IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v193y2022icp821-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical model for fluid flow distribution in an Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)

Author

Listed:
  • Asai, Pranay
  • Podgorney, Robert
  • McLennan, John
  • Deo, Milind
  • Moore, Joseph

Abstract

Enhanced geothermal system (EGS) is often envisioned to consist of at least two wells spaced sufficiently apart and connected by hydraulic fractures that serve as flow paths. All the flow paths must be utilized efficiently to ensure the system is operated at its highest potential. However, building an efficient and sustainable EGS is a complicated process as the fluid always chooses the path of least resistance, which can lead to uneven flow distribution. This study focuses on several critical parameters related to well designs, which can potentially allow for optimized flow distribution. An analytical model (written in Python) is developed based on Kirchhoff's law to calculate the flow distribution in any doublet EGS. Wellbore perforations, the completed wellbores and the fractures are simulated as resistance while the fluid is simulated as a current analog. The model solves the pressure at each node, analogous to voltage, using pipe flow equations and Darcy's law. Three different doublets EGS designs (parallel, anti-parallel and non-parallel) were simulated using the model, and a detailed sensitivity study was performed. Anti-parallel doublet systems perform the best in terms of better fluid distribution and at a lower frictional loss. It was also observed that the flow distribution in a doublet system can be affected by fracture permeability, perforation size and flow rate. Higher permeability fracture leads to poor fluid distribution. Smaller perforation size improves the fluid distribution, but it leads to huge frictional losses. Low flow rates also help with optimized fluid distribution but would eventually lead to low heat output.

Suggested Citation

  • Asai, Pranay & Podgorney, Robert & McLennan, John & Deo, Milind & Moore, Joseph, 2022. "Analytical model for fluid flow distribution in an Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 821-831.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:193:y:2022:i:c:p:821-831
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122007261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dejan Brkić, 2011. "Iterative Methods for Looped Network Pipeline Calculation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(12), pages 2951-2987, September.
    2. Xia, Yidong & Plummer, Mitchell & Mattson, Earl & Podgorney, Robert & Ghassemi, Ahmad, 2017. "Design, modeling, and evaluation of a doublet heat extraction model in enhanced geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 232-247.
    3. Li, Mengying & Lior, Noam, 2015. "Energy analysis for guiding the design of well systems of deep Enhanced Geothermal Systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1173-1188.
    4. Asai, Pranay & Panja, Palash & McLennan, John & Moore, Joseph, 2018. "Performance evaluation of enhanced geothermal system (EGS): Surrogate models, sensitivity study and ranking key parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 184-195.
    5. Asai, Pranay & Panja, Palash & McLennan, John & Moore, Joseph, 2019. "Efficient workflow for simulation of multifractured enhanced geothermal systems (EGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 763-777.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Qitao & Dahi Taleghani, Arash, 2023. "Autonomous fracture flow tunning to enhance efficiency of fractured geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    2. Qu, Hai & Li, Chengying & Chen, Xiangjun & Liu, Xu & Guo, Ruichang & Liu, Ying, 2023. "LN cooling on mechanical properties and fracture characteristics of hot dry granites involving ANN prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. McLean, Matthew L. & Espinoza, D. Nicolas, 2023. "Thermal destressing: Implications for short-circuiting in enhanced geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 736-755.
    4. Gao, Xiang & Li, Tailu & Meng, Nan & Gao, Haiyang & Li, Xuelong & Gao, Ruizhao & Wang, Zeyu & Wang, Jingyi, 2023. "Supercritical flow and heat transfer of SCO2 in geothermal reservoir under non-Darcy's law combined with power generation from hot dry rock," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 428-440.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asai, Pranay & Panja, Palash & McLennan, John & Deo, Milind, 2019. "Effect of different flow schemes on heat recovery from Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 667-676.
    2. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu & Zhang, Haijun, 2020. "Numerical simulation study on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 782-795.
    3. Zhang, Jie & Xie, Jingxuan, 2020. "Effect of reservoir’s permeability and porosity on the performance of cellular development model for enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 824-838.
    4. Asai, Pranay & Panja, Palash & McLennan, John & Moore, Joseph, 2019. "Efficient workflow for simulation of multifractured enhanced geothermal systems (EGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 763-777.
    5. Linkai Li & Xiao Guo & Ming Zhou & Gang Xiang & Ning Zhang & Yue Wang & Shengyuan Wang & Arnold Landjobo Pagou, 2021. "The Investigation of Fracture Networks on Heat Extraction Performance for an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Akdas, Satuk Bugra & Onur, Mustafa, 2022. "Analytical solutions for predicting and optimizing geothermal energy extraction from an enhanced geothermal system with a multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal-well doublet," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 567-580.
    7. Meng, Nan & Li, Tailu & Wang, Jianqiang & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua & Qin, Haosen, 2020. "Synergetic mechanism of fracture properties and system configuration on techno-economic performance of enhanced geothermal system for power generation during life cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 910-924.
    8. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu & Liu, Xuemei & Liu, Hongliang, 2020. "Analysis on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system based on leaf-like bifurcated fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    10. Xue, Zhenqian & Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Chi & Ma, Haoming & Chen, Zhangxin, 2023. "Comparative data-driven enhanced geothermal systems forecasting models: A case study of Qiabuqia field in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    11. Zhang, Qitao & Dahi Taleghani, Arash, 2023. "Autonomous fracture flow tunning to enhance efficiency of fractured geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    12. Zhang, Chao & Jiang, Guangzheng & Jia, Xiaofeng & Li, Shengtao & Zhang, Shengsheng & Hu, Di & Hu, Shengbiao & Wang, Yibo, 2019. "Parametric study of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system: A case study at the Qiabuqia geothermal area, northeast Tibetan plateau," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 959-978.
    13. Zhang, Yu & Zhang, Yanjun & Zhou, Ling & Lei, Zhihong & Guo, Liangliang & Zhou, Jian, 2022. "Reservoir stimulation design and evaluation of heat exploitation of a two-horizontal-well enhanced geothermal system (EGS) in the Zhacang geothermal field, Northwest China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 330-350.
    14. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    15. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    16. Vadim Fetisov & Aleksey V. Shalygin & Svetlana A. Modestova & Vladimir K. Tyan & Changjin Shao, 2022. "Development of a Numerical Method for Calculating a Gas Supply System during a Period of Change in Thermal Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Aliyu, Musa D. & Chen, Hua-Peng, 2018. "Enhanced geothermal system modelling with multiple pore media: Thermo-hydraulic coupled processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 931-948.
    18. Lin, David T.W. & Hsieh, Jui Ching & Shih, Bo Yen, 2019. "The optimization of geothermal extraction based on supercritical CO2 porous heat transfer model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1162-1171.
    19. Kang, Fangchao & Li, Yingchun & Tang, Chun'an & Huang, Xin & Li, Tianjiao, 2022. "Competition between cooling contraction and fluid overpressure on aperture evolution in a geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 704-716.
    20. Ma, Weiwu & Wang, Yadan & Wu, Xiaotian & Liu, Gang, 2020. "Hot dry rock (HDR) hydraulic fracturing propagation and impact factors assessment via sensitivity indicator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2716-2723.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:193:y:2022:i:c:p:821-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.