IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v114y2008i1p149-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability modeling and analysis of serial-parallel hybrid multi-operational manufacturing system considering dimensional quality, tool degradation and system configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Ji-wen
  • Xi, Li-feng
  • Du, Shi-chang
  • Ju, Bo

Abstract

Machine configuration selection has a great impact on the system-level reliability of a manufacturing system, while the absence of proper consideration of the product quality and the tool degradation on tool failure when determining the machine-level reliability is likely to result in unanticipated machine downtimes or inappropriate maintenance decisions. A generic methodology is thus developed to incorporate both the machine-level and the system-level reliability analyses. Firstly, the machine-level reliability is investigated based on the product dimensional quality and the tool degradation. A novel machine-level quality reliability-integrated model is developed to address the interaction between product quality and tool reliability. The developed machine-level reliability model is then used to estimate the system-level reliability for a manufacturing system with selected configurations. Various hybrid configurations of the multi-operational manufacturing system are investigated in terms of the system-level reliability. The analytical procedure and the effectiveness of the proposed methodology are demonstrated through an example of a serial-parallel hybrid system for cylinder head gasket machining.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Ji-wen & Xi, Li-feng & Du, Shi-chang & Ju, Bo, 2008. "Reliability modeling and analysis of serial-parallel hybrid multi-operational manufacturing system considering dimensional quality, tool degradation and system configuration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 149-164, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:114:y:2008:i:1:p:149-164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(08)00009-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Makis, V., 1995. "Optimal replacement of a tool subject to random failure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 249-256, October.
    2. Makis, Viliam, 1999. "Optimal control policy for a tool-wear process subject to shocks and random failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 613-621, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ye, Zhenggeng & Cai, Zhiqiang & Zhou, Fuli & Zhao, Jiangbin & Zhang, Pan, 2019. "Reliability analysis for series manufacturing system with imperfect inspection considering the interaction between quality and degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 345-356.
    2. Xia, Tangbin & Xi, Lifeng & Zhou, Xiaojun & Lee, Jay, 2012. "Dynamic maintenance decision-making for series–parallel manufacturing system based on MAM–MTW methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 231-240.
    3. Ding Zhang & Yingjie Zhang & Mingrang Yu & Yun Chen, 2017. "Reliability evaluation and component importance measure for manufacturing systems based on failure losses," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(8), pages 1859-1869, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick H. Liu, 2000. "A comparative study of three tool replacement/operation sequencing strategies in a flexible manufacturing system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(6), pages 479-499, September.
    2. Makis, Viliam, 1999. "Optimal control policy for a tool-wear process subject to shocks and random failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 613-621, April.
    3. Jeffrey Kharoufeh & Steven Cox & Mark Oxley, 2013. "Reliability of manufacturing equipment in complex environments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 231-254, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:114:y:2008:i:1:p:149-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.