IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v208y2025ics1364032124007536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretable machine learning-assisted advanced exergy optimization for carbon-neutral olefins production

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Qingchun
  • Zhao, Lei
  • Bao, Runjie
  • Fan, Yingjie
  • Zhou, Jianlong
  • Rong, Dongwen
  • Zhou, Huairong
  • Zhang, Dawei

Abstract

The CO2-to-light olefins technology represents a significant approach to mitigating the greenhouse effect and advancing green energy solutions. However, little literature comprehensively analyzes and optimizes its thermodynamic performance. This study proposes an interpretable machine learning-assisted advanced exergy analysis and optimization framework to ascertain the actual improvement potential and determine effective strategies for optimizing this system. The advanced exergy analysis method aims to identify the avoidable exergy destruction and interactions between components of the system, while integrating an interpretable machine learning model to provide the key parameters for enhancing the system's exergy efficiency through feature importance analysis. The findings indicate that the exergy destruction of the system amounts to 656.06 MW, with 96.81 % of this exergy destruction being attributed to endogenous factors and approximately 66.51 % of it being potentially avoidable. The random forest model, exhibiting superior predictive accuracy compared to other machine learning models, is coupled with the interpretable Shapley additive explanation approach to discern the most crucial parameters of the system. Results indicated catalyst properties have the greatest impact on the output performance of the system, contributing up to 66.1 % to the predicted results. The active component type, reaction temperature, and promoter content have the largest contribution to the prediction of CO2 conversion ratio and light olefins selectivity. Furthermore, the key input features are optimized by screening for better catalysts and conducting sensitivity analysis. After optimization, the system's avoidable exergy destruction is significantly saved by 32.27 %, resulting in an enhancement in exergy efficiency by 8.12 %.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Qingchun & Zhao, Lei & Bao, Runjie & Fan, Yingjie & Zhou, Jianlong & Rong, Dongwen & Zhou, Huairong & Zhang, Dawei, 2025. "Interpretable machine learning-assisted advanced exergy optimization for carbon-neutral olefins production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:208:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124007536
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.115027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007536
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsatsaronis, Georgios & Winhold, Michael, 1985. "Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants—I. A new general methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 69-80.
    2. Shen, Yuxuan & Pan, Yue, 2023. "BIM-supported automatic energy performance analysis for green building design using explainable machine learning and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    3. Shokri Kalan, Ali & Heidarabadi, Shadab & Khaleghi, Mohammad & Ghiasirad, Hamed & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna, 2023. "Biomass-to-energy integrated trigeneration system using supercritical CO2 and modified Kalina cycles: Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Liu, Chenglin & Zhao, Lei & Zhu, Shun & Shen, Yuefeng & Yu, Jianhua & Yang, Qingchun, 2023. "Advanced exergy analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol (CtEG) process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Carassai, Anna, 2012. "Conventional and advanced exergetic analyses applied to a combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 146-152.
    6. Tsatsaronis, George, 2007. "Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 249-253.
    7. Iris C. ten Have & Josepha J. G. Kromwijk & Matteo Monai & Davide Ferri & Ellen B. Sterk & Florian Meirer & Bert M. Weckhuysen, 2022. "Uncovering the reaction mechanism behind CoO as active phase for CO2 hydrogenation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Perera, A.T.D. & Wickramasinghe, P.U. & Nik, Vahid M. & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis, 2019. "Machine learning methods to assist energy system optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 191-205.
    9. Tsatsaronis, George, 2024. "The future of exergy-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    10. Tsatsaronis, Georgios & Winhold, Michael, 1985. "Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation of energy-conversion plants—II. Analysis of a coal-fired steam power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 81-94.
    11. Liu, Lintong & Zhai, Rongrong & Hu, Yangdi, 2023. "Multi-objective optimization with advanced exergy analysis of a wind-solar‑hydrogen multi-energy supply system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    2. Hofmann, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Comparative exergoeconomic assessment of coal-fired power plants – Binary Rankine cycle versus conventional steam cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 168-179.
    3. Ligang Wang & Yongping Yang & Changqing Dong & Zhiping Yang & Gang Xu & Lingnan Wu, 2012. "Exergoeconomic Evaluation of a Modern Ultra-Supercritical Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Tsatsaronis, George & Morosuk, Tatiana & Paitazoglou, Christopher, 2012. "Environmental evaluation of a power plant using conventional and advanced exergy-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 23-30.
    5. Coban, Kahraman & Şöhret, Yasin & Colpan, C. Ozgur & Karakoç, T. Hikmet, 2017. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a small-scale turbojet fuelled with biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P2), pages 1358-1367.
    6. Sciubba, Enrico, 2024. "A possible reconciliation between exergy analysis, thermo-economics and the resource cost of externalities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    7. Yang, Qingchun & Qian, Yu & Kraslawski, Andrzej & Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Siyu, 2016. "Framework for advanced exergoeconomic performance analysis and optimization of an oil shale retorting process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 62-76.
    8. Adrian Bejan & George Tsatsaronis, 2021. "Purpose in Thermodynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Ligang Wang & Zhiping Yang & Shivom Sharma & Alberto Mian & Tzu-En Lin & George Tsatsaronis & François Maréchal & Yongping Yang, 2018. "A Review of Evaluation, Optimization and Synthesis of Energy Systems: Methodology and Application to Thermal Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-53, December.
    10. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    11. Usón, Sergio & Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Stanek, Wojciech & Gazda, Wiesław, 2015. "Thermoecological cost of electricity, heat and cold generated in a trigeneration module fuelled with selected fossil and renewable fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 308-319.
    12. Cafaro, S. & Napoli, L. & Traverso, A. & Massardo, A.F., 2010. "Monitoring of the thermoeconomic performance in an actual combined cycle power plant bottoming cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 902-910.
    13. Tonon, S. & Brown, M.T. & Luchi, F. & Mirandola, A. & Stoppato, A. & Ulgiati, S., 2006. "An integrated assessment of energy conversion processes by means of thermodynamic, economic and environmental parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 149-163.
    14. Rivero, Ricardo & Rendón, Consuelo & Gallegos, Salvador, 2004. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a crude oil combined distillation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1909-1927.
    15. Piacentino, Antonio & Cardona, Fabio, 2010. "Scope-Oriented Thermoeconomic analysis of energy systems. Part I: Looking for a non-postulated cost accounting for the dissipative devices of a vapour compression chiller. Is it feasible?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 943-956, March.
    16. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    17. Manassaldi, Juan I. & Mussati, Sergio F. & Scenna, Nicolás J., 2011. "Optimal synthesis and design of Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) via mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 475-485.
    18. Şöhret, Yasin & Açıkkalp, Emin & Hepbasli, Arif & Karakoc, T. Hikmet, 2015. "Advanced exergy analysis of an aircraft gas turbine engine: Splitting exergy destructions into parts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1219-1228.
    19. Erbay, Zafer & Hepbasli, Arif, 2017. "Assessment of cost sources and improvement potentials of a ground-source heat pump food drying system through advanced exergoeconomic analysis method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 502-515.
    20. Valero, Antonio & Usón, Sergio & Torres, César & Valero, Alicia & Agudelo, Andrés & Costa, Jorge, 2013. "Thermoeconomic tools for the analysis of eco-industrial parks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-72.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:208:y:2025:i:c:s1364032124007536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.