IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v33y1991i5p569-577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literature

Author

Listed:
  • Gotay, Carolyn Cook

Abstract

Although randomized clinical trials are the predominant method used to evaluate cancer therapies, only a small proportion of potential participants actually enter onto trials. This paper analyzes the research literature on accrual to cancer therapy trials. The research shows that nonparticipation is influenced by physician and patient variables, as well as by characteristics of the specific protocols. Trials design, especially pre-existing treatment preferences, pose significant problems for physicians and patients. Intervention strategies have focused on alternate trial designs, improving the informed consent process, and increasing knowledge about trials. Additional research should focus on the perspectives of patients who accept and decline trial participation and on interventions designed to affect accrual. Future studies need to be sensitive to patient quality of life considerations as well as practical and ethical issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Gotay, Carolyn Cook, 1991. "Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 569-577, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:5:p:569-577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90214-W
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verheggen, Frank W. S. M. & van Wijmen, Frans C. B., 1996. "Informed consent in clinical trials," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 131-153, May.
    2. Heather J. Sutherland & Raquel da Cunha & Gina A. Lockwood & James E. Till, 1998. "What Attitudes and Beliefs Underlie Patients' Decisions about Participating in Chemotherapy Trials?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(1), pages 61-69, January.
    3. Clairice T. Veit, 2004. "A Single Mathematical Model Predicts Physicians’ Recommendations and Postmenopausal Women’s Decisions to Participate in a Clinical Trial to Prevent Breast Cancer or Coronary Heart Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 24(4), pages 330-350, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:33:y:1991:i:5:p:569-577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.