IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v121y2026ics2214804326000169.html

Risk preferences and other (ignored) behavioral factors in fertilizer management decisions: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Moritz, Laura
  • Spada, Riccardo
  • Rommel, Jens
  • Dalhaus, Tobias
  • Cerroni, Simone

Abstract

Fertilizer management decisions entail significant economic and environmental implications at the farm and global levels. However, both underuse and overuse of fertilizers often occur, deviating from the economically optimal use. This raises the question of why non-optimal fertilizer behavior persists. One possible explanation is the influence of behavioral factors on farmers' decision-making processes. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of behavioral factors in decision-making under risk and uncertainty, focusing on their association with fertilizer decisions in high-income countries. Fertilizer management decisions are inherently risky due to the presence of different sources of uncertainty, such as fertilizer prices, crop yields, and output prices. Our review of 64 peer-reviewed articles shows that most research focuses exclusively on farmers’ risk preferences, often using expected utility theory. Few notable exceptions incorporate broader behavioral considerations. Our findings highlight the need for future research that extends beyond risk preferences and incorporates non-standard decision theories into fertilizer decision models. This could help explain some of the non-optimal fertilizer behaviors observed in practice. Finally, we emphasize the importance of combining primary data-driven behavioral research with secondary data to create a more comprehensive understanding of fertilizer decision-making. These insights may be applicable to other decision-making within and beyond agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Moritz, Laura & Spada, Riccardo & Rommel, Jens & Dalhaus, Tobias & Cerroni, Simone, 2026. "Risk preferences and other (ignored) behavioral factors in fertilizer management decisions: A systematic literature review," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:121:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000169
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000169
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:121:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.