IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v120y2014icp85-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The narrative (re)production of prestige: How neurosurgeons teach medical students to valorise diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Johannessen, Lars E.F.

Abstract

It is well documented that doctors rate diseases in a prestige hierarchy, in which some diseases are valued more than others. However, little is known about how doctors acquire the knowledge to do this rating. Based on a fieldwork study of the teaching of neurosurgery at a Norwegian university hospital, this paper shows how notions of disease prestige are (re)produced through neurosurgeons' telling of disease narratives in medical education. The analysis presents their prestigious narrative of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), a rare form of stroke, which neurosurgeons presented as an acute and potentially lethal but curable disease. In contrast to perceivably more ordinary diseases, their portrayal of SAH references heroic narratives on a more abstract cultural level, casting neurosurgeons as masculine and extraordinary lifesavers, able to act where others fall short. By shedding light on how neurosurgeons teach students to evaluate diseases, the paper lays a foundation for reflecting upon the means and conditions that (re)produce their notions of disease prestige and contributes more generally to our understanding of medical culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannessen, Lars E.F., 2014. "The narrative (re)production of prestige: How neurosurgeons teach medical students to valorise diseases," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 85-91.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:120:y:2014:i:c:p:85-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614005802
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Linda M., 1994. "Practicing oncology in provincial Mexico: A narrative analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 843-853, March.
    2. Rosoff, Stephen M. & Leone, Matthew C., 1991. "The public prestige of medical specialties: Overviews and undercurrents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 321-326, January.
    3. Creed, Peter A. & Searle, Judy & Rogers, Mary E., 2010. "Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1084-1088, September.
    4. Album, Dag & Westin, Steinar, 2008. "Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 182-188, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Album, Dag & Johannessen, Lars E.F. & Rasmussen, Erik B., 2017. "Stability and change in disease prestige: A comparative analysis of three surveys spanning a quarter of a century," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 45-51.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elaine Kelly & Isabel Stockton, 2024. "A senior doctor like me: Gender match and occupational choice," IFS Working Papers W24/11, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Rodriguez, Jenny K. & Procter, Stephen & Perez Arrau, Gregorio, 2023. "Reconfigured professional purpose in times of crisis: Experiences of frontline healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    3. Creed, Peter A. & Searle, Judy & Rogers, Mary E., 2010. "Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1084-1088, September.
    4. Grue, Jan & Johannessen, Lars E.F. & Rasmussen, Erik Fossan, 2015. "Prestige rankings of chronic diseases and disabilities. A survey among professionals in the disability field," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 180-186.
    5. Album, Dag & Johannessen, Lars E.F. & Rasmussen, Erik B., 2017. "Stability and change in disease prestige: A comparative analysis of three surveys spanning a quarter of a century," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 45-51.
    6. Caoimhe Ní hÉalaithe & Aoife Howard & Paul Corcoran & Claire M McCarthy & Mary Horgan & Deirdre Bennett & Keelin O’Donoghue & Suzanne O’Sullivan, 2023. "Factors influencing medical students’ decision to pursue a career in obstetrics and gynaecology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Malik, Tariq H., 2019. "Society-nature-technology (SNT) nexus: Institutional causes and cures of national morbidities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 491-503.
    8. Ashley, Louise & McDonald, Ian, 2024. "When the Penny Drops: Understanding how social class influences speciality careers in the UK medical profession," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    9. Album, Dag & Westin, Steinar, 2008. "Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 182-188, January.
    10. Jerry W. Kim, 2020. "Halos and Egos: Rankings and Interspecialty Deference in Multispecialty U.S. Hospitals," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 2248-2268, May.
    11. Heikkilä, Teppo Juhani & Hyppölä, Harri & Aine, Tiina & Halila, Hannu & Vänskä, Jukka & Kujala, Santero & Virjo, Irma & Mattila, Kari, 2014. "How do doctors choose where they want to work? – Motives for choice of current workplace among physicians registered in Finland 1977–2006," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 109-117.
    12. Brendan McCormack & Astrid Skatvedt, 2017. "Older people and their care partners’ experiences of living with mental health needs: a focus on collaboration and cooperation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 103-114, January.
    13. Hofmann, Bjørn, 2020. "Biases distorting priority setting," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 52-60.
    14. Šlegerová, Lenka & Bryndová, Lucie & Michenka, Petr & Kočí, Martin, 2025. "The 2017 reform to medical specialty training in Czechia: Exploring student career preferences," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:120:y:2014:i:c:p:85-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.