IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v55y2011i5p541-547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilisation of steel slags as neutralising agents in biooxidation of a refractory gold concentrate and their influence on the subsequent cyanidation

Author

Listed:
  • Gahan, Chandra Sekhar
  • Sundkvist, Jan-Eric
  • Engström, Fredrik
  • Sandström, Åke

Abstract

A study on the possibilities to utilise steel slag as neutralising agent in biooxidation of a refractory gold concentrate has been done with reference to commercial grade slaked lime. The idea has been to reduce the operating costs for neutralisation in the biooxidation plant, which is known to be the second largest operating cost. Other benefits would be savings in cost for landfilling of slag, possibilities to recycle elements present in the slag and savings of virgin limestone deposits. The slags used were an EAF slag and a slag from ladle refining; both originating from Swedish scrap based steel-making. Continuous biooxidation of the refractory gold concentrate was conducted in a single-stage 5L reactor at a retention time of 56h. The neutralisation capacity was determined by comparing the amount needed, per ton of feed concentrate added, to maintain the desired pH of 1.5 during steady state operation. Slaked lime had the highest neutralisation capacity with 110kg/ton feed followed by ladle slag and EAF slag with values of 152 and 267kg/ton feed, respectively. Sulphide mineral oxidation was similar and high in all cases although the ladle slag results were slightly better. Gold recoveries after cyanide leaching on the residues obtained were also similar and were in the range of 86–89%. However, the cyanide consumption expressed as kilogram cyanide per ton of concentrate fed to biooxidation, was double in the case of ladle slag and three times as much for the EAF slag compared to the slaked lime experiment. The increased cyanide consumption could not be explained only by the increased amount of elemental sulphur obtained in the slag experiments. The elemental sulphur formed had different reactivities as seen from the thiocyanate formation and cyanide losses due to thiocyanate formation were 16%, 32% and 40% for EAF slag, slaked lime and ladle slag, respectively. It is concluded that the ladle slag could be a possible replacement for limestone if they are mixed in proper proportions so that the microbial carbon dioxide demand is met whereas the EAF slag is less suitable due to the very fine reaction products obtained which gave operational problems with filtration and washing. To come further, experiments with the normal multi-stage biooxidation set-up with total retention time of 120h should be performed which would increase the sulphur oxidation and eventually also reduce the cyanide consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Gahan, Chandra Sekhar & Sundkvist, Jan-Eric & Engström, Fredrik & Sandström, Åke, 2011. "Utilisation of steel slags as neutralising agents in biooxidation of a refractory gold concentrate and their influence on the subsequent cyanidation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 541-547.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:541-547
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.01.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344911000073
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.01.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durinck, Dirk & Engström, Fredrik & Arnout, Sander & Heulens, Jeroen & Jones, Peter Tom & Björkman, Bo & Blanpain, Bart & Wollants, Patrick, 2008. "Hot stage processing of metallurgical slags," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1121-1131.
    2. Das, B. & Prakash, S. & Reddy, P.S.R. & Misra, V.N., 2007. "An overview of utilization of slag and sludge from steel industries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 40-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lanzerstorfer, Christof & Kröppl, Michaela, 2014. "Air classification of blast furnace dust collected in a fabric filter for recycling to the sinter process," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 132-137.
    2. Chen, Jianbiao & Gao, Shuaifei & Xu, Fang & Xu, Wenhao & Yang, Yuanjiang & Kong, Depeng & Wang, Yinfeng & Yao, Huicong & Chen, Haijun & Zhu, Yuezhao & Mu, Lin, 2022. "Influence of moisture and feedstock form on the pyrolysis behaviors, pyrolytic gas production, and residues micro-structure evolutions of an industrial sludge from a steel production enterprise," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Dana-Adriana Iluţiu-Varvara & Claudiu Aciu, 2022. "Metallurgical Wastes as Resources for Sustainability of the Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Carvalho, S.Z. & Vernilli, F. & Almeida, B. & Demarco, M. & Silva, S.N., 2017. "The recycling effect of BOF slag in the portland cement properties," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 216-220.
    5. Daniela Laura Buruiana & Cristian-Dragos Obreja & Elena Emanuela Herbei & Viorica Ghisman, 2021. "Re-Use of Silico-Manganese Slag," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-9, October.
    6. Jeong, Yong-Soo & Matsubae-Yokoyama, Kazuyo & Kubo, Hironari & Pak, Jong-Jin & Nagasaka, Tetsuya, 2009. "Substance flow analysis of phosphorus and manganese correlated with South Korean steel industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 479-489.
    7. Keng-Ta Lin & Her-Yung Wang & Yi-Ta Hsieh & Tien-Chun Kao, 2023. "Effect of High Temperature on the Expansion and Durability of SSRSC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Hannu Suopajärvi & Antti Salo & Timo Paananen & Riku Mattila & Timo Fabritius, 2013. "Recycling of Coking Plant Residues in a Finnish Steelworks—Laboratory Study and Replacement Ratio Calculation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Hugo Rondon Quintana & Saieth Chaves-Pabón & Diego A. Escobar, 2018. "Evaluation of a Warm Mix Asphalt Manufactured with Blast Furnace Slag," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Zhang, Tongsheng & Yu, Qijun & Wei, Jiangxiong & Li, Jianxin & Zhang, Pingping, 2011. "Preparation of high performance blended cements and reclamation of iron concentrate from basic oxygen furnace steel slag," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 48-55.
    11. Lundkvist, Katarina & Larsson, Mikael & Samuelsson, Caisa, 2013. "Optimisation of a centralised recycling system for steel plant by-products, a logistics perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 29-36.
    12. Raja, R. & Kumar, S., 2023. "Cupola slag as a green concrete-making material and its performance characteristics - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Lobato, Natália Cristina Candian & Villegas, Edwin Auza & Mansur, Marcelo Borges, 2015. "Management of solid wastes from steelmaking and galvanizing processes: A brief review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 49-57.
    14. Huaiwei, Zhang & Xin, Hong, 2011. "An overview for the utilization of wastes from stainless steel industries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(8), pages 745-754.
    15. Lanzerstorfer, Christof, 2015. "Application of air classification for improved recycling of sinter plant dust," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 66-71.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:55:y:2011:i:5:p:541-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.