IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v327y2023ics0277953623003015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using laws, common sense, and statistical approaches to design indicators for ‘medical desertification’. An application on the Romanian case

Author

Listed:
  • Voicu, Bogdan
  • Fărcășanu, Dana
  • Mustață, Mirela
  • Deliu, Alexandra
  • Vișinescu, Iulia

Abstract

The study of spatial accessibility to healthcare services is key to health policy (Pförtner et al., 2019; Vergier et al., 2017). Terms such as ‘rurality’ or ‘medical desertification’ were employed to stress the relevance of the topic. Within the existing literature, there is little (if any) concern with the legitimacy of the existing ways to measure inequality. Expert systems were assumed to be in place, and discrepancies or consistency with existing regulations or to views of relevant stakeholders were not considered. This paper discusses spatial accessibility of medical services in three distinct approaches: normative, that is following what national regulations consider as standard; relative, that is what statistical approaches reveal; consensual, which adjusts the indexes based on representations of stakeholders. The three approaches are compared for the case of Romania, an EU country with low population density, ideal to inspect geographical discrepancies. For the relative and the consensual approach, population is adjusted according to different demand expressed by age groups, and also including population and providers from the nearby localities. The normative approach follows official regulations. The refinements in the consensual model are based on survey data from stakeholders and consider distances to neighbouring localities and adjustments according to the age structure of the population in the catchment area. The results reveal high consistency between the consensual and the relative approach. Both are more permissive with respect to detecting medical desertification as compared to the normative approach but prove to be more effective in directing policy when resources are scarce. The normative approach, however, is relevant in depicting the state of the system as contrasted to a desired standard. The relative approach also overlaps with the consensual one. Therefore, to fully characterize spatial accessibility to general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacies, one needs to consider at least the normative and the relative approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Voicu, Bogdan & Fărcășanu, Dana & Mustață, Mirela & Deliu, Alexandra & Vișinescu, Iulia, 2023. "Using laws, common sense, and statistical approaches to design indicators for ‘medical desertification’. An application on the Romanian case," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:327:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623003015
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623003015
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haynes, Robin & Bentham, Graham & Lovett, Andrew & Gale, Susan, 1999. "Effects of distances to hospital and GP surgery on hospital inpatient episodes, controlling for needs and provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 425-433, August.
    2. Bagnis, Arianna & Caffo, Ernesto & Cipolli, Carlo & De Palma, Alessandra & Farina, Gabriele & Mattarozzi, Katia, 2020. "Judging health care priority in emergency situations: Patient facial appearance matters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Wang, Xiuli & Yang, Huazhen & Duan, Zhanqi & Pan, Jay, 2018. "Spatial accessibility of primary health care in China: A case study in Sichuan Province," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 14-24.
    4. Morel, Sylvie, 2019. "Inequality and discrimination in access to urgent care in France Ethnographies of three healthcare structures and their audiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 25-32.
    5. Vallée, Julie & Shareck, Martine & Le Roux, Guillaume & Kestens, Yan & Frohlich, Katherine L., 2020. "Is accessibility in the eye of the beholder? Social inequalities in spatial accessibility to health-related resources in Montréal, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Shelley White-Means & Jill Dapremont & Barbara D Davis & Tronlyn Thompson, 2020. "Who Can Help Us on This Journey? African American Woman with Breast Cancer: Living in a City with Extreme Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Sabina Stan & Roland Erne, 2021. "Time for a paradigm change? Incorporating transnational processes into the analysis of the emerging European health-care system," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(3), pages 289-302, August.
    8. Watt, Ian S. & Sheldon, Trevor A., 1993. "Rurality and resource allocation in the UK," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 19-27, November.
    9. Rechel, Bernd & Džakula, Aleksandar & Duran, Antonio & Fattore, Giovanni & Edwards, Nigel & Grignon, Michel & Haas, Marion & Habicht, Triin & Marchildon, Gregory P. & Moreno, Antonio & Ricciardi, Walt, 2016. "Hospitals in rural or remote areas: An exploratory review of policies in 8 high-income countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(7), pages 758-769.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masood Gheasi & Noriko Ishikawa & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2019. "A meta-analysis of human health differences in urban and rural environments," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 167-186, December.
    2. Andrea Tortelli & Florence Perquier & Maria Melchior & François Lair & Fabien Encatassamy & Chloé Masson & Hélène K’ourio & Raphaël Gourevitch & Alain Mercuel, 2020. "Mental Health and Service Use of Migrants in Contact with the Public Psychiatry System in Paris," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Mohan, Gretta & Nolan, Anne & Lyons, Seán, 2019. "An investigation of the effect of accessibility to General Practitioner services on healthcare utilisation among older people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 254-263.
    4. Henry J. Mayer & Michael R. Greenberg, 2005. "Using Integrated Geospatial Mapping and Conceptual Site Models to Guide Risk‐Based Environmental Clean‐Up Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 429-446, April.
    5. Agnieszka Bem & Rafał Siedlecki & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Patrizia Gazzola & Bożena Ryszawska & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż, 2019. "Hospitals’ Financial Health in Rural and Urban Areas in Poland: Does It Ensure Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Glenn, N.M. & Frohlich, K.L. & Vallée, J., 2020. "Socio-spatial inequalities in smoking among young adults: What a ‘go-along’ study says about local smoking practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    7. Jia, Peng & Wang, Youfa & Yang, Min & Wang, Limin & Yang, Xuchao & Shi, Xinyu & Yang, Lijian & Wen, Jin & Liu, Yi & Yang, Maokang & Xin, Junguo & Zhang, Fengying & Jiang, Lihua & Chi, Chunhua & Zhang,, 2022. "Inequalities of spatial primary healthcare accessibility in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    8. Polin, Katherine & Hjortland, Maximilien & Maresso, Anna & van Ginneken, Ewout & Busse, Reinhard & Quentin, Wilm, 2021. "“Top-Three” health reforms in 31 high-income countries in 2018 and 2019: an expert informed overview," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(7), pages 815-832.
    9. Liu, Yun & Kong, Qingxia & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2019. "Public preferences for health care facilities in rural China: A discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Leticia Sanchez & Nelida Fernandez & Angela P. Calle & Valentina Ladera & Ines Casado & Enrique Bayon & Isaias Garcia & Ana M. Sahagun, 2022. "Assessing the Expression of Emotions in Breast Cancer Survivors during the Time of Recovery: Perspective from Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Kelobonye, Keone & Zhou, Heng & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia), 2020. "Measuring the accessibility and spatial equity of urban services under competition using the cumulative opportunities measure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Lin, Xiaojun & Lu, Liyong & Pan, Jay, 2021. "Hospital market competition and health technology diffusion: An empirical study of laparoscopic appendectomy in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    13. Ricardo Ocaña-Riola & Carmen Sánchez-Cantalejo, 2005. "Rurality Index for Small Areas in Spain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 247-266, September.
    14. Rottemberg, Julieta & Ghasri, Milad & Grzybowska, Hanna & Dockery, Alfred M. & Waller, S. Travis, 2022. "Inequality and access to services for remote populations: An Australian case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Julaine Allan & Anna Thompson, 2023. "Experiences of Young People and Their Carers with a Rural Mobile Mental Health Support Service: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Hernandez, Diego & Rossel, Cecilia, 2015. "Inequality and access to social services in Latin America: space–time constraints of child health checkups and prenatal care in Montevideo," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 24-32.
    17. Fangye Du & Jiaoe Wang & Haitao Jin, 2021. "Whether Public Hospital Reform Affects the Hospital Choices of Patients in Urban Areas: New Evidence from Smart Card Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Zhicheng Zheng & Haoming Xia & Shrinidhi Ambinakudige & Yaochen Qin & Yang Li & Zhixiang Xie & Lijun Zhang & Haibin Gu, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Hospitals Based on Web Mapping API: An Empirical Study in Kaifeng, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Yang, Nan & Shen, Liyin & Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Shiju & Peng, Yi & Wang, Jinhuan, 2021. "An integrative method for analyzing spatial accessibility in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    20. Dubas-Jakóbczyk, K. & Albreht, T. & Behmane, D. & Bryndova, L. & Dimova, A. & Džakula, A. & Habicht, T. & Murauskiene, L. & Scîntee, S.G. & Smatana, M. & Velkey, Z. & Quentin, W., 2020. "Hospital reforms in 11 Central and Eastern European countries between 2008 and 2019: a comparative analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 368-379.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:327:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623003015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.