IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v140y2024ics0264837724000711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of green space provision for housing estates at metropolitan scale: A spatiotemporal assessment of proximity in a rapidly urbanizing Chinese city during the last 10 years

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Huilin
  • Yan, Yujia
  • Yan, Qi
  • Zhang, Qingping

Abstract

Understanding urban green space (UGS) provision in relation to its proximity, amid rapid urbanization and increasing UGS construction, is crucial for sustainable urban development. This study introduces a population-weighted proximity index to analyze the supply, surplus, and deficits of UGS provision for residents, both inside and outside UGS access radii. We assessed spatiotemporal changes in UGS provision from 2012 to 2021 in Shanghai to identify areas lacking UGSs, planning irrationalities, and needs for new UGS construction. We calculated the priority locations for new UGSs, focusing on residents most in need yet situated outside UGS access radii. Based on these, we accordingly create detailed and specific UGS development proposals. The findings show that the UGS provision on proximity that residents actually obtained in Shanghai citywide has improved at the city, community, and neighborhood levels over the past 10 years. Shanghai has undergone a phase of increasing UGS construction, resulting in more residents, previously outside UGS access radii, now being within these areas. However, despite these developments, many residential locations within UGS access radii still face insufficient UGS provision. At the neighborhood level, large proximity UGS deficits, where residents are located out of an access radius, still need to be solved. At the city and community levels, large UGS deficits within access radii also need to be solved. The proximity deficits in most urgent need to be solved at any level are for residents located outside of a UGS access radius. We also find that many of the newly built UGSs, which were constructed to address the proximity deficits for residents located outside of an access radius at both the city and community levels, were not smartly or efficiently planned. In the future, more UGSs could be newly built at locations with optimal priorities according to the findings of this study to solve efficiently the proximity deficits for residents still located outside of a UGS access radius, and to improve UGS provision on proximity at all three levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Huilin & Yan, Yujia & Yan, Qi & Zhang, Qingping, 2024. "Development of green space provision for housing estates at metropolitan scale: A spatiotemporal assessment of proximity in a rapidly urbanizing Chinese city during the last 10 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:140:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000711
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724000711
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:140:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.