IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v162y2020icp2272-2284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergistic co-digestion of waste commercial yeast and chicken manure: Kinetic simulation, DOM variation and microbial community assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Fang, Hongli
  • Shi, Yongsen
  • Li, Dunjie
  • Song, Liuying
  • Li, Yu-You
  • Liu, Rutao
  • Yuan, Dong
  • Niu, Qigui

Abstract

Co-digestion of waste commercial yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and chicken manure was investigated in batch tests. The objective was to explore potential synergistic effects of the combination substrates. The biogas production rate and biomethane yield, batch kinetic simulation, metabolic dynamic and microbial community comparison were evaluated, respectively. The maximum biomethane yield of 364.79 mL/gVS was obtained at the optimum co-digestion feedstock (S.cerevisiae of 0.69 g/gVS) with a significant reaction rate increased of hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. Person’s correlation analysis resulted that the dissolved organic matter (DOM) variation had a close correlation with indexes of NADH, NH4+-N, COD, VFAs and F420. The high-throughput sequencing showed that higher diversity was obtained both bacteria and archaea in the optimized condition with more abundant of synergistic bacteria. Moreover, community dynamic reflected that the abundances of hydrogentrophic Methanobacterium and Methanolinea raised from 11.74%, 0.23%–14.49%, 60.78%, respectively. While the proportion of the acetoclastic Methanosaeta was decreased from 88.04% to 24.72% with the increasing of S.cerevisiae dosages from 0.48 g/gVS to1.07 g/gVS.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang, Hongli & Shi, Yongsen & Li, Dunjie & Song, Liuying & Li, Yu-You & Liu, Rutao & Yuan, Dong & Niu, Qigui, 2020. "Synergistic co-digestion of waste commercial yeast and chicken manure: Kinetic simulation, DOM variation and microbial community assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 2272-2284.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:162:y:2020:i:c:p:2272-2284
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120316050
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marin-Batista, J.D. & Villamil, J.A. & Qaramaleki, S.V. & Coronella, C.J. & Mohedano, A.F. & Rubia, M.A. de la, 2020. "Energy valorization of cow manure by hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 623-632.
    2. Alvarez, René & Lidén, Gunnar, 2008. "Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 726-734.
    3. Alfa, M.I. & Adie, D.B. & Igboro, S.B. & Oranusi, U.S. & Dahunsi, S.O. & Akali, D.M., 2014. "Assessment of biofertilizer quality and health implications of anaerobic digestion effluent of cow dung and chicken droppings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 681-686.
    4. Merlin Christy, P. & Gopinath, L.R. & Divya, D., 2014. "A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 167-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Logan, Mohanakrishnan & Tan, Lea Chua & Nzeteu, Corine Orline & Lens, Piet N.L., 2023. "Effect of selenate on treatment of glycerol containing wastewater in UASB reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 97-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Latifi, Pooria & Karrabi, Mohsen & Danesh, Shahnaz, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with sewage sludge in batch-mode bioreactors (effect of inoculum-substrate ratio and total solids)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 288-296.
    2. Mahmudul, H.M. & Rasul, M.G. & Akbar, D. & Narayanan, R. & Mofijur, M., 2022. "Food waste as a source of sustainable energy: Technical, economical, environmental and regulatory feasibility analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    4. Kit Wayne Chew & Shir Reen Chia & Hong-Wei Yen & Saifuddin Nomanbhay & Yeek-Chia Ho & Pau Loke Show, 2019. "Transformation of Biomass Waste into Sustainable Organic Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    6. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Daniel Ddiba & Kim Andersson & Arno Rosemarin & Helfrid Schulte-Herbrüggen & Sarah Dickin, 2022. "The circular economy potential of urban organic waste streams in low- and middle-income countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1116-1144, January.
    8. Granada, Camille E. & Hasan, Camila & Marder, Munique & Konrad, Odorico & Vargas, Luciano K. & Passaglia, Luciane M.P. & Giongo, Adriana & de Oliveira, Rafael R. & Pereira, Leandro de M. & de Jesus Tr, 2018. "Biogas from slaughterhouse wastewater anaerobic digestion is driven by the archaeal family Methanobacteriaceae and bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae and Tissierellaceae," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 840-846.
    9. Tonanzi, B. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A. & Montecchio, D. & Pagliaccia, P. & Rossetti, S. & Braguglia, C.M., 2021. "Elucidating the key factors in semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of urban biowaste: The crucial role of sludge addition in process stability, microbial community enrichment and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 272-284.
    10. Garfí, Marianna & Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Garwood, Anna & Ferrer, Ivet, 2016. "Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 599-614.
    11. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Pozarlik, A.K. & Bramer, E.A. & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Pawlak-Kruczek, H. & Brem, G., 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization of wet biomass from nitrogen and phosphorus approach: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 401-415.
    12. Chiu, Su-Fang & Chiu, Juei-Yu & Kuo, Wen-Chien, 2013. "Biological stoichiometric analysis of nutrition and ammonia toxicity in thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of organic substrates under different organic loading rates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 323-329.
    13. Gulhane, Madhuri & Pandit, Prabhakar & Khardenavis, Anshuman & Singh, Dharmesh & Purohit, Hemant, 2017. "Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in Anaerobic Baffled Reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 59-66.
    14. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    15. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    16. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    17. Ganzoury, Mohamed A. & Allam, Nageh K., 2015. "Impact of nanotechnology on biogas production: A mini-review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1392-1404.
    18. Divya, D. & Gopinath, L.R. & Merlin Christy, P., 2015. "A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 690-699.
    19. Liu, Xiao & Gao, Xingbao & Wang, Wei & Zheng, Lei & Zhou, Yingjun & Sun, Yifei, 2012. "Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: Focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 463-468.
    20. Kyoung S. Ro & Michael A. Jackson & Ariel A. Szogi & David L. Compton & Bryan R. Moser & Nicole D. Berge, 2022. "Sub- and Near-Critical Hydrothermal Carbonization of Animal Manures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:162:y:2020:i:c:p:2272-2284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.