IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v92y2007i12p1716-1723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-based reconfiguration of safety monitoring system using dynamic Bayesian network

Author

Listed:
  • Kohda, Takehisa
  • Cui, Weimin

Abstract

To prevent an abnormal event from leading to an accident, the role of its safety monitoring system is very important. The safety monitoring system detects symptoms of an abnormal event to mitigate its effect at its early stage. As the operation time passes by, the sensor reliability decreases, which implies that the decision criteria of the safety monitoring system should be modified depending on the sensor reliability as well as the system reliability. This paper presents a framework for the decision criteria (or diagnosis logic) of the safety monitoring system. The logic can be dynamically modified based on sensor output data monitored at regular intervals to minimize the expected loss caused by two types of safety monitoring system failure events: failed-dangerous (FD) and failed-safe (FS). The former corresponds to no response under an abnormal system condition, while the latter implies a spurious activation under a normal system condition. Dynamic Bayesian network theory can be applied to modeling the entire system behavior composed of the system and its safety monitoring system. Using the estimated state probabilities, the optimal decision criterion is given to obtain the optimal diagnosis logic. An illustrative example of a three-sensor system shows the merits and characteristics of the proposed method, where the reasonable interpretation of sensor data can be obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Kohda, Takehisa & Cui, Weimin, 2007. "Risk-based reconfiguration of safety monitoring system using dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1716-1723.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:12:p:1716-1723
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.09.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832006002146
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2006.09.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matellini, D.B. & Wall, A.D. & Jenkinson, I.D. & Wang, J. & Pritchard, R., 2013. "Modelling dwelling fire development and occupancy escape using Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-91.
    2. Chuan Wang & Yupeng Liu & Wen Hou & Chao Yu & Guorong Wang & Yuyan Zheng, 2021. "Reliability and availability modeling of Subsea Autonomous High Integrity Pressure Protection System with partial stroke test by Dynamic Bayesian," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 268-281, April.
    3. Dante B Matellini & Alan D Wall & Ian D Jenkinson & Jin Wang & Robert W Pritchard, 2013. "A study of human reaction during the initial stages of a dwelling fire using a Bayesian network model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(2), pages 207-221, April.
    4. Khakzad, Nima, 2015. "Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 263-272.
    5. Luo, Pengcheng & Hu, Yang, 2013. "System risk evolution analysis and risk critical event identification based on event sequence diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 36-44.
    6. Wang, Chuan & Liu, Yupeng & Wang, Dongbo & Wang, Guorong & Wang, Dingya & Yu, Chao, 2021. "Reliability evaluation method based on dynamic fault diagnosis results: A case study of a seabed mud lifting system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Nima Khakzad, 2018. "Which Fire to Extinguish First? A Risk‐Informed Approach to Emergency Response in Oil Terminals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1444-1454, July.
    8. Zhong, Shengtong & Langseth, Helge & Nielsen, Thomas Dyhre, 2014. "A classification-based approach to monitoring the safety of dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-71.
    9. D. B. Matellini & A. D. Wall & I. D. Jenkinson & J. Wang & R. Pritchard, 2018. "A Three‐Part Bayesian Network for Modeling Dwelling Fires and Their Impact upon People and Property," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2087-2104, October.
    10. Wu, Shengnan & Zhang, Qiao & Li, Bin & Zhang, Laibin & Zheng, Wenpei & Li, Zhong & Li, Zhandong & Liu, Yiliu, 2023. "Reliability analysis of subsea wellhead system subject to fatigue and degradation during service life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    11. Li, Mei & Liu, Zixian & Li, Xiaopeng & Liu, Yiliu, 2019. "Dynamic risk assessment in healthcare based on Bayesian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 327-334.
    12. Cai, Baoping & Liu, Yonghong & Ma, Yunpeng & Huang, Lei & Liu, Zengkai, 2015. "A framework for the reliability evaluation of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in the presence of intermittent faults," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1308-1320.
    13. Amin, Md. Tanjin & Khan, Faisal & Imtiaz, Syed, 2018. "Dynamic availability assessment of safety critical systems using a dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 108-117.
    14. Lewis, Austin D. & Groth, Katrina M., 2023. "A comparison of DBN model performance in SIPPRA health monitoring based on different data stream discretization methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:92:y:2007:i:12:p:1716-1723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.