Author
Listed:
- Liebensteiner, Mario
- Losert, Jakob
- Necker, Sarah
- Neumeier, Florian
- Paetzold, Jörg
- Wichert, Sebastian
Abstract
During June–August 2022, Germany temporarily reduced the fare of unlimited local and regional public transport nationwide to €9 per month. We study changes in mobility behavior and rail congestion effects induced by this 9-Euro Ticket. We employ difference-in-differences and event-study designs to analyze data from mobile-network devices, administrative traffic counts from road monitoring stations, and train arrival data. We find a strong increase in rail travel with modest substitution away from cars. Train trips rise by around 35%, while car traffic falls by 1–5%, with the smallest traffic reductions during commuting times and the largest increases in rail travel for leisure purposes on weekends and to touristic destinations. Moreover, the train demand surge materially worsens service quality via elevated train delays, which even spill over to long-distance trains. A welfare analysis suggests that the policy mostly acted as a cost-of-living transfer with limited emissions benefits, implying high implicit CO2 government abatement costs. Overall, our findings indicate that deeply discounted, nationwide “go-anywhere” tickets can substantially increase railway travel, yet generate limited car-to-rail substitution and strain service reliability when implemented without accompanying capacity extensions.During June–August 2022, Germany temporarily reduced the fare of unlimited local and regional public transport nationwide to €9 per month. We study changes in mobility behavior and rail congestion effects induced by this 9-Euro Ticket. We employ difference-in-differences and event-study designs to travel data from mobile-network devices, administrative traffic counts from road monitoring stations, and train arrival data. We find a strong increase in rail travel with modest substitution away from cars. Train trips rise by around 35%, while car traffic falls by 1–5%, with the smallest traffic reductions during commuting times and the largest increases in rail travel for leisure purposes on weekends and to touristic destinations. Moreover, the train demand surge materially worsens service quality via elevated train delays, which even spill over to long-distance trains. A welfare analysis suggests that the policy mostly acted as a cost-of-living transfer with limited emissions benefits, implying high implicit CO2 government abatement costs. Overall, our findings indicate that deeply discounted, nationwide “go-anywhere” tickets can substantially increase railway travel, yet generate limited car-to-rail substitution and strain service reliability when implemented without accompanying capacity extensions.
Suggested Citation
Liebensteiner, Mario & Losert, Jakob & Necker, Sarah & Neumeier, Florian & Paetzold, Jörg & Wichert, Sebastian, 2026.
"Almost fare free: Impact of a cheap public transport ticket on mobility patterns and train delays,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:258:y:2026:i:c:s0047272726000915
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105655
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
- R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
- R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
- R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy
- Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:258:y:2026:i:c:s0047272726000915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505578 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.