IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v131y2023ics0264837723001801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposing a multi-jurisdictional framework for 3D digital cadastre in Australia and New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Atazadeh, Behnam
  • Rajabifard, Abbas
  • Olfat, Hamed

Abstract

Recent studies in Australia and New Zealand have explored various technological, legal, and institutional aspects of 3D cadastre modernisation. The majority of these studies concentrate on a single jurisdiction. The reason is that each jurisdiction is in charge of its own cadastral system. As a result, each jurisdiction's standards, rules, and processes for implementing 3D digital cadastre are unique. In Australia and New Zealand, however, the Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping (ICSM) has established national frameworks for cadastral systems. To implement 3D digital cadastre at a national level, it is vital to identify the variations and commonalities across existing cadastral systems. Comparisons of 3D cadastre for several civil law countries as well as international standards have been undertaken in the present literature. However, common law jurisdictions such as Australian states and New Zealand have not been compared in terms of 3D cadastre. Therefore, the main goal of this study is to propose a multi-jurisdictional framework that includes variations and commonalities in the current methods adopted for subdividing ownership of vertically placed properties in order to support 3D digital cadastre in all Australian and New Zealand jurisdictions. The proposed framework comprises four layers: definition, core, interoperability and jurisdictional. This framework would potentially serve as a starting point for building a nationally integrated digital data ecosystem for 3D cadastre in Australia and New Zealand.

Suggested Citation

  • Atazadeh, Behnam & Rajabifard, Abbas & Olfat, Hamed, 2023. "Proposing a multi-jurisdictional framework for 3D digital cadastre in Australia and New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001801
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723001801
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamed Olfat & Behnam Atazadeh & Farshad Badiee & Yiqun Chen & Davood Shojaei & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "A Proposal for Streamlining 3D Digital Cadastral Data Lifecycle," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Çağdaş, Volkan & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Ploeger, Hendrik & Kara, Abdullah, 2020. "Co-ownership shares in condominium – A comparative analysis for selected civil law jurisdictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madsen, Morten Dalum & Paasch, Jesper Mayntz, 2023. "3D real property in vertical mixed-use developments. A comparative analysis of common property and management aspects in selected jurisdictions – The case of British Columbia, Denmark and Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Madsen, Morten D. & Paasch, Jesper M. & Sørensen, Esben M., 2022. "The many faces of condominiums and various management structures − The Danish case," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Grgo Dželalija & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Bibliometrics on Public Utilities Registration Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Shin, Jihye & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2022. "A BIM-based framework for property dispute minimization – A case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Trends in 3D cadastre – A literature survey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Bahram Saeidian & Abbas Rajabifard & Behnam Atazadeh & Mohsen Kalantari, 2021. "Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Dionysia-Georgia Perperidou & Konstantinos Sigizis & Agkronilnta Chotza, 2021. "3D Underground Property Rights of Transportation Infrastructures: Case Study of Piraeus Metro Station, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:131:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723001801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.