IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v329y2023ics0277953623004045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intersex people's perspectives on affirming healthcare practices: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Haghighat, Darius
  • Berro, Tala
  • Torrey Sosa, Lillian
  • Horowitz, Kayla
  • Brown-King, Bria
  • Zayhowski, Kimberly

Abstract

Intersex people have variations in their sex characteristics that do not exclusively fall within binary definitions of male and female. This community experiences discrimination in the medical setting due to the pathologization of intersex bodies, including ‘normalizing’ genital surgeries without the child's consent. While research has explored biomedical aspects contributing to intersex variations, there is limited research centering intersex people's perspectives on their healthcare experiences. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand the experiences of intersex people in the medical setting, with the goal of providing recommendations to clinicians to promote affirming healthcare practices. Between November 2021 and March 2022 we conducted 15 virtual semi-structured interviews with members of the intersex community about their experiences with healthcare providers and perspectives on how their care could be improved. Participants were recruited through social media, with the majority residing in the United States. Through reflexive thematic analysis, 4 major themes were conceptualized: (1) the exclusion of intersex people in binary frameworks, (2) the common experience of medical trauma, (3) the value of psychosocial support, and (4) systemic change to address intersex healthcare. Recommendations were generated based on participants' narratives, including a recommendation for providers to use a trauma-informed approach to care. Healthcare providers must prioritize patient autonomy and ensure consent throughout their medical visits in order to promote intersex affirming care. Depathologization of intersex variations and comprehensive teachings of intersex history and medical care must be incorporated into medical curricula to mitigate experiences of medical trauma and to relieve the burden placed on patients to be their own medical experts and advocates. Participants shared the value of being connected to support groups and mental health resources. Systemic change is needed for the normalization and demedicalization of intersex variations and for the medical empowerment of the intersex community.

Suggested Citation

  • Haghighat, Darius & Berro, Tala & Torrey Sosa, Lillian & Horowitz, Kayla & Brown-King, Bria & Zayhowski, Kimberly, 2023. "Intersex people's perspectives on affirming healthcare practices: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:329:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623004045
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623004045
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenkins, Tania M. & Short, Susan E., 2017. "Negotiating intersex: A case for revising the theory of social diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 91-98.
    2. Budych, Karolina & Helms, Thomas M. & Schultz, Carsten, 2012. "How do patients with rare diseases experience the medical encounter? Exploring role behavior and its impact on patient–physician interaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 154-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goeldner, Moritz & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2016. "Are patients and relatives the better innovators? The case of medical smartphone applications," Working Papers 91, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    2. Nicole Boffin & Elfriede Swinnen & Johan Wens & Montse Urbina & Johan Van der Heyden & Viviane Van Casteren, 2018. "General Practice Care for Patients with Rare Diseases in Belgium. A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Javier Güeita-Rodriguez & Pilar Famoso-Pérez & Jaime Salom-Moreno & Pilar Carrasco-Garrido & Jorge Pérez-Corrales & Domingo Palacios-Ceña, 2020. "Challenges Affecting Access to Health and Social Care Resources and Time Management among Parents of Children with Rett Syndrome: A Qualitative Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Eva Kesternich & Olaf Rank, 2022. "Beyond patient-sharing: Comparing physician- and patient-induced networks," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 498-514, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:329:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623004045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.