IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v327y2023ics0277953623003015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using laws, common sense, and statistical approaches to design indicators for ‘medical desertification’. An application on the Romanian case

Author

Listed:
  • Voicu, Bogdan
  • Fărcășanu, Dana
  • Mustață, Mirela
  • Deliu, Alexandra
  • Vișinescu, Iulia

Abstract

The study of spatial accessibility to healthcare services is key to health policy (Pförtner et al., 2019; Vergier et al., 2017). Terms such as ‘rurality’ or ‘medical desertification’ were employed to stress the relevance of the topic. Within the existing literature, there is little (if any) concern with the legitimacy of the existing ways to measure inequality. Expert systems were assumed to be in place, and discrepancies or consistency with existing regulations or to views of relevant stakeholders were not considered. This paper discusses spatial accessibility of medical services in three distinct approaches: normative, that is following what national regulations consider as standard; relative, that is what statistical approaches reveal; consensual, which adjusts the indexes based on representations of stakeholders. The three approaches are compared for the case of Romania, an EU country with low population density, ideal to inspect geographical discrepancies. For the relative and the consensual approach, population is adjusted according to different demand expressed by age groups, and also including population and providers from the nearby localities. The normative approach follows official regulations. The refinements in the consensual model are based on survey data from stakeholders and consider distances to neighbouring localities and adjustments according to the age structure of the population in the catchment area. The results reveal high consistency between the consensual and the relative approach. Both are more permissive with respect to detecting medical desertification as compared to the normative approach but prove to be more effective in directing policy when resources are scarce. The normative approach, however, is relevant in depicting the state of the system as contrasted to a desired standard. The relative approach also overlaps with the consensual one. Therefore, to fully characterize spatial accessibility to general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacies, one needs to consider at least the normative and the relative approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Voicu, Bogdan & Fărcășanu, Dana & Mustață, Mirela & Deliu, Alexandra & Vișinescu, Iulia, 2023. "Using laws, common sense, and statistical approaches to design indicators for ‘medical desertification’. An application on the Romanian case," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:327:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623003015
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623003015
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haynes, Robin & Bentham, Graham & Lovett, Andrew & Gale, Susan, 1999. "Effects of distances to hospital and GP surgery on hospital inpatient episodes, controlling for needs and provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 425-433, August.
    2. Bagnis, Arianna & Caffo, Ernesto & Cipolli, Carlo & De Palma, Alessandra & Farina, Gabriele & Mattarozzi, Katia, 2020. "Judging health care priority in emergency situations: Patient facial appearance matters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Wang, Xiuli & Yang, Huazhen & Duan, Zhanqi & Pan, Jay, 2018. "Spatial accessibility of primary health care in China: A case study in Sichuan Province," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 14-24.
    4. Morel, Sylvie, 2019. "Inequality and discrimination in access to urgent care in France Ethnographies of three healthcare structures and their audiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 25-32.
    5. Vallée, Julie & Shareck, Martine & Le Roux, Guillaume & Kestens, Yan & Frohlich, Katherine L., 2020. "Is accessibility in the eye of the beholder? Social inequalities in spatial accessibility to health-related resources in Montréal, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Shelley White-Means & Jill Dapremont & Barbara D Davis & Tronlyn Thompson, 2020. "Who Can Help Us on This Journey? African American Woman with Breast Cancer: Living in a City with Extreme Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Sabina Stan & Roland Erne, 2021. "Time for a paradigm change? Incorporating transnational processes into the analysis of the emerging European health-care system," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(3), pages 289-302, August.
    8. Watt, Ian S. & Sheldon, Trevor A., 1993. "Rurality and resource allocation in the UK," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 19-27, November.
    9. Rechel, Bernd & Džakula, Aleksandar & Duran, Antonio & Fattore, Giovanni & Edwards, Nigel & Grignon, Michel & Haas, Marion & Habicht, Triin & Marchildon, Gregory P. & Moreno, Antonio & Ricciardi, Walt, 2016. "Hospitals in rural or remote areas: An exploratory review of policies in 8 high-income countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(7), pages 758-769.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Petrovici, Norbert & Belbe, Stefana (Ștefana) & Mare, Codruta (Codruța) & Cotoi, Calin (Călin), 2023. "Hybrid health regimes: Access to primary care physicians and COVID-19 vaccine uptake across municipalities in Romania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gelly, Maud, 2025. "Sorting patients and institutional bad faith: A study of a hospital during the COVID-19 epidemic in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    2. Fangye Du & Jiaoe Wang & Haitao Jin, 2021. "Whether Public Hospital Reform Affects the Hospital Choices of Patients in Urban Areas: New Evidence from Smart Card Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Masood Gheasi & Noriko Ishikawa & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2019. "A meta-analysis of human health differences in urban and rural environments," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 167-186, December.
    4. Hamed, Sarah & Bradby, Hannah & Thapar-Björkert, Suruchi & Ahlberg, Beth Maina, 2024. "Healthcare staff's racialized talk: The perpetuation of racism in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    5. Zhicheng Zheng & Haoming Xia & Shrinidhi Ambinakudige & Yaochen Qin & Yang Li & Zhixiang Xie & Lijun Zhang & Haibin Gu, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Hospitals Based on Web Mapping API: An Empirical Study in Kaifeng, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:s78xa_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Yang, Nan & Shen, Liyin & Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Shiju & Peng, Yi & Wang, Jinhuan, 2021. "An integrative method for analyzing spatial accessibility in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Andrea Tortelli & Florence Perquier & Maria Melchior & François Lair & Fabien Encatassamy & Chloé Masson & Hélène K’ourio & Raphaël Gourevitch & Alain Mercuel, 2020. "Mental Health and Service Use of Migrants in Contact with the Public Psychiatry System in Paris," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Dubas-Jakóbczyk, K. & Albreht, T. & Behmane, D. & Bryndova, L. & Dimova, A. & Džakula, A. & Habicht, T. & Murauskiene, L. & Scîntee, S.G. & Smatana, M. & Velkey, Z. & Quentin, W., 2020. "Hospital reforms in 11 Central and Eastern European countries between 2008 and 2019: a comparative analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 368-379.
    10. Yang Yu & Yijin Wu & Xin Xu & Yun Chen & Xiaobo Tian & Li Wang & Siyun Chen, 2021. "Spatial Disparities and Correlated Variables of Community Care Facility Accessibility in Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Xiuli Wang & Barnabas C. Seyler & Ting Chen & Weiyan Jian & Hongqiao Fu & Baofeng Di & Winnie Yip & Jay Pan, 2024. "Disparity in healthcare seeking behaviors between impoverished and non-impoverished populations with implications for healthcare resource optimization," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Lubi, Kadi & Uibu, Marko & Koppel, Katre & Mets-Oja, Silja, 2020. "The rising impact of civic activism on health policy: The analysis of the closure of smaller obstetric units in Estonia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1239-1244.
    13. Kurt Vandaele, 2021. "Applauded ‘nightingales’ voicing discontent. Exploring labour unrest in health and social care in Europe before and since the COVID-19 pandemic," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(3), pages 399-411, August.
    14. Lu, Liyong & Pan, Jay, 2019. "The association of hospital competition with inpatient costs of stroke: Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 234-245.
    15. Mohan, Gretta & Nolan, Anne & Lyons, Seán, 2019. "An investigation of the effect of accessibility to General Practitioner services on healthcare utilisation among older people," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 254-263.
    16. Elek, P. & Varadi, B. & Varga, M., 2014. "Effects of geographical accessibility on the use of outpatient care services: quasi-experimental evidence from administrative panel data," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 14/17, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    17. Henry J. Mayer & Michael R. Greenberg, 2005. "Using Integrated Geospatial Mapping and Conceptual Site Models to Guide Risk‐Based Environmental Clean‐Up Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 429-446, April.
    18. van de Bovenkamp, Hester & van Pijkeren, Nienke & Ree, Eline & Aase, Ingunn & Johannessen, Terese & Vollaard, Hans & Wallenburg, Iris & Bal, Roland & Wiig, Siri, 2023. "Creativity at the margins: A cross-country case study on how Dutch and Norwegian peripheries address challenges to quality work in care for older persons," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 66-73.
    19. Agnieszka Bem & Rafał Siedlecki & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Patrizia Gazzola & Bożena Ryszawska & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż, 2019. "Hospitals’ Financial Health in Rural and Urban Areas in Poland: Does It Ensure Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Tatjana Fischer, 2021. "Understanding the Spatial-Related Abstraction of Public Health Impact Goals and Measures: Illustrated by the Example of the Austrian Action Plan on Women’s Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    21. Glenn, N.M. & Frohlich, K.L. & Vallée, J., 2020. "Socio-spatial inequalities in smoking among young adults: What a ‘go-along’ study says about local smoking practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:327:y:2023:i:c:s0277953623003015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.