IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i10p1101-d658447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Bahram Saeidian

    (The Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia)

  • Abbas Rajabifard

    (The Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia)

  • Behnam Atazadeh

    (The Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia)

  • Mohsen Kalantari

    (The Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia)

Abstract

The development and use of underground space is a necessity for most cities in response to rapid urbanisation. Effective underground land administration is critical for sustainable urban development. From a land administration perspective, the ownership extent of underground assets is essential for planning and managing underground areas. In some jurisdictions, physical structures (e.g., walls, ceilings, and utilities) are also necessary to delineate the ownership extent of underground assets. The current practice of underground land administration focuses on the ownership of underground space and mostly relies on 2D survey plans. This inefficient and fragmented 2D-based underground data management and communication results in several issues including boundary disputes, underground strikes, delays and disruptions in projects, economic losses, and urban planning issues. This study provides a review of underground land administration from three common aspects: legal, institutional, and technical. A range of important challenges have been identified based on the current research and practice. To address these challenges, the authors of this study propose a new framework for 3D underground land administration. The proposed framework outlines the future research directions to upgrade underground land administration using integrated 3D digital approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahram Saeidian & Abbas Rajabifard & Behnam Atazadeh & Mohsen Kalantari, 2021. "Underground Land Administration from 2D to 3D: Critical Challenges and Future Research Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:1101-:d:658447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karabin, Marcin & Kitsakis, Dimitrios & Koeva, Mila & Navratil, Gerhard & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Vučić, Nikola & Janečka, Karel & Lisec, Anka, 2020. "Layer approach to ownership in 3D cadastre in the case of underground tunnels," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Kalogianni, Eftychia & Dimopoulou, Efi & Thompson, Rodney James & Lemmen, Christiaan & Ying, Shen & van Oosterom, Peter, 2020. "Development of 3D spatial profiles to support the full lifecycle of 3D objects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Yan, Jingya & Van Son, Rob & Soon, Kean Huat, 2021. "From underground utility survey to land administration: An underground utility 3D data model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Asghari, Ali & Kalantari, Mohsen & Rajabifard, Abbas, 2020. "A structured framework for 3D cadastral data validation − a case study for Victoria, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Jesper M. Paasch & Jenny Paulsson, 2021. "3D Property Research from a Legal Perspective Revisited," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Grgo Dželalija & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Bibliometrics on Public Utilities Registration Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Dionysia-Georgia Perperidou & Konstantinos Sigizis & Agkronilnta Chotza, 2021. "3D Underground Property Rights of Transportation Infrastructures: Case Study of Piraeus Metro Station, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Ramlakhan, Rohit & Kalogianni, Eftychia & van Oosterom, Peter & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2023. "Modelling the legal spaces of 3D underground objects in 3D land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Hubert Frąszczak, 2021. "Coherence of Cadastral Data in Land Management—A Case Study of Rural Areas in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Grgo Dželalija & Miodrag Roić, 2023. "Bibliometrics on Public Utilities Registration Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Jarosław Bydłosz & Agnieszka Bieda, 2020. "Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Dionysia-Georgia Perperidou & Konstantinos Sigizis & Agkronilnta Chotza, 2021. "3D Underground Property Rights of Transportation Infrastructures: Case Study of Piraeus Metro Station, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Madsen, Morten Dalum & Paasch, Jesper Mayntz, 2023. "3D real property in vertical mixed-use developments. A comparative analysis of common property and management aspects in selected jurisdictions – The case of British Columbia, Denmark and Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Ali Asghari & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Formative and Summative Validation of Building Information Model-Based Cadastral Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Madsen, Morten D. & Paasch, Jesper M. & Sørensen, Esben M., 2022. "The many faces of condominiums and various management structures − The Danish case," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Ramlakhan, Rohit & Kalogianni, Eftychia & van Oosterom, Peter & Atazadeh, Behnam, 2023. "Modelling the legal spaces of 3D underground objects in 3D land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Munkhbaatar Buuveibaatar & Kangjae Lee & Wonhee Lee, 2022. "Implementation of the LADM-Based Cadastral Model for Mongolia towards Transition to a 3D Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Hamed Olfat & Behnam Atazadeh & Farshad Badiee & Yiqun Chen & Davood Shojaei & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "A Proposal for Streamlining 3D Digital Cadastral Data Lifecycle," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Atazadeh, Behnam & Rajabifard, Abbas & Olfat, Hamed, 2023. "Proposing a multi-jurisdictional framework for 3D digital cadastre in Australia and New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Ying, Shen & Xu, Yifan & Li, Chengpeng & Guo, Renzhong & Li, Lin, 2021. "Easement spatialization with two cases based on LADM and BIM," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Trends in 3D cadastre – A literature survey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Thompson, Rodney & van Oosterom, Peter, 2021. "Bi-temporal foundation for LADM v2: Fusing event and state based modelling of Land administration data 2D and 3D," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Diana Bobikova & Zofia Kuzevicova & Stefan Kuzevic & Ibrahim Alkhalaf, 2022. "Proposal of a New Approach for Protected Deposit Area Registration in Public Administration Information Systems—A Case Study from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Hicret Gürsoy Sürmeneli & Mila Koeva & Mehmet Alkan, 2022. "The Application Domain Extension (ADE) 4D Cadastral Data Model and Its Application in Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Miodrag Roić & Grgo Dželalija, 2024. "Registration of the Legal Status of Public Utilities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:1101-:d:658447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.