IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v52y2015icp357-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance analyzes of different photovoltaic module technologies under İzmit, Kocaeli climatic conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Başoğlu, Mustafa E.
  • Kazdaloğlu, Abdulvehhap
  • Erfidan, Tarık
  • Bilgin, Mehmet Z.
  • Çakır, Bekir

Abstract

This paper presents an energy performance analysis of three different photovoltaic (PV) modules technologies under İzmit, Kocaeli weather conditions in Northwest of Turkey. Some comparative analyzes were conducted for showing solar energy potential of İzmit, Kocaeli. For this purpose, by using crystalline (c-Si), multi crystalline (mc-Si) and cadmium–telluride (Cd–Te) modules, three on-grid photovoltaic power systems (PPS) were installed on the rooftop of the Engineering Faculty at Kocaeli University. These PPSs were monitored from October, 2013 to December, 2014. In order to determine the energy performances of PV modules and PPSs, normalized energy of systems, performance ratios (PRs), mean array efficiencies (MAEs) and capacity factors (CFs) were calculated. The results show that due to the low dependency on weather changes, MAE of Cd–Te arrays result in higher value than that of the other arrays. Changes in PRs of c-Si and mc-Si arrays are lower than Cd–Te arrays within the measurement period and mean values of PRs are 83.8%, 82.05% and 89.76% for mc-Si, c-Si and Cd–Te arrays, respectively. Since Cd–Te array has the highest CF during all months, Cd–Te array can be accepted as more reliable array under İzmit climatic condition. On the other hand, one of the outcomes of this study is to reveal the solar energy potential of İzmit by on-site measurements. So, it is shown that contrary to measurement taken between 1985 and 2006 from 156 stations by General Directorate of Renewable Energy (GDRE) and Turkish State Meteorological Service (DMI), İzmit has more solar energy potential by rate of 23.79%.

Suggested Citation

  • Başoğlu, Mustafa E. & Kazdaloğlu, Abdulvehhap & Erfidan, Tarık & Bilgin, Mehmet Z. & Çakır, Bekir, 2015. "Performance analyzes of different photovoltaic module technologies under İzmit, Kocaeli climatic conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 357-365.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:357-365
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115007558
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khalid, Ahmad Mohd & Mitra, Indradip & Warmuth, Werner & Schacht, Volker, 2016. "Performance ratio – Crucial parameter for grid connected PV plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1139-1158.
    2. Kumar, Manish & Kumar, Arun, 2017. "Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-587.
    3. Zhong, Qing & Tong, Daoqin, 2020. "Spatial layout optimization for solar photovoltaic (PV) panel installation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Visa, Ion & Burduhos, Bogdan & Neagoe, Mircea & Moldovan, Macedon & Duta, Anca, 2016. "Comparative analysis of the infield response of five types of photovoltaic modules," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 178-190.
    5. Isabel Santiago & David Trillo Montero & Juan J. Luna Rodríguez & Isabel M. Moreno Garcia & Emilio J. Palacios Garcia, 2017. "Graphical Diagnosis of Performances in Photovoltaic Systems: A Case Study in Southern Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, November.
    6. Elibol, Erdem & Özmen, Özge Tüzün & Tutkun, Nedim & Köysal, Oğuz, 2017. "Outdoor performance analysis of different PV panel types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 651-661.
    7. Adar, Mustapha & Najih, Youssef & Gouskir, Mohamed & Chebak, Ahmed & Mabrouki, Mustapha & Bennouna, Amin, 2020. "Three PV plants performance analysis using the principal component analysis method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    8. Irshad, Ahmad Shah & Ludin, Gul Ahmad & Masrur, Hasan & Ahmadi, Mikaeel & Yona, Atsushi & Mikhaylov, Alexey & Krishnan, Narayanan & Senjyu, Tomonobu, 2023. "Optimization of grid-photovoltaic and battery hybrid system with most technically efficient PV technology after the performance analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 714-730.
    9. Başoğlu, Mustafa Engin & Çakır, Bekir, 2016. "Comparisons of MPPT performances of isolated and non-isolated DC–DC converters by using a new approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1100-1113.
    10. Balaska, Amira & Tahri, Ali & Tahri, Fatima & Stambouli, Amine Boudghene, 2017. "Performance assessment of five different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions in Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:52:y:2015:i:c:p:357-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.