be read as a backlash against healthism, relying on metaphors of mental health, illness, and risk to speak to healthism in its own language.