IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v265y2020ics0277953620306912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of interprofessional teamwork: Why three logics are better than one

Author

Listed:
  • Skyberg, Henriette Lund
  • Innvaer, Simon

Abstract

Much research has used three logics to understand the dynamics of interprofessionalism: 1) assimilation, that is, adapting the work of others; 2) segregation, where professional roles are separated and boundaries defended; and 3) integration, a perspective on the complementarity of professional roles. However, we found no studies analysing all three logics in connection with each other. Based on an ethnographic study of interprofessional teamwork in the field of mental health and substance use in Norway, this article explores the dynamics of interprofessionalism from all three perspectives. The data collection consisted of 14 observation sessions and 18 in-depth interviews of professionals in the field of health and social work. Investigating how, when and why each logic came into play, the results show the importance of including all three logics to leverage each one's purpose and function, and how they appear almost simultaneously in many situations. By investigating all three logics, the paper provides a broader, more comprehensive view of interprofessional teamwork.

Suggested Citation

  • Skyberg, Henriette Lund & Innvaer, Simon, 2020. "Dynamics of interprofessional teamwork: Why three logics are better than one," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:265:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620306912
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620306912
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xyrichis, Andreas & Lowton, Karen & Rafferty, Anne Marie, 2017. "Accomplishing professional jurisdiction in intensive care: An ethnographic study of three units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 102-111.
    2. Caronia, Letizia & Saglietti, Marzia & Chieregato, Arturo, 2020. "Challenging the interprofessional epistemic boundaries: The practices of informing in nurse-physician interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    3. Johannessen, Lars E.F., 2018. "Workplace assimilation and professional jurisdiction: How nurses learn to blur the nursing-medical boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 51-58.
    4. Lewin, Simon & Reeves, Scott, 2011. "Enacting 'team' and 'teamwork': Using Goffman's theory of impression management to illuminate interprofessional practice on hospital wards," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1595-1602, May.
    5. Finn, Rachael & Learmonth, Mark & Reedy, Patrick, 2010. "Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1148-1154, April.
    6. Nugus, Peter & Greenfield, David & Travaglia, Joanne & Westbrook, Johanna & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2010. "How and where clinicians exercise power: Interprofessional relations in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 898-909, September.
    7. Liberati, Elisa Giulia, 2017. "Separating, replacing, intersecting: The influence of context on the construction of the medical-nursing boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 135-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Yu-Che & Nkambule, Nothando S. & Xiao, Xaviera & Ngerng, Roy Y.L. & Monrouxe, Lynn V., 2021. "Safety net, gateway, market, sport, and war: Exploring how emergency physicians conceptualize and ascribe meaning to emergency care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caronia, Letizia & Saglietti, Marzia & Chieregato, Arturo, 2020. "Challenging the interprofessional epistemic boundaries: The practices of informing in nurse-physician interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Liberati, Elisa Giulia & Gorli, Mara & Scaratti, Giuseppe, 2016. "Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: Disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 31-39.
    3. Miner, Skye A., 2019. "Demarcating the dirty work: Canadian Fertility professionals’ use of boundary-work in contentious egg donation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 19-26.
    4. Xyrichis, Andreas & Lowton, Karen & Rafferty, Anne Marie, 2017. "Accomplishing professional jurisdiction in intensive care: An ethnographic study of three units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 102-111.
    5. Johannessen, Lars E.F., 2018. "Workplace assimilation and professional jurisdiction: How nurses learn to blur the nursing-medical boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 51-58.
    6. Bridgette Wessels & Jo Taylor & Lizzie Coates, 2017. "Telehealth in Community Nursing: A Negotiated Order," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 152-168, December.
    7. Neuwelt, Pat M. & Kearns, Robin A. & Browne, Annette J., 2015. "The place of receptionists in access to primary care: Challenges in the space between community and consultation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 287-295.
    8. Reiss, Michael & Greene, Carolyn A. & Ford, Julian D., 2017. "Is it time to talk? Understanding specialty child mental healthcare providers' decisions to engage in interdisciplinary communication with pediatricians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 66-71.
    9. Normand Carpentier, 2013. "Entry Into a Care Trajectory," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, June.
    10. Martin, Graham P. & Learmonth, Mark, 2012. "A critical account of the rise and spread of ‘leadership’: The case of UK healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 281-288.
    11. Rodriquez, Jason, 2015. "Who is on the medical team?: Shifting the boundaries of belonging on the ICU," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 112-118.
    12. Macinati, Manuela S. & Bozzi, Stefano & Rizzo, Marco Giovanni, 2016. "Budgetary participation and performance: The mediating effects of medical managers’ job engagement and self-efficacy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 1017-1028.
    13. Glimmerveen, Ludo & Ybema, Sierk & Nies, Henk, 2018. "Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 1-8.
    14. Liberati, Elisa Giulia, 2017. "Separating, replacing, intersecting: The influence of context on the construction of the medical-nursing boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 135-143.
    15. Mackintosh, Nicola & Humphrey, Charlotte & Sandall, Jane, 2014. "The habitus of ‘rescue’ and its significance for implementation of rapid response systems in acute health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 233-242.
    16. Keh Kiong Ong & Kit Cheng Ting & Yeow Leng Chow, 2018. "The trajectory of experience of critical care nurses in providing end‐of‐life care: A qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    17. Standing, Holly & Patterson, Rebecca & Dalkin, Sonia & Exley, Catherine & Brittain, Katie, 2020. "A critical exploration of professional jurisdictions and role boundaries in inter-professional end-of-life care in the community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Leigh, Jadwiga, 2017. "Recalcitrance, compliance and the presentation of self: Exploring the concept of organisational misbehaviour in an English local authority child protection service," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 612-619.
    19. Liberati, Elisa G. & Tarrant, Carolyn & Willars, Janet & Draycott, Tim & Winter, Cathy & Chew, Sarah & Dixon-Woods, Mary, 2019. "How to be a very safe maternity unit: An ethnographic study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 64-72.
    20. Tit‐Chai Tan & Huaqiong Zhou & Michelle Kelly, 2017. "Nurse–physician communication – An integrated review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3974-3989, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:265:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620306912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.