IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v508y2018icp702-709.html

Network and community structure in a scientific team with high creative performance

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jingjing
  • Zhang, Jian
  • Li, Huajiao
  • Jiang, Meihui

Abstract

Current studies have indicated that the type and intensity of the relations in a social network can impact individuals’ creative performance. However, it is more practical to explore how to improve team’s creative performance from the perspective of network and community structure. We conduct a survey of a real scientific team network, in which each team member chooses five members (s)he regards as his (her) friends, five members (s)he always works with, and five members (s)he wants to work with. The members were asked to rank the five members they selected according to their closeness. We derived three networks: a friend network, a real cooperation network and a desired cooperation network. Additionally, we have constructed a directed-weighted network with the team members as nodes, the relations (friend, real cooperation, and cooperation desire) between members as edges, and the closeness of these relations as weights. The main results show the following. (1) This scientific team is a leader network with nodes with weighted degrees significantly larger than those of other nodes. The weighted in-degree sequence and the weighted out-degree sequence have different properties. (2) Creative performance is higher for the leader communities than for the self-organized communities. After removing the leader nodes of the leader communities, creative performance in the communities and in the whole network decreased. (3) Quadratic assignment procedure correlation (QAP) analysis shows that the similarity between the real cooperation network and the desired cooperation network is lowest in self-organized communities, and the creative performance is low if the similarity between the two networks is low; (4) creative performance is lower in a network that only takes into account the desired cooperation of members. This study sheds light on the potential application of complex networks in the issues of group division and team construction in the workplace and in the field of education.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jingjing & Zhang, Jian & Li, Huajiao & Jiang, Meihui, 2018. "Network and community structure in a scientific team with high creative performance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 508(C), pages 702-709.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:508:y:2018:i:c:p:702-709
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437118306411
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cardillo, Alessio & Scellato, Salvatore & Latora, Vito, 2006. "A topological analysis of scientific coauthorship networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 372(2), pages 333-339.
    2. Ali Gazni & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Fereshteh Didegah, 2012. "Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 323-335, February.
    3. Ali Gazni & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Fereshteh Didegah, 2012. "Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 323-335, February.
    4. Roohi, A.A. & Shirazi, A.H. & Kargaran, A. & Jafari, G.R., 2010. "Local model of a scientific collaboration in physics network compared with the global model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(23), pages 5530-5537.
    5. Zheng Xie & Zonglin Xie & Miao Li & Jianping Li & Dongyun Yi, 2017. "Modeling the coevolution between citations and coauthorship of scientific papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 483-507, July.
    6. Fu, Jingcheng & Wu, Jianliang & Liu, Chuanjian & Xu, Jin, 2016. "Leaders in communities of real-world networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 428-441.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Shenwen & Ren, Siqiao & Zheng, Lei & Yang, Hanxin & Du, Wenbo & Cao, Xianbin, 2022. "A comparison study of educational scientific collaboration in China and the USA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2019. "Diversification versus specialization in scientific research: Which strategy pays off?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 51-57.
    2. Cathelijn J F Waaijer & Benoît Macaluso & Cassidy R Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière, 2016. "Stability and Longevity in the Publication Careers of U.S. Doctorate Recipients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Constance Poitras & Vincent Larivière, 2023. "Research mobility to the United States: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2601-2614, April.
    4. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    5. Seokbeom Kwon & Jan Youtie & Alan Porter & Nils Newman, 2024. "How does regulatory uncertainty shape the innovation process? Evidence from the case of nanomedicine," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 262-302, February.
    6. Önder, Ali Sina & Schweitzer, Sascha & Yilmazkuday, Hakan, 2021. "Specialization, field distance, and quality in economists’ collaborations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    7. Peng Liu & Haoxiang Xia, 2015. "Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 101-134, April.
    8. Petr Praus, 2025. "A note on the topic of single-author articles in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 3071-3088, May.
    9. Wencan Tian & Ruonan Cai & Zhichao Fang & Yu Geng & Xianwen Wang & Zhigang Hu, 2024. "Understanding co‐corresponding authorship: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(1), pages 3-23, January.
    10. Rahman, Mohammad Tariqur & Regenstein, Joe Mac & Kassim, Noor Lide Abu & Haque, Nazmul, 2017. "The need to quantify authors’ relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 275-281.
    11. Ortega, José Luis & Aguillo, Isidro F., 2013. "Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 394-403.
    12. María Bordons & Borja González-Albo & Javier Aparicio & Luz Moreno, 2015. "The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1385-1400, February.
    13. Tang, Kun & Li, Baiyang & Zhu, Qiyu & Ma, Lecun, 2024. "Disruptive content, cross agglomeration interaction, and agglomeration replacement: Does cohesion foster strength?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    14. Fan Wu & Zhixu Liu, 2024. "An Empirical Analysis of the Characteristics and Determinants of the China–ASEAN Science and Technology Cooperation Network: Insights from Co-Authored Publications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Kuan, Chung-Huei & Chen, Dar-Zen & Huang, Mu-Hsuan, 2024. "Dubious cross-national affiliations obscure the assessment of international research collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    16. Xinzhe Li & Xiao Lu, 2025. "Analysis of the research collaboration organizational characteristics and scientific impact of large-scale research facilities: a case study of Chinese large-scale research facilities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2639-2671, May.
    17. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    18. Ba Xuan Nguyen & Markus Luczak-Roesch & Jesse David Dinneen, 2024. "Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Barrios, Candelaria & Flores, Esther & Martínez, M. Angeles & Ruiz-Martínez, Marta, 2019. "Is there convergence in international research collaboration? An exploration at the country level in the basic and applied science fields," MPRA Paper 123487, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. A. Velez-Estevez & P. García-Sánchez & J. A. Moral-Munoz & M. J. Cobo, 2022. "Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7517-7555, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:508:y:2018:i:c:p:702-709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.