IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v145y2020icp180-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analyses of three olive mill solid residues from different countries and processes for energy recovery by gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Ducom, Gaëlle
  • Gautier, Mathieu
  • Pietraccini, Matteo
  • Tagutchou, Jean-Philippe
  • Lebouil, David
  • Gourdon, Rémy

Abstract

Biomass is a renewable energy source which may provide a significant contribution to the reduction of fossil fuels consumption and the associated environmental impacts. The use of agricultural or agro-industrial waste such as solid residues from olive oil production is particularly relevant since it may combine several benefits. Gasification is a promising waste-to-energy technique for this type of lignocellulosic residues. The technology however is adapted to a relatively limited panel of solid waste fuels of defined specifications, which must therefore be characterized properly to assess their adaptation. The purpose of this research was to analyze and compare three different olive mill solid residues by complementary techniques such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermochemical methods, in order to characterize these residues as potential fuels for gasification. The results obtained underlined the complex nature of the residues and indicated that they were mainly organic, with very little mineral matter. In addition to the major organic components (cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin), the presence of several minor organic constituents was shown by thermogravimetry coupled to differential scanning calorimetry and FTIR. The gas produced from pyrolysis was analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. It was found to contain several degradation products from lignocellulosic material and olive oil, such as hydroxyacetone, furfural and methoxyphenols. The influence of the olive oil extraction process (two-phase or three-phase) was also demonstrated. It was shown that the thermochemical degradation of olive mill residues followed a complex pathway but the composition of the residues met the requirements for gasification for most parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Ducom, Gaëlle & Gautier, Mathieu & Pietraccini, Matteo & Tagutchou, Jean-Philippe & Lebouil, David & Gourdon, Rémy, 2020. "Comparative analyses of three olive mill solid residues from different countries and processes for energy recovery by gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 180-189.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:145:y:2020:i:c:p:180-189
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014811930789X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramos, João S. & Ferreira, Ana F., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of olive and wine industry co-products valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:145:y:2020:i:c:p:180-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.