IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v229y2020ics0925527320301547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards customization: Evaluation of integrated sales, product, and production configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Linda L.
  • Lee, Carman K.M.
  • Akhtar, Pervaiz

Abstract

Unlike most of the available configuration solutions, the integrated sales, product and production configuration is proposed to help companies realize product customization from a holistic view. It achieves this by determining the functional features (i.e., sales configuration), possible product alternatives (i.e., product configuration), and production process alternatives (i.e., production configuration). With the presence of multiple alternatives, it is necessary to determine final products and production processes based on the evaluation. This study, thus, evaluates the product alternatives and production process alternatives, which are configured in the integrated configuration. In line with the fact that in practice, cost and time are two of the most important elements in quotation preparation, we develop evaluation models to minimize the production costs and completion time. In addition, to provide companies with better decision-making support in selecting product offerings, the proposed configuration evaluation computes the differences in terms of cost and time among all the product and production process alternatives. With the differences in cost and time, companies can opt for suitable selection with respect to time or cost and/or other factors, e.g., strategic objectives. A case application of temperature controllers is utilized to demonstrate the results of the proposed evaluation of the integrated configuration.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Linda L. & Lee, Carman K.M. & Akhtar, Pervaiz, 2020. "Towards customization: Evaluation of integrated sales, product, and production configuration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301547
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320301547
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Zhang & C.K.M. Lee & Q. Xu, 2010. "Towards product customization: An integrated order fulfillment system," Post-Print hal-00798983, HAL.
    2. Salvador, F. & Forza, C., 2004. "Configuring products to address the customization-responsiveness squeeze: A survey of management issues and opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 273-291, October.
    3. Kingsman, Brian & Hendry, Linda & Mercer, Alan & de Souza, Antonio, 1996. "Responding to customer enquiries in make-to-order companies Problems and solutions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 219-231, December.
    4. Alnestig, Peter & Segerstedt, Anders, 1996. "Product costing in ten Swedish manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 441-457, December.
    5. Taylor Randall & Christian Terwiesch & Karl T. Ulrich, 2007. "Research Note—User Design of Customized Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 268-280, 03-04.
    6. Paul Pitiot & Luis Garces Monge & Michel Aldanondo & Elise Vareilles & Paul Gaborit, 2020. "Optimisation of the concurrent product and process configuration: an approach to reduce computation time with an experimental evaluation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 631-647, January.
    7. L. Zhang & Élise Vareilles & Michel Aldanondo, 2013. "Generic bill of functions, materials and operations for SAP2 configuration," Post-Print hal-00846451, HAL.
    8. Pettersson, Annelie I. & Segerstedt, Anders, 2013. "Measuring supply chain cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 357-363.
    9. D. Wu & L. Zhang & J. Jiao & R. Lu, 2013. "SysML-based design chain information modeling for variety management in production reconfiguration," Post-Print hal-00846436, HAL.
    10. Dunbing Tang & Qi Wang & Inayat Ullah, 2017. "Optimisation of product configuration in consideration of customer satisfaction and low carbon," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3349-3373, June.
    11. Brun, Alessandro & Zorzini, Marta, 2009. "Evaluation of product customization strategies through modularization and postponement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 205-220, July.
    12. Trentin, Alessio & Perin, Elisa & Forza, Cipriano, 2012. "Product configurator impact on product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 850-859.
    13. Forza, Cipriano & Salvador, Fabrizio, 2002. "Managing for variety in the order acquisition and fulfilment process: The contribution of product configuration systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 87-98, March.
    14. L. Zhang & J. Jiao, 2013. "A graph rewriting system for process platform planning," Post-Print hal-00846449, HAL.
    15. Stonebraker, Peter W., 1996. "Restructuring the bill of material for productivity: A strategic evaluation of product configuration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 251-260, August.
    16. Lin Wang & Shi-Sheng Zhong & Yong-Jian Zhang, 2017. "Process configuration based on generative constraint satisfaction problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 945-957, April.
    17. Li, Xinyu & Shao, Xinyu & Gao, Liang & Qian, Weirong, 2010. "An effective hybrid algorithm for integrated process planning and scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 289-298, August.
    18. L. Zhang & B. Rodrigues, 2013. "A petri net model of process platform-based production configuration," Post-Print hal-00846422, HAL.
    19. Blecker, Thorsten & Abdelkafi, Nizar & Kaluza, Bernd & Friedrich, Gerhard, 2003. "Key Metrics System for Variety Steering in Mass Customization," MPRA Paper 8970, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Manuel García Sánchez & Xavier Vilasís Cardona & Alexandre Lerma Martín, 2022. "Influence of Car Configurator Webpage Data from Automotive Manufacturers on Car Sales by Means of Correlation and Forecasting," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Tchai Tavor & Limor Dina Gonen & Uriel Spiegel, 2021. "The Sorting Process as a Tool for Promoting the Demand of Heterogeneous Customers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linda Zhang & Carman K.M. Lee & Pervaiz Akhtar, 2020. "Towards customization: Evaluation of integrated sales, product, and production configuration," Post-Print hal-03276827, HAL.
    2. Zhang, Linda L. & Shafiee, Sara, 2022. "Developing separate or integrated configurators? A longitudinal case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Trentin, Alessio & Perin, Elisa & Forza, Cipriano, 2012. "Product configurator impact on product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 850-859.
    4. Dong Yang & Jia Li & Bill Wang & Yong-ji Jia, 2020. "Module-Based Product Configuration Decisions Considering Both Economical and Carbon Emission-Related Environmental Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Pai Zheng & Xun Xu & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A data-driven cyber-physical approach for personalised smart, connected product co-development in a cloud-based environment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 3-18, January.
    6. Blecker, Thorsten & Abdelkafi, Nizar & Kaluza, Bernd & Kreutler, Gerold, 2004. "Mass Customization vs. Complexity: A Gordian Knot?," MPRA Paper 5290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Clément Chatras & Vincent Giard & Mustapha Sali, 2016. "Mass customisation impact on bill of materials structure and master production schedule development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5634-5650, September.
    8. Zhang, Linda L., 2015. "A literature review on multitype platforming and framework for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Sreedevi, R. & Saranga, Haritha, 2017. "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 332-342.
    10. Nikolaus Kangas & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Harri Haapasalo & Tuomo Kinnunen, 2013. "Empirical Aspects on Defining Product Data for Rapid Productisation," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 109-130.
    11. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:109-130 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    13. Uskonen, Jukka & Tenhiälä, Antti, 2012. "The price of responsiveness: Cost analysis of change orders in make-to-order manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 420-429.
    14. Li, Xiaohong & Yang, Dong & Hu, Mengqi, 2018. "A scenario-based stochastic programming approach for the product configuration problem under uncertainties and carbon emission regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 126-146.
    15. Wong, Hartanto & Lesmono, Dharma, 2013. "On the evaluation of product customization strategies in a vertically differentiated market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 105-117.
    16. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    17. Cakravastia, Andi & Toha, Isa S. & Nakamura, Nobuto, 2002. "A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 231-248, December.
    18. Marrocu, Emanuela & Paci, Raffaele, 2011. "They arrive with new information. Tourism flows and production efficiency in the European regions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 750-758.
    19. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    20. Fay, Scott & Mitra, Deb & Wang, Qiong, 2009. "Ask or infer? Strategic implications of alternative learning approaches in customization," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 136-152.
    21. Boxuan Zhao & Jianmin Gao & Kun Chen & Ke Guo, 2018. "Two-generation Pareto ant colony algorithm for multi-objective job shop scheduling problem with alternative process plans and unrelated parallel machines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 93-108, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320301547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.