IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v94y2009i5p982-989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A virtual age model based on a bathtub shaped initial intensity

Author

Listed:
  • Dijoux, Yann

Abstract

This paper presents a new reliability model for complex repairable systems, which combines a bathtub shaped ageing and imperfect maintenance. A bathtub shaped initial intensity function allows to take into account the burn-in period, the useful life and wear out of the systems. Repair effect is expressed by a reduction of the system virtual age, which depends on the ageing of the system. The main characteristics of the model are derived. The most important one is that the maintenance efficiency allows an extension of the system useful life duration. A statistical analysis of the model and an application to real failure data are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Dijoux, Yann, 2009. "A virtual age model based on a bathtub shaped initial intensity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 982-989.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:5:p:982-989
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.11.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832008002676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2008.11.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2007. "A flexible Weibull extension," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 719-726.
    2. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2007. "On statistical and information-based virtual age of degrading systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(5), pages 676-681.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    2. Zheng, Rui & Zhao, Xufeng & Hu, Chaoming & Ren, Xiangyun, 2023. "A repair-replacement policy for a system subject to missions of random types and random durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    4. Hu, Wei & Yang, Zhaojun & Chen, Chuanhai & Wu, Yue & Xie, Qunya, 2021. "A Weibull-based recurrent regression model for repairable systems considering double effects of operation and maintenance: A case study of machine tools," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Remy, Emmanuel & Corset, Franck & Despréaux, Stéphane & Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier, 2013. "An example of integrated approach to technical and economic optimization of maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 8-19.
    6. Lucianne Varn & Stefanka Chukova & Richard Arnold, 2019. "A stochastic process for modeling failures of a system having a non-monotonic hazard rate function," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 731-746, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    2. Hadi Saboori & Ghobad Barmalzan & Seyyed Masih Ayat, 2020. "Generalized Modified Inverse Weibull Distribution: Its Properties and Applications," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 247-269, November.
    3. Gauss M. Cordeiro & Giovana O. Silva & Edwin M. M. Ortega, 2016. "An extended-G geometric family," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Bebbington, Mark & Lai, Chin-Diew & Zitikis, RiÄ ardas, 2009. "Balancing burn-in and mission times in environments with catastrophic and repairable failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1314-1321.
    5. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2018. "Optimizing availability of heterogeneous standby systems exposed to shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 137-145.
    6. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2009. "Virtual age of non-repairable objects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 666-669.
    7. Gupta, Ashutosh & Mukherjee, Bhaswati & Upadhyay, S.K., 2008. "Weibull extension model: A Bayes study using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1434-1443.
    8. Devendra Kumar & Neetu Jain & Mazen Nassar & Osama Eraki Abo-Kasem, 2021. "Parameter Estimation for the Exponentiated Kumaraswamy-Power Function Distribution Based on Order Statistics with Application," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 785-811, December.
    9. Silva, Rodrigo B. & Bourguignon, Marcelo & Dias, Cícero R.B. & Cordeiro, Gauss M., 2013. "The compound class of extended Weibull power series distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 352-367.
    10. Ning Wang & Hailun Zhang & Ruoning Lv & Yangming Guo & Peican Zhu, 2022. "An investigation of reliability optimization in standby systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 237-247, April.
    11. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Chukova, Stefanka, 2011. "On optimal upgrade level for used products under given cost structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 286-291.
    12. S. Nadarajah & S. Bakar, 2013. "A new R package for actuarial survival models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 2139-2160, October.
    13. C. Satheesh Kumar & S. Dharmaja, 2014. "On some properties of Kies distribution," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 72(1), pages 97-122, April.
    14. MARK BEBBINGTON & CHIN-DIEW LAI & RIcARDAS ZITIKIS, 2011. "Modelling Deceleration in Senescent Mortality," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 18-37.
    15. Zhang, Tieling & Dwight, Richard, 2013. "Choosing an optimal model for failure data analysis by graphical approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 111-123.
    16. Almalki, Saad J. & Nadarajah, Saralees, 2014. "Modifications of the Weibull distribution: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 32-55.
    17. Finkelstein, Maxim, 2015. "On the optimal degree of imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 54-58.
    18. Lo, Hui-Chiung & Yu, Rouh-Yun, 2013. "A study of quality management strategy for reused products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 172-177.
    19. Ahmad, Abd EL-Baset A. & Ghazal, M.G.M., 2020. "Exponentiated additive Weibull distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Fu, Yuqiang & Wang, Jun, 2022. "Optimum periodic maintenance policy of repairable multi-component system with component reallocation and system overhaul," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:5:p:982-989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.