IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/marpol/v44y2014icp239-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological risk assessment of the Marshall Islands longline tuna fishery

Author

Listed:
  • Gilman, Eric
  • Owens, Matthew
  • Kraft, Thomas

Abstract

To support implementing an ecosystem approach to fisheries management, ecological risk assessment (ERA) methods have recently been developed for the continuum of data-deficient to data-rich fisheries. A semi-quantitative ERA was conducted for the Marshall Islands longline bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) fishery. The study used information from analyses of observer data, surveys of captains and crew and inventories of gear and equipment. Relative risks were evaluated through a consideration of phylogenetic uniqueness, risk of population extirpation, risk of species extinction and importance in ecosystem regulation. The fishery presents a highest relative risk to leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata), green (Chelonia mydas) and olive Ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtle Regional Management Units that overlap with the fishery, in that order. The next highest relative risk is to affected stocks of oceanic whitetip (Carcharhinus longimanus), blue (Prionace glauca), and silky (Carcharhinus falciformis) sharks, in that sequence. Seabird bycatch is likely not problematic. There was inadequate information to assess risks to cetacean populations. Risks to stocks of market and non-market species of marine fishes with r-selected life history characteristics were not assessed. This is because estimates of critical threshold levels of local and absolute abundance and current biomass are not known for many of these stocks. Several best practice gear technology methods to mitigate problematic catch of vulnerable species groups are currently employed: monofilament leaders, whole fish for bait, single-hooking fish bait, no lightsticks, and no fishing at shallow submerged features. Setting terminal tackle below 100m and carrying and using best practice handling and release equipment were methods identified to reduce fishing mortality and injury of vulnerable species. More information is needed to determine if weaker hooks should be prescribed to mitigate cetacean bycatch. The large benefit to sea turtles of replacing remaining J-shaped hooks with circle hooks might outweigh a possible small increase in elasmobranch catch rates. The consumption of 2024l of fuel per tonne of landed catch, which is within the range of available estimated rates from similar fisheries, could be reduced, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, through more frequent maintenance and upgrading vessel equipment and materials. Observer data quality may be adequate to support a quantitative Level 3 ERA to determine the significance of the effect of various factors on standardized catch rates and to estimate population-level effects from fishing mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilman, Eric & Owens, Matthew & Kraft, Thomas, 2014. "Ecological risk assessment of the Marshall Islands longline tuna fishery," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 239-255.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:239-255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X13001966
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilman, Eric L., 2011. "Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 590-609, September.
    2. Waugh, Susan M. & Filippi, Dominique P. & Kirby, David S. & Abraham, Edward & Walker, Nathan, 2012. "Ecological Risk Assessment for seabird interactions in Western and Central Pacific longline fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 933-946.
    3. Waugh, S.M. & Baker, G.B. & Gales, R. & Croxall, J.P., 2008. "CCAMLR process of risk assessment to minimise the effects of longline fishing mortality on seabirds," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 442-454, May.
    4. Gilman, Eric & Clarke, Shelley & Brothers, Nigel & Alfaro-Shigueto, Joanna & Mandelman, John & Mangel, Jeff & Petersen, Samantha & Piovano, Susanna & Thomson, Nicola & Dalzell, Paul & Donoso, Miguel &, 2008. "Shark interactions in pelagic longline fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Small, Cleo & Waugh, Susan M. & Phillips, Richard A., 2013. "The justification, design and implementation of Ecological Risk Assessments of the effects of fishing on seabirds," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 192-199.
    6. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Gilman & Milani Chaloupka & Brett Wiedoff & Jeremy Willson, 2014. "Mitigating Seabird Bycatch during Hauling by Pelagic Longline Vessels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Fauconnet, Laurence & Rochet, Marie-Joëlle, 2016. "Fishing selectivity as an instrument to reach management objectives in an ecosystem approach to fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 46-54.
    3. Oliver, Shelby & Braccini, Matias & Newman, Stephen J. & Harvey, Euan S., 2015. "Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 86-97.
    4. Curtis, K. Alexandra & Moore, Jeffrey E. & Boyd, Charlotte & Dillingham, Peter W. & Lewison, Rebecca L. & Taylor, Barbara L. & James, Kelsey C., 2015. "Managing catch of marine megafauna: Guidelines for setting limit reference points," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 249-263.
    5. Poisson, François & Séret, Bernard & Vernet, Anne-Lise & Goujon, Michel & Dagorn, Laurent, 2014. "Collaborative research: Development of a manual on elasmobranch handling and release best practices in tropical tuna purse-seine fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 312-320.
    6. Chan, Valerie & Clarke, Raymond & Squires, Dale, 2014. "Full retention in tuna fisheries: Benefits, costs and unintended consequences," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 213-221.
    7. Stevanovic Dalibor, 2016. "Common time variation of parameters in reduced-form macroeconomic models," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 159-183, April.
    8. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.
    9. A. Fadlelmawla & M. Al-Otaibi, 2005. "Analysis of the Water Resources Status in Kuwait," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 19(5), pages 555-570, October.
    10. Stefan Mišković, 2017. "A VNS-LP algorithm for the robust dynamic maximal covering location problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(4), pages 1011-1033, October.
    11. Duan, Jinyun & Li, Chenwei & Xu, Yue & Wu, Chia-Huei, 2017. "Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: a Pygmalion mechanism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68035, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Hota, Monali & Bartsch, Fabian, 2019. "Consumer socialization in childhood and adolescence: Impact of psychological development and family structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 11-20.
    13. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    14. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    15. Peter Burnell, 2008. "From Evaluating Democracy Assistance to Appraising Democracy Promotion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(2), pages 414-434, June.
    16. M. J. Naderi & M. S. Pishvaee, 2017. "Robust bi-objective macroscopic municipal water supply network redesign and rehabilitation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2689-2711, July.
    17. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    18. Minghe Sun, 2005. "Warm-Start Routines for Solving Augmented Weighted Tchebycheff Network Programs in Multiple-Objective Network Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 422-437, November.
    19. Viren Swami & Phik-Wern Loo & Adrian Furnham, 2010. "Public Knowledge and Beliefs About Depression Among Urban and Rural Malays in Malaysia," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(5), pages 480-496, September.
    20. Jugend, Daniel & da Silva, Sérgio Luis & Salgado, Manoel Henrique & Miguel, Paulo Augusto Cauchick, 2016. "Product portfolio management and performance: Evidence from a survey of innovative Brazilian companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5095-5100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:marpol:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:239-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.